Isovelocity vs. Isoinertial Sprint Cycling Tests for Power- and Torque-cadence Relationships

Mehdi Kordi; Jonathan Folland; Stuart Goodall; Paul Barratt; Glyn Howatson

doi:10.1055/a-0989-2387

International Journal of Sports Medicine, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Int J Sports Med 2019; 40(14): 897-902
DOI: 10.1055/a-0989-2387

Training & Testing

Isovelocity vs. Isoinertial Sprint Cycling Tests for Power- and Torque-cadence Relationships

Mehdi Kordi

¹Department of Sport Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

²British Cycling, GBCT, Manchester, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

,

Jonathan Folland

³School of sport & Exercise Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

,

Stuart Goodall

¹Department of Sport Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

,

Paul Barratt

²British Cycling, GBCT, Manchester, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

,

Glyn Howatson

¹Department of Sport Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

⁴Northwest University, Water Research Group, Potchefstroom, South Africa

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Sprint cycling performance is heavily dependent on mechanical peak power output (PPO) and the underlying power- and torque-cadence relationships. Other key indices of these relationships include maximum torque (T_MAX), cadence (C_MAX) and optimal cadence (C_OPT). Two common methods are used in the laboratory to ascertain PPO: isovelocity and isoinertial. Little research has been carried out to compare the magnitude and reliability of these performance measures with these two common sprint cycling assessments. The aim of this study was to compare the magnitude and reliability of PPO, T_MAX, C_MAX and C_OPT measured with isovelocity and isoinertial sprint cycling methods. Two experimental sessions required 20 trained cyclists to perform isoinertial sprints and then isovelocity sprints. For each method, power-cadence and torque-cadence relationships were established, and PPO and C_OPT were interpolated and T_MAX and C_MAX were extrapolated. The isoinertial method produced significantly higher PPO (p<0.001) and T_MAX (p<0.001) than the isovelocity method. However, the isovelocity method produced significantly higher C_OPT (p<0.001) and C_MAX (p=0.002). Both sprint cycling tests showed high levels of between-session reliability (isoinertial 2.9–4.4%; isovelocity 2.7–4.0%). Functional measures of isovelocity and isoinertial sprint cycling tests were highly reliable but should not be used interchangably.

Key words

maximum power - pedaling - torque - cadence

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Gardner AS, Martin JC, Martin DT, Barras M, Jenkins DG. Maximal torque- and power-pedaling rate relationships for elite sprint cyclists in laboratory and field tests. Eur J Appl Physiol 2007; 101: 287-292
2 Martin JC, Wagner BM, Coyle EF. Inertial-load method determines maximal cycling power in a single exercise bout. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29: 1505-1512
3 Seck D, Vandewalle H, Decrops N, Monod H. Maximal power and torque-velocity relationship on a cycle ergometer during the acceleration phase of a single all-out exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1995; 70: 161-168
4 Bundle MW, Weyand PG. Sprint exercise performance: Does metabolic power matter?. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2012; 40: 174-182
5 Grassi B, Cerretelli P, Narici MV, Marconi C. Peak anaerobic power in master athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1991; 62: 394-399
6 Weyand PG, Lin JE, Bundle MW. Sprint performance-duration relationships are set by the fractional duration of external force application. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2006; 290: R758-R765
7 Ferretti G, Narici MV, Binzoni T, Gariod L, Le Bas JF, Reutenauer H, Cerretelli P. Determinants of peak muscle power: effects of age and physical conditioning. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1994; 68: 111-115
8 Ingham SA, Whyte GP, Jones K, Nevill AM. Determinants of 2 000 m rowing ergometer performance in elite rowers. Eur J Appl Physiol 2002; 88: 243-246
9 Dorel S, Hautier CA, Rambaud O, Rouffet D, Van Praagh E, Lacour J-R, Bourdin M. Torque and power-velocity relationships in cycling: relevance to track sprint performance in world-class cyclists. Int J Sports Med 2005; 26: 739-746
10 Arsac LM, Belli A, Lacour JR. Muscle function during brief maximal exercise: accurate measurements on a friction-loaded cycle ergometer. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1996; 74: 100-106
11 Driss T, Vandewalle H, Le Chevalier J-M, Monod H. Force-velocity relationship on a cycle ergometer and knee-extensor strength indices. Can J Appl Physiol 2002; 27: 250-262
12 Dorel S, Guilhem G, Couturier A, Hug F. Adjustment of muscle coordination during an all-out sprint cycling task. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: 2154-2164
13 Katch V, Weltman A, Martin R, Gray L. Optimal test characteristics for maximal anaerobic work on the bicycle ergometer. Res Q 1977; 48: 319-327
14 Martin JC, Davidson CJ, Pardyjak ER. Understanding sprint-cycling performance: the integration of muscle power, resistance, and modeling. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2007; 2: 5-21
15 McDaniel J, Behjani NS, Elmer SJ, Brown NA, Martin JC. Joint-specific power-pedaling rate relationships during maximal cycling. J Appl Biomech 2014; 30: 423-430
16 Sargeant AJ, Hoinville E, Young A. Maximum leg force and power output during short-term dynamic exercise. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 1981; 51: 1175-1182
17 Driss T, Vandewalle H. The measurement of maximal (anaerobic) power output on a cycle ergometer: A critical review. BioMed Res Int 2013; 2013: 589361
18 Martin JC, Diedrich D, Coyle EF. Time course of learning to produce maximum cycling power. Int J Sports Med 2000; 21: 485-487
19 Mendez-Villanueva A, Bishop D, Hamer P. Reproducibility of a 6-s maximal cycling sprint test. J Sci Med Sport 2007; 10: 323-326
20 Baron R, Bachl N, Petschnig R, Tschan H, Smekal G, Pokan R. Measurement of maximal power output in isokinetic and non-isokinetic cycling. A comparison of two methods. Int J Sports Med 1999; 20: 532-537
21 Jaafar H, Attiogbé E, Rouis M, Vandewalle H, Driss T. Reliability of force-velocity tests in cycling and cranking exercises in men and women. BioMed Res Int 2015; 2015: 1-12
22 Harriss DJ, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Standards for ethics in sport and exercise science research: 2018 update. Int J Sports Med 2017; 38: 1126-1131
23 Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 3-13
24 Buchheit M, Lefebvre B, Laursen PB, Ahmaidi S. Reliability, usefulness, and validity of the 30-15 intermittent ice test in young elite ice hockey players. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 1457-1464
25 Beelen A, Sargeant AJ. Effect of fatigue on maximal power output at different contraction velocities in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1991; 71: 2332-2337
26 Tomas A, Ross EZ, Martin JC. Fatigue during maximal sprint cycling: unique role of cumulative contraction cycles. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010; 42: 1364-1369
27 Seck D, Vandewalle H, Decrops N, Monod H. Maximal power and torque-velocity relationship on a cycle ergometer during the acceleration phase of a single all-out exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1995; 70: 161-168