Current challenges and future needs of clinical and endoscopic training in gastroenterology: a European survey

Abstract

Background and study aims A universal European training program in gastroenterology and hepatology is currently not available. The European Board of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (EBGH) has produced guidance regarding expected competencies for European gastroenterology trainees but it is unclear whether these have been incorporated in national curricula. The aim of this study was to provide an in-depth assessment of training and research opportunities, professional activities and of socioeconomic aspects of gastroenterology training across Europe through a web-based 90-point questionnaire.

Materials and methods Physicians in their last year or who had recently finished their training, from 16 European countries, were invited to answer the questionnaire.

Results A total of 144 physicians answered the survey. A minimum number of procedures is required before completing training in nine of 16 countries (56 %). Overall, European trainees dedicate a median of 12 months (IQR 6–25) of their training period to endoscopy and a median of 3 months (IQR 0–6) to ultrasound. Training in interventional endoscopy was not always exhaustive, as about 50 % of participants performed fewer of several interventional procedures than was recommended by EBGH, most participants did not perform endoscopic hemostasis or endoscopic mucosal resection, and nearly a half of participants had no access to pancreatobiliary endoscopy training. Finally, up to 13 % of residents complete their training without the supervision of a mentor.

Conclusion In this large European survey, deep gaps and considerable differences in several gastroenterology training activities were found both among and within 16 European countries. Homogenization of educational programs and training opportunities across Europe is therefore necessary.

Publication History

Received: 02 July 2019

Accepted: 04 November 2019

Article published online:
23 March 2020

• References

• 1 Anderson P, Dalziel K, Davies E. et al. Survey of digestive health across Europe: Final report. Part 2: The economic impact and burden of digestive disorders. United European Gastroenterol J 2014; 2: 544-546
• 2 The Blue book of Gastroenterology. Available from: http://www.eubogh.org/blue-book/
• 3 Ianiro G, Gasbarrini A. Gastroenterology training in Europe: unmet educational needs beyond the machines. Gut 2016; 65: 185-187
• 4 European Specialty Examination in Gastroenterology & Hepatology. Available from: https://www.mrcpuk.org/mrcpuk-examinations/euro-specialty-examinations/esegh
• 5 Bisschops R, Wilmer A, Tack J. A survey on gastroenterology training in Europe. Gut 2002; 50: 724-729
• 6 Patel K, Rajendran A, Faiz O. et al. An international survey of polypectomy training and assessment. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5: E190-E197
• 7 Jirapinyo P, Imaeda AB, Thompson CC. Endoscopic training in gastroenterology fellowship: adherence to core curriculum guidelines. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 3570-3578
• 8 Siau K, Anderson JT, Valori R. et al. Certification of UK gastrointestinal endoscopists and variations between trainee specialties: results from the JETS e-portfolio. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E551-E560
• 9 Ekkelenkamp VE, Koch AD, de Man RA. et al. Training and competence assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review. Gut 2016; 65: 607-615
• 10 Faigel DO, Baron TH, Lewis B. et al. Ensuring competence in endoscopy - prepared by the ASGE Taskforce on Ensuring Competence in Endoscopy. Oak Brook, IL: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; 2006: 1-31
• 11 Koch AD, Haringsma J, Schoon EJ. et al. Competence measurement during colonoscopy training: The use of self-assessment of performance measures. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 971-975
• 12 Ekkelenkamp VE, Koch AD, Rauws EA. et al. Competence development in ERCP: the learning curve of novice trainees. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 949-955
• 13 Siau K, Dunckley P, Valori R. et al. Changes in scoring of Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) forms and the impact on compe- tence assessment. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 770-778