CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2020; 08(04): E544-E547
DOI: 10.1055/a-0996-7975
Case report
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020

Cuffitis: is an endoscopic approach possible?

Mélanie Serrero
Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
,
Aurélia Santoni
Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
,
Jean-Charles Grimaud
Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
,
Ariadne Desjeux
Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
,
Jean-Michel Gonzalez
Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
,
Marc Barthet
Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 01 November 2018

accepted after revision 09 July 2019

Publication Date:
23 March 2020 (online)

Abstract

Background Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the reference surgical treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) refractory to medical treatment. One of the complications is leaving a strip of rectal mucosa which can be a cause of persistent inflammation or cuffitis. The objective of our study is to present an endoscopic approach for the treatment of cuffitis.

Methods This retrospective study included three patients who suffered from cuffitis after a proctocolectomy with IPAA for UC refractory to medical treatment. An endoscopic resection of the cuffitis was performed by the same operator. Two different techniques were used: hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for one patient and mucosectomy with cap and resection for the two others.

Results The endoscopic treatment was performed successfully in all three patients. The only complication observed was rectal bleeding which did not require endoscopic revision. The three patients are now asymptomatic.

Conclusion Endoscopic treatment of cuffitis appears to be an interesting approach with few complications in the short term and good clinical efficacy.

 
  • References

  • 1 Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. BMJ 1978; 2: 85-88
  • 2 Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM. et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 120-127
  • 3 Lovegrove RE, Constantinides VA, Heriot AG. et al. A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 18-26
  • 4 Gomollón F, Dignass A, Annese V. et al. 3rd European Evidence-based Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Crohn’s Disease 2016: Part 1: Diagnosis and Medical Management. J Crohns Colitis 2017; 11: 3-25
  • 5 Egan L, D’Inca R, Jess T. et al. Non-colorectal intestinal tract carcinomas in inflammatory bowel disease: results of the 3rd ECCO Pathogenesis Scientific Workshop (II). J Crohns Colitis 2014; 8: 19-30
  • 6 Shen B, Lashner BA, Bennett AE. et al. Treatment of rectal cuff inflammation (cuffitis) in patients with ulcerative colitis following restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 1527-1531
  • 7 Lavery IC, Sirimarco MT, Ziv Y. et al. Anal canal inflammation after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The need for treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 803-806
  • 8 Magro F, Gionchetti P, Eliakim R. et al. Third European Evidence-based Consensus on Diagnosis and Management of Ulcerative Colitis. Part 1: Definitions, Diagnosis, Extra-intestinal Manifestations, Pregnancy, Cancer Surveillance, Surgery, and Ileo-anal Pouch Disorders. J Crohns Colitis 2017; 11: 649-670
  • 9 Fazio VW, Tjandra JJ. Transanal mucosectomy. Ileal pouch advancement for anorectal dysplasia or inflammation after restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 1008-1011