Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2020; 08(02): E221-E227
DOI: 10.1055/a-1027-6708
Original article
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of gastric varices with coil embolization and absorbable hemostatic gelatin sponge: a novel alternative to cyanoacrylate

Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
3   Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Thomas J. Wang
2   Department of Internal Medicine. Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, Massachusetts, United States
3   Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Christopher C. Thompson
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
3   Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Marvin Ryou
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
3   Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 17 April 2019

accepted after revision 15 July 2019

Publication Date:
28 January 2020 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Background and study aims Bleeding from gastric varices (GV) carries high morbidity and mortality. Current endoscopic therapies are premised on cyanoacrylate injection which is technically challenging and carries risk of embolization. We present a case series of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided coil injection in combination with hemostatic absorbable gelatin sponge (AGS) for treatment of bleeding gastric varices.

Patients and methods This was a retrospective review of EUS-guided coil injection for bleeding GV since November 2017. After EUS-guided needle puncture, hemostatic coils were serially injected until significant reduction of Doppler flow. Under fluoroscopic guidance, test contrast was injected to confirm absence of run-off, at which time AGS, converted into a liquid slurry, was injected as hemostatic reinforcement.

Results Ten consecutive patients underwent EUS-guided coil embolization reinforced by AGS. Technical success, defined as uncomplicated injection of coils and sponge was achieved in 100 % (10/10). Mean follow-up was 6 months 73–397 days; No patients rebled or required reintervention on GV. The complication rate was 10 % (1/10; severe abdominal pain without radiographic findings); otherwise, there were no cases of systemic embolization. Nine of 10 patients (90 %) had follow-up EUS (mean 80 days); 100 % (9/9) revealed near-obliteration of GV.

Conclusion EUS-guided coil embolization in combination with hemostatic AGS is a novel method for management of bleeding GV with high clinical and technical success rates, low risk for complications and favorable safety profile when compared to cyanoacrylate. This technique theoretically minimizes embolic complications and need for re-intervention. Further studies are required to compare this modality.