Download PDF
physiopraxis 2019; 17(11/12): 26-29
DOI: 10.1055/a-1010-0240
Therapie
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart – New York

Die Macht der Worte – Placebo- und Nocebo-Effekte in der Physiotherapie

Geert Rutten∗
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 November 2019 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Das „Gute-Kita-Gesetz“ oder die „Respektrente“ – Politiker nutzen immer häufiger Frames, damit die Bürger ihre neuen Gesetze positiv wahrnehmen. Warum auch Physiotherapeuten diese Kommunikationsmethode nutzen sollten, bei der man durch die Formulierung beeinflusst, wie eine Botschaft ankommt, erklärt der niederländische Physiotherapeut Geert Rutten, der seit Jahren intensiv zu Placebo forscht.

 

  • Literaturverzeichnis

  • 1 Traeger AC, Henschke N, Hubscher M. et al Estimating the Risk of Chronic Pain: Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model (PICKUP) for Patients with Acute Low Back Pain. PLoS Med 2016; 13: e1002019 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002019
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Laferton JA, Kube T, Salzmann S. et al Patients’ Expectations Regarding Medical Treatment: A Critical Review of Concepts and Their Assessment. Front Psychol 2017; 8: 233 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00233
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Traeger AC, Hubscher M, Henschke N. et al Emotional distress drives health services overuse in patients with acute low back pain: a longitudinal observational study. Eur Spine J 2016; 25: 2767-2773 doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4461-0
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Blasini M, Corsi N, Klinger R. et al Nocebo and pain: An overview of the psychoneurobiological mechanisms. Pain Rep 2017: 2 doi:10.1097/PR9.0000000000000585
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Colloca L, Klinger R, Flor H. et al Placebo analgesia: psychological and neurobiological mechanisms. Pain 2013; 154: 511-514 doi:10.1016/j.pain.2013.02.002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Colloca L, Finniss D. Nocebo effects, patient-clinician communication, and therapeutic outcomes. JAMA 2012; 307: 567-568 doi:10.1001/jama.2012.115
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hauser W, Hansen E, Enck P. Nocebo phenomena in medicine: their relevance in everyday clinical practice. DtschArztebl Int 2012; 109: 459-465 doi:10.3238/arztebl.2012.0459
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Bensing JM, Verheul W. The silent healer: the role of communication in placebo effects. Patient Educ Couns 2010; 80: 293-299 doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.033
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kaptchuk TJ, Miller FG. Placebo Effects in Medicine. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 8-9 doi:10.1056/NEJMp1504023
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Testa M, Rossettini G. Enhance placebo, avoid nocebo: How contextual factors affect physiotherapy outcomes. Man Ther 2016; 24: 65-74 doi:10.1016/j.math.2016.04.006
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Jonas WB, Crawford C, Colloca L. To what extent are surgery and invasive procedures effective beyond a placebo response? A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised, sham controlled trials. BMJ Open 2015; 5: e009655 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009655
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Peerdeman KJ, van Laarhoven AI, Keij SM. et al Relieving patients’ pain with expectation interventions: a meta-analysis. Pain 2016; 157: 1179-1191 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009655
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rossettini G, Carlino E, Testa M. Clinical relevance of contextual factors as triggers of placebo and nocebo effects in musculoskeletal pain. BMC MusculoskeletDisord 2018; 19: 27 doi:10.1186/s12891-018-1943-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Maher CG. et al The therapeutic alliance between clinicians and patients predicts outcome in chronic low back pain. Phys Ther 2013; 93: 470-478 doi:10.2522/ptj.20120137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Babatunde F, MacDermid J, MacIntyre N. Characteristics of therapeutic alliance in musculoskeletal physiotherapy and occupational therapy practice: a scoping review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17: 375 doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2311-3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Pinto RZ, Ferreira ML, Oliveira VC. et al Patient-centred communication is associated with positive therapeutic alliance: a systematic review. J Physiother 2012; 58: 77-87 doi: 10.1016/S1836-9553(12)70087-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Taccolini Manzoni AC, Bastos de Oliveira NT, Nunes Cabral CM. et al The role of the therapeutic alliance on pain relief in musculoskeletal rehabilitation: A systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract 2018; 34: 901-915 doi:10.1080/09593985.2018.1431343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Benedetti F, Amanzio M. Mechanisms of the placebo response. PulmPharmacolTher 2013; 26: 520-523 doi:10.1016/j.pupt.2013.01.006
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Zou K, Wong J, Abdullah N. et al Examination of overall treatment effect and the proportion attributable to contextual effect in osteoarthritis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75: 1964-1970 doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Petersen GL, Finnerup NB, Colloca L. et al The magnitude of nocebo effects in pain: a meta-analysis. Pain 2014; 155: 1426-1434 doi:10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.016
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Elsenbruch S, Schmid J, Basler M. et al How positive and negative expectations shape the experience of visceral pain: an experimental pilot study in healthy women. NeurogastroenterolMotil 2012; 24: 914-e460 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01950.x
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Benedetti F. Placebo effects: from the neurobiological paradigm to translational implications. Neuron 2014; 84: 623-637 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.023
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Benedetti F. Drugs and placebos: what’s the difference?: Understanding the molecular basis of the placebo effect could help clinicians to better use it in clinical practice. EMBO Rep 2014; 15: 329-332 doi:10.1002/embr.201338399
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Cedraschi C, Allaz AF. How to identify patients with a poor prognosis in daily clinical practice. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2005; 19: 577-591
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 van der Naalt J, Timmerman ME, de Koning ME. et al Early predictors of outcome after mild traumatic brain injury (UPFRONT): an observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2017; 16: 532-540 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30117-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Corsi N, Colloca L. Placebo and Nocebo Effects: The Advantage of Measuring Expectations and Psychological Factors. Front Psychol 2017; 8: 308 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E. et al Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet 2001; 357: 757-762
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 O’Keeffe M, Cullinane P, Hurley J. et al What Influences Patient-Therapist Interactions in Musculoskeletal Physical Therapy? Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis. Phys Ther 2016; 96: 609-622 doi:10.2522/ptj.20150240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Dieppe P, Goldingay S, Greville-Harris M. The power and value of placebo and nocebo in painful osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2016; 24: 1850-1857 doi:10.1016/j.joca.2016.06.007
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Barnes K, Faasse K, Geers AL. et al Can Positive Framing Reduce Nocebo Side Effects? Current Evidence and Recommendation for Future Research. Front Pharmacol 2019; 10: 167 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Stortenbeker IA, Houwen J, Lucassen P. et al Quantifying positive communication: Doctor’s language and patient anxiety in primary care consultations. Patient Educ Couns 2018; 101: 1577-1584 doi:10.1016/j.pec.2018.05.002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Burgers C, Beukeboom CJ, Sparks L. How the doc should (not) talk: when breaking bad news with negations influences patients’ immediate responses and medical adherence intentions. Patient Educ Couns 2012; 89: 267-273 doi:10.1016/j.pec.2012.08.008
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Bartels DJP, van Laarhoven AIM, Stroo M. et al Minimizing nocebo effects by conditioning with verbal suggestion: A randomized clinical trial in healthy humans. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0182959 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182959
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Kok G, Gottlieb NH, Peters GJ. et al A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach. Health Psychol Rev 2016; 10: 297-312 doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1077155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kok G, Peters GY, Kessels LTE. et al Ignoring theory and misinterpreting evidence: the false belief in fear appeals. Health Psychol Rev 2018; 12: 111-125 doi:10.1080/17437199.2017.1415767
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 van Koningsbruggen GM, Das E, Roskos-Ewoldsen DR. How self-affirmation reduces defensive processing of threatening health information: evidence at the implicit level. Health Psychol 2009; 28: 563-568 doi:10.1037/a0015610
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Peters GY, Ruiter RAC, Ten Hoor GA. et al Towards consensus on fear appeals: a rejoinder to the commentaries on Kok, Peters, Kessels, ten Hoor, and Ruiter (2018). Health Psychol Rev 2018; 12: 151-156 doi:10.1080/17437199.2018.1454846
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Roberto AJ, Mongeau PA, Liu Y. A (Re)defining moment for fear appeals: a comment on Kok, et al. (2018). Health Psychol Rev 2018; 12: 144-146 doi:10.1080/17437199.2018.1445546
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Ruiter RA, Kessels LT, Peters GJ. et al Sixty years of fear appeal research: current state of the evidence. Int J Psychol 2014; 49: 63-70 doi:10.1002/ijop.12042
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 2001; 52: 1-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Epton T, Harris PR, Kane R. et al The impact of self-affirmation on health-behavior change: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol 2015; 34: 187-196 doi:10.1037/hea0000116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Evers AWM, Colloca L, Blease C. et al Implications of Placebo and Nocebo Effects for Clinical Practice: Expert Consensus. PsychotherPsychosom 2018; 87: 204-210 doi:10.1159/000490354
    Google Scholar