Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2020; 08(01): E92-E96
DOI: 10.1055/a-1005-6602
Original article
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020

EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: a learning curve modified by technical progress

Authors

  • Amy Tyberg

    1   Division of Gastroenterology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical Center, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
  • Kopal Jha

    2   Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States
  • Shawn Shah

    3   Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United Stats
  • Prashant Kedia

    4   Methodist Health System, Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Monica Gaidhane

    1   Division of Gastroenterology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical Center, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
  • Michel Kahaleh

    1   Division of Gastroenterology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical Center, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 23 April 2019

accepted after revision 06 August 2019

Publication Date:
08 January 2020 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Introduction Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is an efficacious and safe option for patients who cannot undergo cholecystectomy. It is a technically challenging procedure, requiring skills in EUS, and ERCP. The aim of this study was to define the learning curve for EUS-GBD.

Patients and methods Consecutive patients undergoing EUS-GBD by a single operator were included from a prospective registry over 5 years. Demographics, procedure information, post-procedure follow-up data, and information on adverse events were collected. Non-linear regression and CUSUM analyses were conducted for the learning curve. Clinical success was defined as resolution of cholecystitis post-procedure.

Results Forty-eight patients were included (58 % male, mean age 76 years). Twenty patients (42 %) had malignant cholecystitis. Most patients had lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) (15 mm, n = 29, 60 %; 10 mm, n = 8, 7 %). The remaining patients had FCSEMS (n = 9, 19 %) or plastic stents alone (n = 2, 4 %). Clinical success was achieved in 36 (86 %) of patients. Of the remaining 12, 7 were lost to follow-up and 5 had persistent cholecystitis. 9 patients (19 %) had adverse events including bleeding (n = 4), liver abscesses (n = 2), and hypotension. Two patients passed away post-procedure.

Median procedure time was 41 minutes (range 16 – 121 min), with the 41-minute time occurring during the 19th procedure. Procedure durations further reduced, with the last 10 procedures being 20 minutes or under (nonlinear regression p value P < 0.0001).

Conclusion Endoscopists experienced in EUS-GBD are expected to achieve a reduction in procedure time over successive cases, with efficiency reached at 41 minutes and a learning rate of 19 cases. Continued improvement is demonstrated with additional experience