Evaluation of a novel low-cost disposable endoscope for visual assessment of the esophagus and stomach in an ex-vivo phantom model

Abstract

Background and study aims Our academic lab has developed a novel, low-cost, disposable endoscope for assessment of the esophagus and stomach without need for large equipment or complex electronics. Usability and intuitiveness of the platform are unknown.

Methods The novel endoscope (NE) consists of a high-definition camera, LED module, and three bellows. Compressed air actuates the bellows, producing camera/LED articulation. Insufflation and lens cleaning ports are present. Video can be displayed on any monitor. Total material costs less than $ 35 US. Five novices, five fellows, and five attendings performed five trials using a conventional endoscope and the NE on an upper tract phantom with six gastric landmarks marked. Outcomes included successful identification and time to landmarks; and intuitiveness (NASA task load index; user comments).

Results All landmarks were successfully identified with both endoscopes for all trials (n = 900). Attendings and fellows were quicker with the conventional endoscope when compared to the NE (24.48 v 37.13s; P < 0.01). There was no significant time difference between platforms for novices (P = 0.16). All users found the NE intuitive with low mental and physical demand. Novices reported lower temporal demand and effort when using the NE.

Conclusions The NE was easy to maneuver, intuitive, and successful at visualizing gastric landmarks. All users were pleased with the NE drive mechanism and were successful at visualizing the gastric landmarks in a clinically acceptable time. The novel platform has the potential to facilitate rapid, low-cost, diagnostic assessment of the esophagus and stomach in non-traditional settings – facilitating patient management decisions, minimizing encumbrance, and avoiding cross-contamination.

• References

• 1 Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J. et al. Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology 2012; 5: 1179-187
• 2 Ben-Menachem T, Decker G, Early DS. et al. Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 707-718
• 3 Ofstead CL, Quick MR, Eiland JE. et al. A glimpse at the true cost of reprocessing endoscopes. International Association of Healthcare Central Service Materiel Management. 2017 Available from https://www.bostonscientific.com/content/dam/bostonscientific/uro-wh/portfolio-group/LithoVue/pdfs/Sterilization-Resource-Handout.pdf Accessed 2019 March 5
• 4 Faigel DO, Baron TH, Lewis B. et al. Ensuring competence in endoscopy. Prepared by the ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy. 2007 Available from: https://www.asge.org/docs/default-source/education/practice_guidelines/doc competence.pdf?sfvrsn=6 Accessed 2019 March 5
• 5 Garbin N, Sarker S, Sohn DC. et al. Evaluation of a novel disposable upper endoscope for unsedated bedside (non-endoscopy unit based) assessment of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: AB304
• 6 Burgner-Kahrs J, Rucker DC, Choset H. Continuum robots for medical applications: a survey. IEEE Trans Robot 2015; 31: 1261-1280
• 7 Simaan N. Snake-like units using flexible backbones and actuation redundancy for enhanced miniaturization. IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 2005; 3012-3017
• 8 Bailly Y, Amirat Y. Modeling and control of a hybrid continuum active catheter for aortic aneurysm treatment. IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 2005; 924-929
• 9 Gagarina T, Joli P. Modeling and experimental analysis of a new bellow type actuators for active catheter end-effector. ROMAN 2001; 612-617
• 10 Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances Psychol 1988; 52: 139-183
• 11 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R. et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42: 377-381
• 12 Abbas N, Makker J, Abbas H. et al. Perioperative care of patient with liver cirrhosis: a review. Health Serv Insights 2017; 10