Rofo 2020; 192(05): 422-430
DOI: 10.1055/a-1030-4631
Review
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

NEN: Advancement in Diagnosis and Minimally Invasive Therapy

NET: Neue Entwicklungen in Diagnostik und minimalinvasiver Therapie
Daniel Putzer
Radiology, Interventional Oncology – Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria
,
Peter Schullian
Radiology, Interventional Oncology – Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria
,
Werner Jaschke
Radiology, Interventional Oncology – Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria
,
Reto Bale
Radiology, Interventional Oncology – Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

04 April 2019

09 October 2019

Publication Date:
20 November 2019 (online)

Abstract

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are a heterogeneous type of malignant disease and frequently present with symptoms caused by the secretion of metabolically active substances or the manifestation of distant metastases, with the liver being the most frequent site of spreading. Early diagnosis of metastatic disease is recognized as the major prognostic factor in NEN patients. Complete surgical resection is feasible in only selected cases. For patients with unresectable liver metastases, various locoregional treatment approaches are available. Over the last decade, therapeutic procedures including locoregional and systemic treatments have been investigated for gastroenteropancreatic NEN (GEP-NEN), especially for metastatic disease to the liver. Only a few prospective clinical trials have compared these approaches, and the management of individual patients remains subject to clinical expertise and judgement. Locoregional treatments are applicable in patients with limited metastatic involvement of the liver, and may be used for tumor debulking and symptom control in patients with diffuse liver involvement.

Key Points:

  • Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NENs) represent a heterogeneous class of rare malignancies.

  • Surgery is the treatment of choice for primary non-metastatic NEN.

  • The liver is the most frequently affected site by neuroendocrine metastases.

  • In limited metastastic liver disease local curative treatment may be accomplished by surgical resection or percutaneous thermal ablation.

  • Multi-probe stereotactic thermal ablation with image fusion for intraoperative evaluation of a sufficient safety margin allows for safe and effective treatment of large liver metastases.

Citation Format

  • Putzer D, Schullian P, Jaschke W et al. NET: Neue Entwicklungen in Diagnostik und minimalinvasiver Therapie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2020; 192: 422 – 430

Zusammenfassung

Neuroendokrine Tumoren (NET) bilden eine heterogene Entität maligner Erkrankungen und werden häufig durch Symptome manifest, die durch die Ausscheidung metabolisch aktiver Substanzen oder durch Fernmetastasen hervorgerufen werden, wobei Metastasen der Leber häufig auftreten. Die frühzeitige Diagnose einer metastasierten Erkrankung gilt als der wichtigste Prognosefaktor für NET-Patienten. Eine vollständige chirurgische Resektion ist nur in ausgewählten Fällen möglich. Für Patienten mit nicht resezierbaren Lebermetastasen stehen verschiedene lokoregionäre Behandlungsansätze zur Verfügung. In den letzten zehn Jahren wurden therapeutische Verfahren einschließlich lokoregionärer und systemischer Behandlungen für gastroenteropankreatische NET (GEP-NET), insbesondere für Lebermetastasen, untersucht. Nur wenige prospektive klinische Studien zielen darauf ab, diese Ansätze zu vergleichen, und das Management einzelner Patienten unterliegt weiterhin klinischem Fachwissen und Urteilsvermögen. Lokal ablative Verfahren stellen ein effektives therapeutisches Verfahren für Patienten dar, die einem kurativen Therapieansatz zugänglich sind, und können ebenso zur Tumorreduktion und Symptomkontrolle bei Patienten mit multifokaler Metastasierung der Leber verwendet werden.

Kernaussagen:

  • Neuroendokrine Neoplasien (NENs) sind eine heterogene Gruppe von seltenen Malignomen.

  • Bei primären nicht metastasierten NENs gilt die chirurgische Resektion als Therapie der ersten Wahl.

  • Metastasen von neuroendokrinen Tumoren befallen am häufigsten die Leber.

  • Eine limitierte Lebermetastasierung kann mittels chirurgischer Resektion oder thermischer Ablation mit kurativer Zielsetzung behandelt werden.

  • Die stereotaktische thermische Ablation mit multiplen Nadeln und Bildfusion zur intraoperativen Kontrolle eines ausreichenden Sicherheitssaums erlaubt eine sichere und effektive Behandlung von großen Lebermetastasen.

 
  • References

  • 1 Niederle MB, Hackl M, Kaserer K. et al. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: the current incidence and staging based on the WHO and European Neuroen- docrine Tumour Society classification: an analysis based on prospectively collected pa- rameters. Endocr Relat Cancer 2010; 17: 909-918
  • 2 Modlin IM, Lye KD, Kidd M. A 5­decade analysis of 13715 carcinoid tumors. Cancer 2003; 97: 934-959
  • 3 Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A. et al. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3063-3072
  • 4 Stump R, Haueis S, Kalt N. et al. Transplantation and surgical strategies in patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases: protocol of four systematic reviews. JMIR Res Protoc 2013; 2: e58
  • 5 Rindi G, Arnold R, Bosman F. et al. Nomenclature and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system. In: Bosman FT. et al. editor WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System. Lyon: IARC Press; 2010: 13­14
  • 6 Saxena A, Chua TC, Sarkar A. et al. Progression and survival results after radical hepatic metastasectomy of indolent advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) supports an aggressive surgical approach. Surgery 2011; 149: 209-220
  • 7 Pape UF, Berndt U, Müller-Nordhorn J. et al. Prognostic factors of long­term outcome in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Endocr Relat Cancer 2008; 15: 1083-1097
  • 8 Norton JA, Warren RS, Kelly MG. et al. Aggressive surgery for metastatic liver neuroendocrine tumors. Surgery 2003; 134: 1057-1063
  • 9 Mayo SC, de Jong MC, Pulitano C. et al. Surgical management of hepatic neuroendocrine tumor metastasis: results from an international multi-institutional analysis. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2010; 17: 3129-3136
  • 10 Pavel M, Baudin E, Couvelard E. et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Liver and Other Distant Metastases from Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of Foregut, Midgut, Hindgut, and Unknown Primary. Neuroendocrinology 2012; 95: 157-176
  • 11 Glazer ES, Tseng JF, Al-Refaie W. et al. Long-term survival after surgical management of neuroendocrine hepatic metastases. HPB 2010; 12: 427-433
  • 12 Rinke A, Wittenberg M, Schade-Brittinger C. et al. Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized Study on the Effect of Octreotide LAR in the Control of Tumor Growth in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Midgut Tumors (PROMID): Results of Long-Term Survival. Neuroendocrinology 2017; 104: 26-32
  • 13 Michael M, Garcia-Carbonero R, Weber MM. et al. The Antiproliferative Role of Lanreotide in Controlling Growth of Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review. Oncologist 2017; 22: 272-285
  • 14 Eriksson B, Klöppel G, Krenning E. et al. Consensus guidelines for the management of pa- tients with digestive neuroendocrine tumors – well-differentiated jejunal-ileal tumor/carcinoma. Neuroendocrinology 2008; 87: 8-19
  • 15 Ruszniewski P, Ish-Shalom S, Wymenga M. et al. Rapid and sustained relief from the symptoms of carcinoid syndrome: results from an open 6-month study of the 28-day prolonged-re- lease formulation of lanreotide. Neuroendocrinology 2004; 80: 244-251
  • 16 Yao J, Guthrie K, Moran C. et al. SWOG S0518: phase III prospective randomized comparison of depot octreotide plus interferon alpha-2b versus depot octreotide plus bevacizumab (NSC #704865) in advanced, poor prognosis carcinoid patients (NCT00569127). J Clin Oncol 2015 33(suppl):abstr 4004
  • 17 Walter T, Brixi-Benmansour H, Lombard-Bohas C. et al. New treatment strategies in advanced neuroendocrine tumours. Dig Liver Dis 2012; 44: 95-105
  • 18 Kouvaraki MA, Ajani JA, Hoff P. et al. Fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and streptozocin in the treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic endocrine carcinomas. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 4762-4771
  • 19 Delaunoit T, Ducreux M, Boige V. et al. The doxorubicin­streptozotocin combination for the treatment of advanced well-­differentiated pancreatic endocrine carcinoma; a judicious option?. Eur J Cancer 2004; 40: 515-520
  • 20 Strosberg JR, Cheema A, Kvols LK. A review of systemic and liver­directed therapies for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic tract. Cancer Control 2011; 18: 127-137
  • 21 Moertel CG, Kvols LK, O’Connell MJ. et al. Treatment of neuroendocrine carcinomas with combined etoposide and cisplatin. Evidence of major therapeutic activity in the anaplastic variants of these neoplasms. Cancer 1991; 68: 227-232
  • 22 Yao JC, Pavel M, Lombard-Bohas C. et al. Everolimus for the Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Overall Survival and Circulating Biomarkers From the Randomized, Phase III RADIANT-3 Study. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34: 3906-3913
  • 23 Raymond E, Dahan L, Raoul JL. et al. Sunitinib malate for the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 501-513
  • 24 Bodei L, Ferone D, Grana CM. et al. Peptide receptor therapies in neuroendocrine tumors. J Endocrinol Invest 2009; 32: 360­-369
  • 25 Kwekkeboom DJ, Kam BL, van Essen M. et al. Somatostatin­receptor­based imaging and therapy of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endocr Relat Cancer 2010; 17: R53-R73
  • 26 Bodei L, Kwekkeboom DJ, Kidd M. et al. Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogue Therapy Of Gastroenteropancreatic Cancer. Semin Nucl Med 2016; 46: 225-238
  • 27 van Essen M, Krenning EP, Bakker WH. et al. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu­octreotate in patients with foregut carcinoid tumours of bronchial, gastric and thymic origin. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007; 34: 1219-1227
  • 28 Strosberg J, El-Haddad G, Wolin E. et al. Phase 3 Trial of (177)Lu­Dotatate for Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 125-135
  • 29 Sundin A, Arnold R, Baudin E. et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Radiological, Nuclear Medicine & Hybrid Imaging. Neuroendocrinology 2017; 105: 212-244
  • 30 Putzer D, Gabriel M, Henninger B. et al. Bone metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumor: 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide PET in comparison to CT and bone scintigraphy. J Nucl Med 2009; 50: 1214-1221
  • 31 Gabriel M, Decristoforo C, Kendler D. et al. 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide PET in neuroendocrine tumors: comparison with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and CT. J Nucl Med 2007; 48: 508-518
  • 32 Klöppel G, Couvelard A, Perren A. et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Towards a Standardized Approach to the Diagnosis of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Their Prognostic Stratification. Neuroendocrinology 2009; 90: 162-166
  • 33 Chiti A, Fanti S, Savelli G. et al. Comparison of somatostatin receptor imaging, computed tomography and ultrasound in the clinical management of neuroendocrine gastro-entero-pancreatic tumours. Eur J Nucl Med 1998; 25: 1396-1403
  • 34 Dahdaleh FS, Lorenzen A, Rajput M. et al. The value of preoperative imaging in small bowel neuroendocrine tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 1912-1917
  • 35 Kumbasar B, Kamel IR, Tekes A. et al. Imaging of neuroendocrine tumors: accuracy of helical CT versus SRS. Abdom Imaging 2004; 29: 696-702
  • 36 Hubalewska-Dydejczyk A, Fröss-Baron K, Mikołajczak R. et al. 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-octreotate scintigraphy, an efficient method for the detection and staging of carcinoid tumours: results of 3 years’ experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006; 33: 1123-1133
  • 37 Duran R, Ronot M, Kerbaol A. et al. Hepatic hemangiomas: factors associated with T2 shine-through effect on diffusion-weighted MR sequences. Eur J Radiol 2014; 83: 468-478
  • 38 Dromain C, de Baere T, Baudin E. et al. MR imaging of hepatic metastases caused by neuroendocrine tumors: comparing four techniques. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 121-128 . Reubi JC: Peptide receptor expression in GEP-NET. Virchows Arch 2007;451(suppl 1): S47-S50
  • 39 Yang J, Kan Y, Ge BH. et al. Diagnostic role of Gallium-68 DOTATOC and Gallium-68 DOTATATE PET in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis. Acta Radiol 2014; 55: 389-398
  • 40 Johnbeck CB, Knigge U, Kjær A. PET tracers for somatostatin receptor imaging of neuroendocrine tumors: current status and review of the literature. Future Oncol 2014; 10: 2259-2277
  • 41 Geijer H, Breimer LH. Somatostatin receptor PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumours: update on systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013; 40: 1770-1180
  • 42 Treglia G, Castaldi P, Rindi G. et al. Diagnostic performance of Gallium-68 somatostatin receptor PET and PET/CT in patients with thoracic and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a meta-analysis. Endocrine 2012; 42: 80-87
  • 43 Putzer D, Gabriel M, Kendler D. et al. Comparison of (68)Ga-DOTA-Tyr(3)-octreotide and (18)F-fluoro-L-dihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography in neuroendocrine tumor patients. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010; 54: 68-75
  • 44 Dromain C, Déandréis D, Scoazec JY. et al. Diagn Interv Imaging. Imaging of neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas 2016; 97: 1241-1257
  • 45 Rindi G, Klöppel G, Ahlman H. et al. TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 2006; 449: 395-401
  • 46 Rindi G, Klöppel G, Couvelard A. et al. TNM staging of midgut and hindgut (neuro) endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 2007; 451: 757-762
  • 47 Scigliano S, Lebtahi R, Maire F. et al. Clinical and imaging follow­up after exhaustive liver resection of endocrine metastases: a 15-year monocentric experience. Endocr Relat Cancer 2009; 16: 977-990
  • 48 Grandhi MS, Lafaro KJ, Pawlik TM. Role of Locoregional and Systemic Approaches for the Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19: 2273-2282
  • 49 Sarmiento JM, Heywood G, Rubin J. et al. Surgical treatment of neuroendocrine metastases to the liver: a plea for resection to increase survival. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 197: 29-37
  • 50 Elias D, Lasser P, Ducreux M. et al. Liver resection (and associated extrahepatic resections) for metastatic well differentiated endocrine tumors: a 15-year single-center prospective study. Surgery 2003; 133: 375-382
  • 51 Chamberlain R, Canes D, Brown K. et al. Hepatic neuroendocrine metastases: does intervention alter outcomes?. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 190: 432-445
  • 52 Chen H, Hardacre J, Uzar A. et al. Isolated liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors: does resection prolong survival?. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 187: 88-92
  • 53 Kianmanesh R, O’Toole D, Sauvanet A. et al. Surgical treatment of gastric, enteric, and pancreatic endocrine tumors. Part 2. Treatment of hepatic metastases. J Chir (Paris) 2005; 142: 208-219
  • 54 Frilling A, Li J, Malamutmann E. et al. Treatment of liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumours in relation to the extent of hepatic disease. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 175-184
  • 55 Mazzaferro V, Pulvirenti A, Coppa J. Neuroendocrine tumors metastatic to the liver: how to select patients for liver transplantation?. J Hepatol 2007; 47: 460-466
  • 56 Delle Fave G, O’Toole D, Sundin A. et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines update for gastroduodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology 2016; 103: 119-124
  • 57 Gibril F, Schumann M, Pace A. et al. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: a prospective study of 107 cases and comparison with 1009 cases from the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2004; 83: 43-48
  • 58 Sato Y, Hashimoto S, Mizuno K. et al. Management of gastric and duodenal neuroendocrine tumors. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22: 6817-6828
  • 59 Hoffmann KM, Furukawa M, Jensen RT. Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors: classification, functional syndromes, diagnosis and medical treatment. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2005; 19: 675-697
  • 60 Niederle B, Pape UF, Costa F. et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines update for neuroendocrine neoplasms of the jejunum and ileum. Neuroendocrinology 2016; 103: 125-138
  • 61 Halfdanarson TR, Rabe KG, Rubin J. et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs): incidence, prognosis and recent trend toward improved survival. Ann Oncol 2008; 19: 1727-1733
  • 62 Jensen RT, Cadiot G, Brandi ML. et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms: functional pancreatic endocrine tumor syndromes. Neuroendocrinology 2012; 95: 98-119
  • 63 Ramage JK, De Herder WW, Delle Fave G. et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines update for colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology 2016; 103: 139-143
  • 64 Caplin ME, Baudin E, Ferolla P. et al. Pulmonary neuroendocrine (carcinoid) tumors: European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society expert consensus and recommendations for best practice for typical and atypical pulmonary carcinoids. Ann Oncol 2015; 26: 1604-1620
  • 65 de Baere T, Deschamps F, Tselikas L. et al. GEP-NETS update: interventional radiology: role in the treatment of liver metastases from GEP-NETs. Eur J Endocrinol 2015; 172: R151-R166
  • 66 Pavel M, O’Toole D, Costa F. et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for the Management of Distant Metastatic Disease of Intestinal, Pancreatic, Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN) and NEN of Unknown Primary Site. Neuroendocrinology 2016; 103: 172-185
  • 67 Reddy SK, Clary BM. Neuroendocrine liver metastases. Surg Clin North Am 2010; 90: 853-861
  • 68 Bacchetti S, Bertozzi S, Londero AP. et al. Surgical treatment and survival in patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors: a meta­analysis of observational studies. Int J Hepatol 2013; 2013: 235040
  • 69 Maxwell JE, Sherman SK, O'Dorisio TM. et al. Liver-Directed Surgery of Neuroendocrine Metastases: What is the Optimal Strategy?. Surgery 2016; 159: 320-335
  • 70 Tsoli M, Chatzellis E, Koumarianou A. et al. Current best practice in the management of neuroendocrine tumors. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab 2018; 10: 1-18
  • 71 Grozinsky-Glasberg S, Thomas D, Strosberg JR. et al. Metastatic type 1 gastric carcinoid: a real threat or just a myth?. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 8687-8695
  • 72 Steinmüller T, Kianmanesh R, Falconi M. et al. Consensus guidelines for the management of patients with liver metastases from digestive (neuro)endocrine tumors: foregut, midgut, hindgut, and unknown primary. Neuroendocrinology 2008; 87: 47­-62
  • 73 Bale R, Widmann G, Stoffner DI. Stereotaxy: breaking the limits of current radiofrequency ablation techniques. European journal of radiology 2010; 75: 32-36
  • 74 Bale R, Schullian P, Eberle G. et al. Stereotactic Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Histopathological Study in Explanted Livers. Hepatology 2019; 70: 840-850
  • 75 Grandhi MS, Lafaro KJ, Pawlik TM. Role of Locoregional and Systemic Approaches for the Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19: 2273-2282
  • 76 Akyildiz HY, Mitchell J, Milas M. et al. Laparoscopic radiofrequency thermal ablation of neuroendocrine hepatic metastases: long­term follow­up. Surgery 2010; 148: 1288-1293
  • 77 Lewis MA, Hubbard J. Multimodal liver­directed management of neuroendocrine hepatic metastases. Int J Hepatol 2011; 2011: 452343
  • 78 Mohan H, Nicholson P, Winter DC. et al. Radiofrequency Ablation for Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26: 935-942
  • 79 Pawlik T, Izzo F, Cohen D. et al. Combined resection and radiofrequency ablation for advanced hepatic malignancies: results in 172 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10: 1059-1069
  • 80 Evard S, Becouarn Y, Fonck M. et al. Surgical treatment of liver metastases by radiofrequency ablation, resection, or in combina- tion. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004; 30: 399-406
  • 81 Vogl TJ, Naguib NN, Zangos S. et al. Liver metastases of neuroendocrine carcinomas: interventional treatment via transarterial embolization, chemoembolization and thermal ablation. Eur J Radiol 2009; 72: 517-­528
  • 82 Memon K, Lewandowski RJ, Riaz A. et al. Chemoembolization and radioembolization for metastatic disease to the liver: available data and future studies. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2012; 13: 403-­415
  • 83 Widmann G, Schullian P, Haidu M. et al. Stereotactic Radiofrequency Ablation (SRFA) of Liver Lesions: Technique Effectiveness, Safety, and Interoperator Performance. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology 2012; 35: 570-580
  • 84 Mohan H, Nicholson P, Winter DC. et al. Radiofrequency ablation for neuroendocrine liver metastases: a systematic review. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26: 935-942
  • 85 Cazzato RL, Garnon J, Ramamurthy N. et al. 18F­FDOPA PET/CT­Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Metastases from Neuroendocrine Tumours: Technical Note on a Preliminary Experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016; 39: 1315-1321
  • 86 Landry CS, Scoggins CR, McMasters KM. et al. Management of hepatic metastasis of gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors. J Surg Oncol 2008; 97: 253-258
  • 87 Memon K, Lewandowski RJ, Riaz A. et al. Chemoembolization and radioembolization for metastatic disease to the liver: available data and future studies. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2012; 13: 403-415
  • 88 Ejaz A, Reames BN, Maithel S. et al. The impact of extrahepatic disease among patients undergoing liver-directed therapy for neuroendocrine liver metastasis. J Surg Oncol 2017; 116: 841-847
  • 89 Grozinsky-Glasberg S, Kaltsas G, Kaltsatou M. et al. Hepatic intraarterial therapies in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors: lessons from clinical practice. Endocrine 2018; 60: 499-509
  • 90 Mayo SC, de Jong MC, Bloomston M. et al. Surgery versus intraarterial therapy for neuroendocrine liver metastasis: a multicenter international analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 3657-3665
  • 91 Coriat R, Walter T, Terris B. et al. Gastroenteropancreatic well-differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors: Review and position statement. Oncologist 2016; 21: 1191-1199