CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2019; 07(08): E1002-E1007
DOI: 10.1055/a-0957-2866
Original article
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019

Utilizing fourth-generation endocytoscopy and the ‘enlarged nuclear sign’ for in vivo diagnosis of early gastric cancer

Mary Raina Angeli Abad
Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Haruhiro Inoue
Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Haruo Ikeda
Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Anastassios Manolakis
Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Enrique Rodriguez de Santiago
Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Ashish Sharma
Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Yusuke Fujiyoshi
Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Hisashi Fukuda
Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Kazuya Sumi
Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Manabu Onimaru
Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Yuto Shimamura
Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 28 January 2019

accepted after revision 02 May 2019

Publication Date:
08 August 2019 (online)

Abstract

Background and study aims Fourth-generation endocytoscopy is an ultra-high magnification endoscopic technique designed to provide excellent quality in vivo histologic assessment of gastrointestinal lesions. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of endocytoscopy in early gastric cancer diagnosis.

Patients and methods A single-center, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from all gastric endocytoscopic examinations was conducted. Two expert endoscopists, blinded to white-light and narrow-band imaging findings as well as histopathologic diagnosis, independently reviewed and diagnosed all endocytoscopic images. A newly recognized “enlarged nuclear sign” was detected, and its implication in early gastric cancer diagnosis was evaluated. The diagnostic performance of fourth-generation endocytoscopy was assessed while using the gold standard histopathology as a reference.

Results Forty-three patients (mean age±SD, 72.6 ± 12.1 years; 31 males) were enrolled. Based on histopathology, 23 had well-differentiated adenocarcinomas, four adenomas, and 16 non-neoplastic lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of fourth-generation endocytoscopy for gastric cancer diagnosis were 87.0 % (95 % CI: 67.9 – 95.5), 80.0 % (95 % CI: 58.4 – 91.9), and 83.7 % (95 % CI: 70.0 – 91.9) by endoscopist A; and 91.3 % (95 % CI: 73.2 – 97.6), 75.0 % (95 % CI: 53.1 – 88.8), and 83.7 % (95 % CI: 70.0 – 91.9) by endoscopist B. The inter-observer agreement, Kappa statistic = 0.71 (95 % CI: 0.50 – 0.93), was good. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the enlarged nuclear sign for early gastric cancer diagnosis were 87.0 % (95 % CI: 67.9 – 95.5), 95.0 % (95 % CI: 76.4 – 99.1), and 90.7 % (95 % CI: 78.4 – 96.3) by endoscopist A; and 82.6 % (95 % CI: 62.9 – 93.0), 85.0 % (95 % CI: 64.0 – 94.8), and 83.7 % (95 % CI: 70.0 – 91.9) by endoscopist B. The inter-observer agreement, Kappa statistic = 0.68 (95 % CI: 0.51 – 0.89) was good.

Conclusion: Fourth-generation endocytoscopy appears to aid in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer, particularly well-differentiated adenocarcinomas, due to its good diagnostic accuracy and identification of the “enlarged nuclear sign,” and deserves further evaluation in future studies.

 
  • References

  • 1 Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Ca Cancer J Clin 2018; 0: 1-31
  • 2 Tsurodome I, Miyahara R, Funasaka K. et al. In vivo histological diagnosis for gastric cancer using endocytoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23: 6894-6901
  • 3 Kaise M, Ohkura Y, Iizuka T. et al. Endocytoscopy is a promising modality with high diagnostic accuracy for gastric cancer. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 19-25
  • 4 Kumagai Y, Kawada K, Takubo K. et al. Ultra-high magnification endoscopy (endocytoscopy system) for examination of esophageal lesions. Gastroenterol Endosc 2017; 59: 209-218
  • 5 Kumagai Y, Takubo K, Kawada K. et al. A newly developed continuous zoom-focus endocytoscope. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 176-180
  • 6 Kaise M, Kimura R, Nomura K. et al. Accuracy and concordance of endocytoscopic atypia for the diagnosis of gastric cancer. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 827-832
  • 7 Kudo SE, Wakamura K, Ikehara N. et al. Diagnosis of colorectal lesions with a novel endocytoscopic classification – a pilot study. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 869-875
  • 8 Inoue H, Yokoyama A, Kudo SE. Ultrahigh magnifying endoscopy: development of CM double staining for endocytoscopy and its safety. Nihon Rinsho 2010; 68: 1247-1252
  • 9 Ichimasa K, Kudo SE, Mori Y. et al. Double staining with crystal violet and methylene blue is appropriate for colonic endocytoscopy: an in vivo prospective pilot study. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 403-408
  • 10 Minami H, Inoue H, Yokoyama A. et al. Recent advancement of observing living cells in the esophagus using CM double staining: endocytoscopic atypia classification. Dis Esophagus 2012; 25: 235-241
  • 11 Inoue H, Kudo SE, Shiokawa A. Novel endoscopic imaging techniques toward in vivo observation of living cancer cells in the gastrointestinal tract. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3: S61-S63
  • 12 Inoue H, Kazawa T, Sato Y. et al. In vivo observation of living cancer cells in the esophagus, stomach, and colon using catheter-type contact endoscope, “endo-cytoscopy system”. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2004; 14: 589-594
  • 13 Sato H, Inoue H, Hayee B. et al. In vivo histopathology using endocytoscopy for non-neoplastic changes in the gastric mucosa: a prospective pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 875-881