Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Bildgebung bei Stressfrakturen

Stressfrakturen sind keine gewöhnlichen Frakturen. Daher lassen sie sich in den meisten Fällen auch nicht mit einer konventionellen Röntgenaufnahme nachweisen. Andere bildgebende Verfahren sind besser geeignet.

Publication History

Article published online:
08 May 2020

• Literatur

• 1 Bhatnagar A, Kumar M, Shivanna D. et al. High incidence of stress fractures in military cadets during training: A point of concern. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR 2015; 9 (08) RC01–3
• 2 Fredericson M, Bergman AG, Hoffman KL. et al. Tibial stress reaction in runners. Correlation of clinical symptoms and scintigraphy with a new magnetic resonance imaging grading system. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 1995; 23 (04) 472-481
• 3 Geslien GE, Thrall JH, Espinosa JL. et al. Early detection of stress fractures using 99mTc-polyphosphate. Radiology 1976; 121 (3Pt.1), 683-687
• 4 Giladi M, Milgrom C, Simkin A. et al. Stress fractures. Identifiable risk factors. In: The American Journal of Sports Medicine 19 (06) 647-652 DOI: 10.1177/036354659101900617
• 5 Greaney RB, Gerber FH, Laughlin RL. et al. Distribution and natural history of stress fractures in U. S. Marine recruits. In: Radiology 1983; 146 (02) 339-346
• 6 Milgrom C, Giladi M, Stein M. et al. Stress fractures in military recruits. A prospective study showing an unusually high incidence. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 1985; 67 (05) 732-735
• 7 Mulligan ME. The „gray cortex”: An early sign of stress fracture. Skeletal Radiology 1995; 24 (03) 201-203
• 8 Rizzone KH, Ackerman KE, Roos KG. et al. The epidemiology of stress fractures in collegiate student-athletes, 2004–2005 through 2013–2014 academic years. Journal of Athletic Training 2017; 52 (10) 966-975