Die Nadeln im Heuhaufen finden: Qualitätskriterien für den Einsatz von internetbasierten Selbstmanagement-Interventionen in Prävention und Behandlung psychischer Störungen

Zusammenfassung

Zahlreiche Selbstmanagement Interventionen haben in randomisierten Studien ihre Wirksamkeit in der Behandlung von einer Reihe von psychischen Störungen gezeigt. Dennoch sind diese Interventionen gegenwärtig noch nicht überall in der klinischen Routine angekommen. Das liegt unter anderem daran, dass neben den evidenzbasierten Interventionen auch Interventionen angeboten werden, die nie wissenschaftlich untersucht worden sind und teilweise noch nicht einmal auf evidenzbasierten Psychotherapiemethoden beruhen. Die vorliegenden Qualitätskriterien der beiden Fachgesellschaften DGPs und DGPPN sollen Betroffenen, Behandlern und Entscheidern im Gesundheitswesen helfen, sichere und wirksame Interventionen zu identifizieren. Im Mittelpunkt der Qualitätskriterien stehen die Sicherheit der Patienten und ihrer Daten; die Sicherstellung der therapeutischen Qualität durch Rückgriff auf evidenzbasierte Psychotherapiemethoden und Begleitung der Entwicklung durch approbierte Psychotherapeuten oder Fachärzte; das Vorliegen eines Wirksamkeitsnachweises aus mindestens einer randomisierten Studie; und die Transparenz bezüglich zentraler Informationen, z. B. der Kosten der Intervention. Wir hoffen, dass diese Kriterien dazu beitragen können, dass Selbstmanagement Interventionen in den Leistungskatalog der Krankenkassen aufgenommen werden.

Abstract

Numerous self-management interventions have proven to be efficacious in the treatment of a number of mental disorders in randomized trials. However, these interventions have not yet reached clinical routine everywhere. Among other things, this is due to the fact that, in addition to the evidence-based interventions, other interventions are offered that have never been scientifically investigated, and in some cases, do not even rely on evidence-based methods of psychotherapy. The present quality criteria, developed by the two professional associations DGPs and DGPPN, are intended to help patients, practitioners and decision-makers in the health care sector to identify safe and efficacious interventions. The core quality criteria cover the following aspects: safety of patients and their data; ensuring therapeutic quality by using evidence-based psychotherapeutic methods and developing the intervention in liaison with licensed psychotherapists or medical specialists; the presence of proof of efficacy from at least one randomized trial; and transparency regarding key information, e. g., the cost of the intervention. We hope that these criteria can contribute to the inclusion of self-management interventions in the range of services covered by statutory health insurance companies.

Schlüsselwörter

internetbasierte Interventionen - Qualitätskriterien - Prävention - Behandlung - psychische Störungen

Key words

Internet-based interventions - quality criteria - prevention - treatment - mental disorders

• Literatur

• 1 Olthuis JV, Watt MC, Bailey K, Hayden JA, Stewart SH. Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 3: CD011565 .
• 2 Riper H, Hoogendoorn A, Cuijpers P. et al. Effectiveness and treatment moderators of internet interventions for adult problem drinking: An individual patient data meta-analysis of 19 randomised controlled trials. PLoS Med 2018; 15: e1002714 .
• 3 Andrews G, Cuijpers P, Craske MG. et al. Computer therapy for the anxiety and depressive disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2010; 5: e13196 .
• 4 Kuester A, Niemeyer H, Knaevelsrud C. Internet-based interventions for posttraumatic stress: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Psychol Rev 2016; 43: 1-16 .
• 5 Karyotaki E, Riper H, Twisk J. et al. Efficacy of Self-guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms: A Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data. JAMA Psychiatry 2017; 74: 351-9 .
• 6 Karyotaki E, Ebert DD. Donkin et al. Do Guided Internet-Based Interventions Result in Clinically Relevant Changes for Patients with Depression? An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2018. .
• 7 Buntrock C, Ebert DD, Lehr D, Smit F, Riper H, Berking M, Cuijpers P. Effect of a Web-Based Guided Self-help Intervention for Prevention of Major Depression in Adults With Subthreshold Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2016; 315: 1854-63 .
• 8 Moritz S, Schroder J, Klein JP. et al. Effects of online intervention for depression on mood and positive symptoms in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.04.033.
• 9 Klein JP, Hauer A, Berger T. et al. Protocol for the REVISIT-BPD Trial, a Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Effectiveness of an Internet-Based Self-Management Intervention in the Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). Front Psychiatry 2018; 9: 439 .
• 10 Apolinario-Hagen J, Harrer M, Kahlke F. et al. Public Attitudes Toward Guided Internet-Based Therapies: Web-Based Survey Study. JMIR Ment Health 2018; 5: e10735 .
• 11 Zagorscak P, Heinrich M, Sommer D, Wagner B, Knaevelsrud C. Benefits of Individualized Feedback in Internet-Based Interventions for Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Psychother Psychosom 2018; 87: 32-45 .
• 12 Johansson R, Andersson G. Internet-based psychological treatments for depression. Expert Rev Neurother 2012; 12: 861-9 .
• 13 Nobis S, Ebert DD, Lehr D. et al. Web-based intervention for depressive symptoms in adults with types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus: a health economic evaluation. Br J Psychiatry 2018; 212: 199-206 .
• 14 Ebert DD, Nobis S, Lehr D. et al. The 6-month effectiveness of Internet-based guided self-help for depression in adults with Type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 2017; 34: 99-107 .
• 15 Nobis S, Lehr D, Ebert DD. et al. Efficacy of a web-based intervention with mobile phone support in treating depressive symptoms in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2015; 38: 776-83 .
• 16 Schröder J, Brückner K, Fischer A. et al. Efficacy of a psychological online intervention for depression in people with epilepsy: A randomized controlled trial. Epilepsia 2014; 55: 2069-76 .
• 17 Fischer A, Schröder J, Vettorazzi E. et al. An online programme to reduce depression in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2015; 2: 217-23 .
• 18 DGPPN, BÄK, KBV, AWMF, AkdA, BPtK, DAGSHG, DEGAM, DGPM, DGPs, DGRW (Hrsg). für die Leitliniengruppe Unipolare Depression. S3-Leitlinie / Nationale Versorgungsleitlinie Unipolare Depression - Langfassung. 2 ed.. Berlin, Düsseldorf: Available from: www.depression.versorgungsleitlinien.de [cited: 21.01.2016](2015).
• 19 Klein JP, Gerlinger G, Knaevelsrud C. et al. [Internet-based interventions in the treatment of mental disorders: Overview, quality criteria, perspectives]. Nervenarzt 2016; 87: 1185-93 .
• 20 Klein JP, Knaevelsrud C, Bohus M. et al [Internet-based self-management interventions: Quality criteria for their use in prevention and treatment of mental disorders]. Nervenarzt 2018; 89: 1277-86 .
• 21 Kidholm K, Ekeland AG, Jensen LK. et al. A model for assessment of telemedicine applications: mast. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2012; 28: 44-51 .
• 22 Ramsch-Gunther N, Stern S, Lauer W. Abgrenzung und Klassifizierung von Medical Apps. Was ist zu beachten und welche Unterstützung bietet das BfArM?. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2018; 61: 304-13 .
• 23 Albrecht UV, Pramann O. Haftungsfragen beim Einsatz von Gesundheits-Apps: Nobody is perfect. Dtsch Arztebl International 2018; 115: A520-A521 .
• 24 Chambless DL, Hollon SD. Defining empirically supported therapies. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998; 66: 7-18 .
• 25 Titov N, Andrews G, Davies M. et al. Internet treatment for depression: a randomized controlled trial comparing clinician vs. technician assistance. PLoS One 2010; 5: e10939 .