Lückenschluss bei Hypodontie regio 25, 35 und 45 durch skelettale Verankerung

Zusammenfassung

Der vorliegende Patientenfall thematisiert den kieferorthopädischen Lückenschluss bei Nichtanlagen der Zähne 25, 35 und 45 mittels skelettalen Verankerungselementen und hat das Ziel einen kurzen Überblick zu klinischen Aspekten und Anwendungsmöglichkeiten zu geben. In diesem Zusammenhang wird unter anderem auch kurz auf Alternativen und die Einstellungsoption der Weisheitszähne eingegangen.

Abstract

The presented case report deals with orthodontic space closure of missing teeth 25, 35, and 45 by means of skeletal anchorage devices and provides a short overview of clinical aspects and possibilities of application. In this context, alternatives and adjustment options of wisdom teeth, for instance, are briefly discussed.

Schlüsselwörter

Nichtanlage von Zähnen - skelettale Verankerung - Gaumenimplantat - Mini-Implantate - Kortikalisschrauben

Key words

hypodontia - skeletal anchorage - palatal implant - mini-implants

• Literatur

• 1 De Coster PJ, Marks LA, Martens LC. et al. Dental agenesis: genetic and clinical perspectives. J Oral Pathol Med 2009; 38: 1-17
• 2 Polder BJ, Van’t Hof MA, Van der Linden FPGM. et al. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004; 32: 217-226
• 3 Laganà G, Lombardi CC, Franchi L. et al. Tooth agenesis: dento-skeletal characteristics in subjects with orthodontic treatment need. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2011; 12: 17-19
• 4 Bacetti T. A controlled study of associated dental anomalies. Angle Orthod 1998; 68: 267-274
• 5 McKeown HF, Robinson DL, Elcock C. et al. Tooth dimensions in hypodontia patients, their uneffected relatives and a control group measured by a new image and analysis system. Eur J Orthod 2002; 24: 131-141
• 6 Albashaireh ZS, Khader YS. The prevalence and pattern of hypodontia of the permanent teeth and crown size and shape deformity affecting upper lateral incisors in a sample of Jordanian dental patients. Community Dent Health 2006; 23: 239-243
• 7 Slayton RL, Qwilliams L, Murray JC. et al. Genetic association studies of cleft lip and/or palate with hypodontia outside the cleft region. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2003; 40: 274-279
• 8 Vieira AR. Oral Clefts and syndromic forms of tooth agenesis as models for genetics of isolated tooth agenesis. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 162-165
• 9 Uslenghi S, Liversidge HM, Wong FS. A radiographic study of tooth development in hypodontia. Arch Oral Biol 2006; 51: 129-133
• 10 Ezoddini AF, Sheikhha MH, Ahmadi H. Prevalence of dental developmental anomalies: a radiographic study. Connunity Dent Health 2007; 24: 140-144
• 11 Czochrowska EM, Stenvik A, Album B. et al. Autotransplantation of premolars to replace maxillary incisors: a comparison with natural incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118: 592-600
• 12 Czochrowska EM, Stenvik A, Bjercke B. et al. Outcome of tooth transplantation: survival and success rates 17-41 years posttreatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 121: 110-119
• 13 Czochrowska EM, Skaare AB, Stenvik A. et al. Outcome of orthodontic space closure with a missing maxillary central incisor. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123: 597-603
• 14 Paulsen HU, Andreasen JO. Eruption of premolars subsequent to autotransplantation. A longitudinal radiographic study. Eur J Orthod 1998; 20: 45-55
• 15 Glassmann SD. Autogenic tooth transplantation in the treatment of malocclusion. Dent Clin North Am 1981; 25: 109-116
• 16 Kalwizki M, Ney T, Göz G. Transplantation of a lower bicuspid after traumatic loss of three upper incisors. J Orofac Orthop 2003; 64: 57-66
• 17 Kruger E, Thomson WM, Konthasinghe P. Third molar outcomes from age 18 to 26: findings from a population-based new zealand longitudinal study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 92: 150-155
• 18 Kunkel et al. S2k-Leitlinie: Operative Entfernung von Weisheitszähnen 2012
• 19 Fernandes MJ, Ogden GR, Pitts NB. et al. Incidence of symptoms in previously symptom-free impacted lower third molars assessed in general dental practice. Br Den J 2009; 2017: E10
• 20 Chuang SK, Perott DH, Sursala SM. et al. Age as a risk facor for third molar surgery complications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65: 1685-1692
• 21 Lindquist und Thilander. Extraction of third molars in cases of anticipated crowding in the lower jaw. Am J Orthod 1982; 81: 130-139
• 22 Ades AG, Joondeph DR, Little RM. et al. A long-term study of the relationship of third molars to changes in the mandibular dental arch. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 97: 323-325
• 23 Artun J, Behbehani F, Thalib L. Predicition of maxillary third molar impaction in adolsecent orthodontic patients. Angel Orthod 2005; 75: 901-911
• 24 Kim YH, Yang SM, Kim S. et al. Midpalatal miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage: factors affecting clinical success. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 66-72
• 25 Miclotte A, Van Hevele J, Roels A. et al. Position of lower wisdom teeth and their relation to the alveolar nerve in orthodontic patients treated with and without extraction of premolars: a longitudinal study. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 1731-1739
• 26 Jung BA, Kunkel M. Skelettale Verankerungselemente- wissenschaftliches Update. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 2016: in press
• 27 Kim TW, Artun J, Behbehani F. et al. Prevalence of third molar impaction in orthodontic patients treated nonextraction and with extraction of 4 premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123: 138-145
• 28 Karagkiolidou A, Ludwig B, Pazera P. et al. Survival of palatal miniscrews used for orthodontic appliance anchorage: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Orthod Dentaofacial Orthop 2013; 143: 767-772
• 29 Rodriguez JC, Suarez F, Chan HL. et al. Implants for orthodontic anchorage: success rates and reasons of failures. Implant Dent 2014; 23: 155-161