Subscribe to RSS
Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research: 2020 Update
15 October 2019 (online)
For publication in the International Journal of Sports Medicine (IJSM), studies must have been conducted in accordance with recognised ethical standards and national/international laws. At the very first stage of paper submission, authors are required to confirm that these standards and laws have been adhered to by reading this editorial. Authors who do not provide any information regarding ethical approval will have their manuscripts rejected before it enters the peer-review process, without any option to resubmit.
Research opportunities, methods and the contextual environment are continually evolving. While the four basic principles of biomedical ethics are, arguably, timeless , changes to data collection processes as well as research designs and settings bring changes to ethical considerations. In the original 2009 IJSM editorial , we described the ethical considerations embedded into national/international laws and provided specific guidance on the ethical issues which commonly arise in Sports Medicine research. In 2011, this information was updated to recognise the ethical principles of other professional associations and treaties when conducting research involving human participants . Additional information was also provided on the use of Laboratory Animals in research, and on the links between sample size and research ethics. In the second update , published in 2014, we elaborated on the ethical issues relating to the investigation of doping agents; the use of animals for answering research questions that appear to be solely focussed on the enhancement of athletic performance; and sample size in the context of the burden to individual research participants. In 2016, we updated some of the guidelines to account for the changes made to the Declaration of Helsinki in 2013, covered the use of social media in research, provided guidance on how researchers can feed back their incidental and pertinent findings to research participants, covered some of the issues relating to studies involving children, and outlined the difference between a full and pilot study in terms of desired number of participants . In the last update (2018), we clarified issues surrounding the use of a gatekeeper for accessing personal data on participants, as well as issues surrounding consent and the associated information to participants . We covered other issues including, breaches of confidentiality, use of personal identifiable information, open access data and secondary analysis of data. We also highlighted the important considerations for use of placebos and research involving participant deception.
In this, our new update for 2020 onwards, we provide the following revisions and additions;
More detail on how to ensure consent/assent is truly informed.
More detail on issues in secondary data analysis projects, and in particular research using data already collected from athletes as part of their contractual obligations with club and/or country.
More detail on factors to consider when undertaking pre-study risk analysis and in study design.
Information on the application of the Principle of Justice ; with particular regard to gender imbalance in sampling.
Minor text changes to correct typographic errors and to clarify statements carried forward from previous versions.
Minor changes to the order and layout to enhance readability and usability and reduce areas of overlap.
- 1 Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 7th Edition New York: Oxford University Press; 2013
- 2 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. International journal of sports medicine – ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2009; 30: 701-702
- 3 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
- 4 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2014 update. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 1025-1028
- 5 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2016 update. Int J Sports Med 2015; 36: 1121-1124
- 6 Harriss DJ, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Standards for ethics in sport and exercise science research: 2018 update. Int J Sports Med 2017; 38: 1126-1131
- 7 Costello JT, Bieuzen F, Bleakley CM. Where are all the female participants in sports and exercise medicine research?. Eur J Sport Sci 2014; 14: 847-851
- 8 World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013; 310: 2191-2194
- 9 Eudra Lex – Volume 10 - Clinical trials guidelines. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/health/documents/eudralex/vol-10 (Accessed September 2019)
- 10 Mental Capacity Act 2005 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/introduction
- 11 Nuffield Council on Bioethics: Children and Clinical Research Ethical Issues. HRA Response to Report Recommendations Relevant to the Health Research Authority (HRA) and Research Ethics Committees (RECs). Available at http://www.hra.nhs.uk/documents/2015/08/hra-response-ncob-children-clinical-research-recommendations-hra-recs-v1-0-final.pdf
- 12 International Sociological Association, Code of Ethics Madrid: International Sociological Association. 2001; Available at http://www.isa-sociology.org/about/isa_code_of_ethics.htm
- 13 Medical Research Council. MRC ethics series: Good research practice 2005. London: Medical Research Council; 2005: 1-16
- 14 Hughes J, Hunter D, Sheehan M, Wilkinson SD, Wrigley A, Hughes J. European Textbook on Ethics in Research. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2010. 203
- 15 Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 1996. 140
- 16 Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 2010. 248
- 17 Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, National Research Council. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals – report in brief. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 2010. Available at http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/materials-based-on-reports/special-products/guide_lab_animals_final.pdf
- 18 Kregel KC. Resource book for the design of animal exercise protocols. Committee to develop an American physiological society resource book for the design of animal exercise protocols (2006) Available via; http://www.the-aps.org/pa/action/exercise/book.pdf Accessed 24 October 2013
- 19 Shephard RJ. Ethics in exercise science research. Sports Med 2002; 32: 169-183
- 20 The American Psychological Association Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Am Psychol 2002; 57: 1060-1073
- 21 World Anti-Doping Code World Anti-Doping Agency. Available at http://stage.wada-ama.org/Documents/World_Anti-Doping_Program/WADP-The-Code/WADA_Anti-Doping_CODE_2009_EN.pdf
- 22 Howman D. Scientific research using elite athletes: WADA point of view. J Appl Physiol 2013; 114: 1365-1365
- 23 Bacchetti P, Wolf LE, Segal MR, McCulloch CE. Ethics and sample size. Am J Epidemiol 2005; 161: 105-110
- 24 Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive Statistics for Studies in Sports Medicine and Exercise Science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 3-12
- 25 Ioannidis JP. Why most discovered true associations are inﬂated. Epidemiology 2008; 19: 640-648
- 26 https://www.nihr.ac.uk/funding-and-support/documents/funding-for-research-studies/research-programmes/PGfAR/CCF-PGfAR-Feasibility-and-Pilot-studies.pdf