CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2020; 08(03): E291-E300
DOI: 10.1055/a-1067-4563
Original article
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020

Self-expanding metal stents versus TIPS in treatment of refractory bleeding esophageal varices: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Babu P. Mohan
1   Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona, United States
,
Saurabh Chandan
2   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
,
Shahab R. Khan
1   Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona, United States
,
Rajesh Kotagiri
1   Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona, United States
,
Lena L. Kassab
3   Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Babatunde Olaiya
4   Internal Medicine, Marshfield Medical Center, Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States
,
Suresh Ponnada
5   Internal Medicine, Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital, Roanoke, Virginia, United States
,
Andrew Ofosu
6   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York, United States
,
Douglas G. Adler
7   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 06 August 2019

accepted after revision 15 October 2019

Publication Date:
21 February 2020 (online)

Abstract

Background and study aims Refractory and recurrent esophageal variceal (EV) bleeding can be life threatening. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) have been used as a “bridge” therapy. However, their role in the treatment protocol is not established due to paucity in data.

Methods We searched multiple databases from inception through May 2019 to identify studies that reported on SEMS and TIPS in refractory EV hemorrhage. Our primary goals were to analyze and compare the pooled all-cause mortality, immediate bleeding control and rebleeding rates.

Results Five hundred forty-seven patients from 21 studies were analyzed (SEMS: 12 studies, 176 patients; TIPS: 9 studies, 398 patients). The pooled rate of all-cause mortality with SEMS was 43.6 % (95 % CI 28.6–59.8, I2  = 38) and with TIPS was 27.9 % (95 % CI 16.3–43.6, I2  = 91). The pooled rate of immediate bleeding control with SEMS was 84.5 % (95 % CI 74–91.2, I2  = 40) and with TIPS was 97.9 % (95 % CI 87.7–99.7, I2  = 0). The pooled rate of rebleeding with SEMS was 19.4 % (95 % CI 11.9–30.4, I2  = 32) and with TIPS was 8.8 % (95 % CI 4.8–15.7, I2  = 40).

Conclusion Use of SEMS in refractory EV hemorrhage demonstrates acceptable immediate bleeding control with good technical success rate. Mortality and rebleeding rates were lesser with TIPS, however, its superiority and/ or inferiority cannot be validated due to limitations in the comparison methodology.

Supplementary material

 
  • References

  • 1 Garcia-Pagan JC, Reverter E, Abraldes JG. et al. Acute variceal bleeding. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 33: 46-54
  • 2 Reiberger T, Puspok A, Schoder M. et al. Austrian consensus guidelines on the management and treatment of portal hypertension (Billroth III). Wien Klin Wochenschr 2017; 129: 135-158
  • 3 de Franchis R. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2015; 63: 743-752
  • 4 Sharara AI, Rockey DC. Gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 669-681
  • 5 de Franchis R. Evolving consensus in portal hypertension. Report of the Baveno IV consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2005; 43: 167-176
  • 6 Garcia-Pagan JC, Caca K, Bureau C. et al. Early use of TIPS in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 2370-2379
  • 7 Goenka MK, Goenka U, Tiwary IK. et al. Use of self-expanding metal stents for difficult variceal bleed. Indian J Gastroenterol 2017; 36: 468-473
  • 8 Holster IL, Kuipers EJ, Van Buuren HR. et al. Self-expandable metal stents as definitive treatment for esophageal variceal bleeding. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 485-488
  • 9 Pfisterer N, Riedl F, Pachofszky T. et al. Outcomes after placement of a SX-ELLA oesophageal stent for refractory variceal bleeding-A national multicentre study. Liver Int 2019; 39: 290-298
  • 10 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The prisma statement. Annals Internal Med 2009; 151: 264-269
  • 11 Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC. et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000; 283: 2008-2012
  • 12 Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Europ J Epidemiol 2010; 25: 603-605
  • 13 Glenny A, Altman D, Song F. et al. Indirect comparisons of competing interventions. Health Technol Assess 2005; 9: 1-134
  • 14 de Franchis R. Revising consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno V consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2010; 53: 762-768
  • 15 DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-188
  • 16 Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR. et al. Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. John Wiley & Sons Ltd New York 2000; 205-228
  • 17 Higgins J, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. A re‐evaluation of random‐effects meta‐analysis. Stat Med 2009; 172: 137-159
  • 18 Riley RD, Higgins JP, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ 2011; 342: d549
  • 19 Mohan BP, Adler DG. Heterogeneity in systematic review and meta-analysis: how to read between the numbers. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 902-903
  • 20 Kanwal F, White D. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 11: 1184-1186
  • 21 Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ. et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557
  • 22 Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R. et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 1294-1302
  • 23 Easterbrook PJ, Gopalan R, Berlin JA. et al. Publication bias in clinical research. The Lancet 1991; 8746: 867-872
  • 24 Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000; 56: 455-463
  • 25 Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M. Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. John Wiley & Sons; 2006
  • 26 Dechene A, El Fouly AH, Bechmann LP. et al. Acute management of refractory variceal bleeding in liver cirrhosis by self-expanding metal stents. Digestion 2012; 85: 185-191
  • 27 Drastich P, Brezina J, Sperl J. et al. Treatment of uncontrollable acute variceal bleeding with self-expanding metal stent: A single center experience. Gastroenterology 2016; 1: S339
  • 28 Escorsell A, Pavel O, Cardenas A. et al. Esophageal balloon tamponade versus esophageal stent in controlling acute refractory variceal bleeding: A multicenter randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology 2016; 63: 1957-1967
  • 29 Fierz FC, Kistler W, Stenz V. et al. Treatment of esophageal variceal hemorrhage with self-expanding metal stents as a rescue maneuver in a swiss multicentric cohort. Case Rep 2013; 7: 97-105
  • 30 Mishin I, Zastavnitsky G, Ghidirim G. et al. Self-expanding metal stents: A new hemostasis method for bleeding esophageal varices. Hepatol Int 2013; 1: S540
  • 31 Muller M, Seufferlein T, Perkhofer L. et al. Self-expandable metal stents for persisting esophageal variceal bleeding after band ligation or injection-therapy: a retrospective study. PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0126525
  • 32 Wright G, Lewis H, Hogan B. et al. A self-expanding metal stent for complicated variceal hemorrhage: experience at a single center. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 71-78
  • 33 Zakaria MS, Hamza IM, Mohey MA. et al. The first Egyptian experience using new self-expandable metal stents in acute esophageal variceal bleeding: pilot study. Saudi J 2013; 19: 177-181
  • 34 Zehetner J, Shamiyeh A, Wayand W. et al. Results of a new method to stop acute bleeding from esophageal varices: implantation of a self-expanding stent. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 2149-2152
  • 35 Cello JP, Ring EJ, Olcott EW. et al. Endoscopic sclerotherapy compared with percutaneous transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt after initial sclerotherapy in patients with acute variceal hemorrhage. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 858-865
  • 36 Garcia-Pagan JC, Di Pascoli M, Caca K. et al. Use of early-TIPS for high-risk variceal bleeding: results of a post-RCT surveillance study. J Hepatol 2013; 58: 45-50
  • 37 Monescillo A, Martinez-Lagares F, Ruiz-del-Arbol L. et al. Influence of portal hypertension and its early decompression by TIPS placement on the outcome of variceal bleeding. Hepatology 2004; 40: 793-801
  • 38 Popovic P, Stabuc B, Skok P. et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus endoscopic sclerotherapy in the elective treatment of recurrent variceal bleeding. J Int Med Res 2010; 38: 1121-1133
  • 39 Rudler M, Cluzel P, Corvec TL. et al. Early-TIPSS placement prevents rebleeding in high-risk patients with variceal bleeding, without improving survival. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014; 40: 1074-8010
  • 40 Shi Y, Tian X, Hu J. et al. Efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with adjunctive embolotherapy with cyanoacrylate for esophageal variceal bleeding. Dig Dis Sci 2014; 59: 2325-2332
  • 41 Xue H, Zhang M, Pang JX. et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt vs endoscopic therapy in preventing variceal rebleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 7341-7347
  • 42 Orloff MJ, Vaida F, Haynes KS. et al. Randomized controlled trial of emergency transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus emergency portacaval shunt treatment of acute bleeding esophageal varices in cirrhosis. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 2094-2111
  • 43 Hogan B, Patch D, Burroughs A. et al. Use of the sx-ella self-expanding mesh metal stent in the management of complex variceal haemorrhage: initial experience in a single centre. J Hepatol 2009; 50: S86-S87
  • 44 Hubmann R, Bodlaj G, Czompo M. et al. The use of self-expanding metal stents to treat acute esophageal variceal bleeding. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 896-901
  • 45 Puhan MA, Schunemann HJ, Murad MH. et al. A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis. BMJ 2014; 349: g5630
  • 46 McCarty TR, Njei B. Self-expanding metal stents for acute refractory esophageal variceal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig 2016; 28: 539-547
  • 47 Marot A, Trepo E, Doerig C. et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: self-expanding metal stents in patients with cirrhosis and severe or refractory oesophageal variceal bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015; 42: 1250-1260
  • 48 Shao XD, Qi XS, Guo XZ. Esophageal stent for refractory variceal bleeding: a systemic review and meta-analysis. BioMed Research Int 2016; 2016: 4054513
  • 49 Qi X, Jia J, Bai M. et al. Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for Acute Variceal Bleeding: A Meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2015; 49: 495-505