Download PDF
TumorDiagnostik & Therapie 2020; 41(03): 178-186
DOI: 10.1055/a-1120-4641
Thieme Onkologie aktuell

Die Nachsorge des Lungenkarzinoms

Follow-Up and Surveillance after Lung Cancer Treatment
Amanda Tufman
1   Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik V, Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern
,
Thomas Duell
2   Klinik für Pneumologie, Asklepios Lungenfachkliniken München-Gauting
,
Christian Schneider
3   Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik (Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeralchirurgie), Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Ziel dieses Beitrags ist es, die aktuellen Leitlinien bzw. Empfehlungen zur Nachsorge des Lungenkarzinoms zu präsentieren und eine evidenzbasierte Herangehensweise für die Erstellung von individualisierten Nachsorgeplänen aufzuzeigen.

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present the current guideline recommendations for the follow-up and surveillance of lung cancer patients and to outline an evidence-based approach to planing individualised follow-up care.

Schlüsselwörter

Lungenkrebs - Onkologie - Tumornachsorge - Rezidiv

Key words

lung cancer - oncology - follow-up - surveillance - recurrence


Publication History

Article published online:
01 April 2020

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Huber RM, Tufman A. Nachsorge beim Lungenkarzinom. In: Huber RM. Hrsg. Manual Tumoren der Lunge und des Mediastinum des Tumorzentrum München. 11.. Aufl. München: Zuckschwerdt; 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Hanna W, Paul N, Darling G. et al. Minimal-dose computed tomography is superior to chest x-ray for the follow-up and treatment of patients with resected lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147: 30-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Westeel V, Barlesi P, Foucher JJ. et al Results of the phase III IFCT-0302 trial assessing minimal versus CT-scan-based follow-up for completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ann Oncol 2017; 28 (Suppl. 5)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V. (AWMF); Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V. (DKG); Deutsche Krebshilfe (DKH). S3-Leitlinie zur Prävention, Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Lungenkarzinoms der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und der Deutschen Krebsgesellschaft, AWMF-Register Nr. 020/007OL, Stand: 02/2018, gültig bis 12/2022. Im Internet (Stand: 04.02.2019): https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/020-007OL_l_S3_Lungenkarzinom_2018-03.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Postmus PE, Kerr KM, Oudkerk M. et al. Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2017; 28 (Suppl. 04) iv1-iv21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 [Anonym]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2011) Lung cancer: diagnosis and management (NICE Clinical Guideline 33). Im Internet (Stand: 26.11.2018): https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg121/chapter/1-Guidance#follow-up-and-patient-perspectives
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ettinger D, Wood D, Aisner D. et al NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines (NCCN Guidelines®). Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Version Version 3.2019. Im Internet (Stand: 29.01.2019): https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/nscl.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Nguyen TK, Senan S, Bradley JD. et al. Optimal imaging surveillance after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for earlystage non-small cell lung cancer: Findings of an International Delphi Consensus Study. Pract Radiat Oncol 2018; 8: e71-e78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 van Loon J, Grutters J, Wanders R. et al. Follow-up with 18FDG‑PET‑CT after radical radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy allows the detection of potentially curable progressive disease in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a prospective study. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 588
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Maeshima A, Tochigi N, Yoshida A. et al. Histological scoring for small lung adenocarcinomas 2 cm or less in diameter: a reliable prognostic indicator. J Thorac Oncol 2010; 5: 333-339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kadota K, Villena-Vargas J, Yoshizawa A. et al. Prognostic significance of adenocarcinoma in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, and nonmucinous lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinoma of the lung in patients with stageI disease. Am J Surg Pathol 2014; 38: 448-460
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kobayashi N, Toyooka S, Soh J. et al. Risk factors for recurrence and unfavorable prognosis in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer and a tumor diameter of 20 mm or less. J Thorac Oncol 2007; 2: 808-812
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Watanabe K, Tsuboi M, Sakamaki K. et al. Postoperative followup strategy based on recurrence dynamics for non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 49: 1624-1631
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Dood R, Zhou Y, Armbruster S. et al. Defining survivorship and surveillance with evidence. 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting, Abstract Nr. 6528. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36 (Suppl.): 6528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Johnson BE. Second Lung Cancers in patients after treatment for an initial lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90 (18) 1335-1345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Surapaneni R, Singh P, Rajagopalan K. et al. Stage I Lung Cancer Survivorship: Risk of Second Malignancies and Need for Individualized Care Plan. J Thorac Oncol 2012; 7: 1252-1256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Srikantharajah D, Ghuman A, Nagendran M. et al. Is computed tomography follow-up of patients after lobectomy for nonsmall cell lung cancer of benefit in terms of survival?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012; 15: 893-898
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Calman L, Beaver K, Hind D. et al. Survival benefits from followup of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Thorac Oncol 2011; 6: 1993-2004
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Pisters KM, Le Chevalier T. Adjuvant chemotherapy in completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 3270-3278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Toyokawa G, Seto T, Takenoyama M. et al. Insights into brain metastasis in patients with ALK+ lung cancer: is the brain truly a sanctuary?. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2015; 34: 797-805
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Sawada S, Suehisa H, Ueno T. et al. Monitoring and management of lung cancer patients following curative-intent treatment: clinical utility of 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Lung Cancer (Auckl) 2016; 7: 45-51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Mansueti JR, Maillie S. A Review of non-small cell lung cancer post-treatment follow-up imaging procedures with pet/ct scans versus CT scans and the effect on patient survival. Int J Radiat Oncol 2017; 98: 231
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Reddy J, Tang C, Shih T. et al. Influence of Surveillance PET/CT on Detection of Early Recurrence After Definitive Radiation in Stage III Non-small-cell Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2017; 18: 141-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ulaner GA, Lyall A. Identifying and distinguishing treatment effects and complications from malignancy at FDG PET/CT. Radiographics 2013; 33: 1817-1834
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Zhu H, Bi Y, Han A. et al. Risk factors for brain metastases in completely resected small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study to identify patients most likely to benefit from prophylactic cranial irradiation. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9: 216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hendriks LEL, Brouns AJWM, Amini M. et al. Development of symptomatic brain metastases after chemoradiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: Does the type of chemotherapy regimen matter?. Lung Cancer 2016; 101: 68-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Zeng H, Xie P, Meng X. et al. Risk factors for brain metastases after prophylactic cranial irradiation in small cell lung cancer. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 42743
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Mamon HJ, Yeap BY, Jänne PA. et al. High risk of brain metastases in surgically staged IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 1530-1537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Chen AM, Jahan TM, Jablons DM. et al Risk of cerebral metastases and neurological death after pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced nonsmall‐cell lung cancer. Cancer 2007; 109: 1668-1675 . doi:10.1002/cncr.22565
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Omuro AMP, Kris MG, Miller VA. et al. High incidence of disease recurrence in the brain and leptomeninges in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma after response to Gefitinib. Cancer 2005; 103: 2344-2348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Williams K, Jackson SE, Beeken RJ. et al. The impact of a cancer diagnosis on health and well-being: a prospective, populationbased study. Psychooncology 2016; 25: 626-632
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Owen J, Goldstein M, Lee J. et al. Use of health-related and cancer-specific support groups among adult cancer survivors. Cancer 2007; 109: 2580-2589
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Lou F, Huang J, Sima C. et al. Patterns of recurrence and second primary lung cancer in early-stage lung cancer survivors followed with routine computed tomography surveillance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145: 75-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Martini N, Beins MS, Burt MD. et al. Incidence of local recurrence and second primary tumors in resected stage I lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 109: 120-129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Novello S, Barlesi F, Califano R. et al. Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2016; 27 (Suppl. 05) v1-v27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar