Fixierung von Hauttransplantaten mit Vakuumversiegelung: Eine sinnvolle Option?

Zusammenfassung

Die Vakuumversiegelung (VS) ist eine seit circa 20 Jahren in der klassischen Wundversorgung nicht mehr wegzudenkende Therapieoption. Insbesondere im Bereich der Wundgrundkonditionierung von chronischen Wunden nimmt sie einen wichtigen Stellenwert ein. In den letzten Jahren wird die Vakuumversiegelung auch zur Fixierung und dem postoperativen Wundmanagement nach Hauttransplantation immer häufiger eingesetzt. Die vorliegende Übersichtsarbeit beschäftigt sich mit den Daten und Evidenzen eines solche Vorgehens und zeigt Möglichkeiten der Nutzung auf.

Schlüsselwörter

Vakuumversiegelung - Spalthauttransplantat - chronische Wunde - randomisierte kontrolliert Studie

• Literatur / References

• 1 Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ. Vacuum-assisted closure: A new method for wound control and treatment: Clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38: 563-577
• 2 Blume PA, Key JJ, Thakor P. et al. Retrospective evaluation of clinical outcomes in subjects with split-thickness skin graft: Comparing V. A. C.® therapy and conventional therapy in foot and ankle reconstructive surgeries. Int Wound J 2010; 7: 480-487
• 3 Carson SN, Overall K, Lee-Jahshan S. et al. Vacuum-assisted closure used for healing chronic wounds and skin grafts in the lower extremities. Ostomy Wound Manage 2004; 50: 52-58
• 4 Chen D, Zhao Y, Li Z. et al. Circulating fibrocyte mobilization in negative pressure wound therapy. J Cell Mol Med 2017; 21: 1513-1522
• 5 Chin MS, Ogawa R, Lancerotto L. et al. In vivo acceleration of skin growth using a servo-controlled stretching device. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2010; 16: 397-405
• 6 Dainty LA, Bosco JJ, McBroom JW. et al. Novel techniques to improve split-thickness skin graft viability during vulvo-vaginal reconstruction. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 97: 949-952
• 7 Guoqi W, Zhirui L, Song W. et al. Negative pressure wound therapy reduces the motility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enhances wound healing in a rabbit ear biofilm infection model. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2018; 111: 1557-1570
• 8 Hsiao SF-Y, Ma H, Wang Y-H. et al. Occlusive drainage system for split-thickness skin graft: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Burns 2017; 43: 379-387
• 9 Hsu C-C, Chow S-E, Chen CP-C. et al. Negative pressure accelerated monolayer keratinocyte healing involves Cdc42 mediated cell podia formation. J Dermatol Sci 2013; 70: 196-203
• 10 Kairinos N, Solomons M, Hudson DA. The paradox of negative pressure wound therapy – in vitro studies. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63: 174-179
• 11 Ker H, Al-Murrani A, Rolfe G. et al. WOUND Study: A Cost-Utility Analysis of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Split-Skin Grafting for Lower Limb Skin Cancer. J Surg Res 2019; 235: 308-314
• 12 Kim EK, Hong JP. Efficacy of negative pressure therapy to enhance take of 1-stage allodermis and a split-thickness graft. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 58: 536-540
• 13 Korber A, Franckson T, Grabbe S. et al. Vacuum assisted closure device improves the take of mesh grafts in chronic leg ulcer patients. Dermatology 2008; 216: 250-256
• 14 Li T, Wang G, Yin P. et al. Effect of negative pressure on growth, secretion and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 108: 907-917
• 15 Llanos S, Danilla S, Barraza C. et al. Effectiveness of negative pressure closure in the integration of split thickness skin grafts: a randomized, double-masked, controlled trial. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 700-705
• 16 Lu F, Ogawa R, Nguyen DT. et al. Microdeformation of three-dimensional cultured fibroblasts induces gene expression and morphological changes. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 66: 296-300
• 17 Messerschmidt A, Meissner M, Kaufmann R. et al. Local treatment of chronic wounds. Phlebologie 2016; 45 (02) 106-112
• 18 Moisidis E, Heath T, Boorer C. et al. A prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial of topical negative pressure use in skin grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 917-922
• 19 Morykwas MJ, Simpson J, Punger K. et al. Vacuum-assisted closure: State of basic research and physiologic foundation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (07) Suppl 121S-126S
• 20 Petkar KS, Dhanraj P, Kingsly PM. et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing negative pressure dressing and conventional dressing methods on split-thickness skin grafts in burned patients. Burns 2011; 37: 925-929
• 21 Scherer LA, Shiver S, Chang M. et al. The vacuum assisted closure device: a method of securing skin grafts and improving graft survival. Arch Surg 2002; 137 (08) 930-933
• 22 Schneider AM, Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC. A new and reliable method of securing skin grafts to the difficult recipient bed. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 1195-1198
• 23 Valesky EM, Kaufmann R, Meissner M. Special indications for negative pressure wound therapy in dermatologic surgery. Hautarzt 2013; 64 (08) 585-591
• 24 Wackenfors A, Sjogren J, Gustafsson R. et al. Effects of vacuum-assisted closure therapy on inguinal wound edge microvascular blood flow. Wound Repair Regen 2004; 12: 600-606
• 25 Weinfeld AB, Kelley P, Yuksel E. et al. Circumferential negative-pressure dressing (VAC) to bolster skin grafts in the reconstruction of the penile shaft and scrotum. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54: 178-183
• 26 Yin Y, Zhang R, Li S. et al. Negative-pressure therapy versus conventional therapy on split-thickness skin graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2018; 50: 43-48