PDF herunterladen
physioscience 2019; 15(01): 17-27
DOI: 10.1055/a-0833-2160
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Validität und Intratester-Reliabilität der Fotometrie zur Beurteilung der Position des Schultergürtels gesunder Probanden[1]

Validity and Intratester Reliability of Photometry to Evaluate the Shoulder Girdle Posture in Healthy Subjects
Camilla Kapitza
  Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaft und Kunst (HAWK), Hildesheim
,
Anke Hoch
  Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaft und Kunst (HAWK), Hildesheim
,
Thomas Schöttker-Königer
  Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaft und Kunst (HAWK), Hildesheim
,
Axel Schäfer
  Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaft und Kunst (HAWK), Hildesheim
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

10. Januar 2018

21. August 2018

Publikationsdatum:
04. Februar 2019 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Da die Körperhaltung möglicherweise ein relevanter, beitragender als auch prognostischer Faktor bei muskuloskeletalen Problemen ist, stellt deren Beurteilung einen wichtigen Bestandteil der physiotherapeutischen Untersuchung dar. Das klinimetrische Verfahren der digitalen Fotometrie kann Parameter der Haltung objektiv erheben.

Ziel Die Studie untersuchte die Validität und die Intratester-Reliabilität eines Fotometrie-Programms zur Beurteilung der Güte seiner Anwendung in der Praxis und Forschung.

Methode In der Messgruppe wurde die Haltung des Schultergürtels von 48 Probanden im Alter von 19 bis 46 Jahren zu 2 Messzeitpunkten in 4 Ebenen gemessen, um folgende Variablen zu bestimmen: Skapula-Rotation, Pro- und Retraktion, Skapula-Kippung, kraniovertebraler Winkel, thorakale Kyphose und Schulterschiefstand. Die Intratester-Reliabilität wurde in einem Abstand von 3 Wochen untersucht. Die Bestimmung der Kriteriumsvalidität erfolgte über die Korrelation der Messwerte der Fotometrie mit denen eines digitalen Inklinometers, eines CROM und eines Zentimetermaßes.

Ergebnisse Validität: Die Korrelationskoeffizienten der gemessenen Winkel lagen zwischen r = 0,63, 95 %-Konfidenzintervall (KI) und r = 0,95, 95 %KI (p > 0,001), die Zentimetermessungen zwischen r = 0,57 und r = 0,96, 95 %KI (p < 0,0001). Intratester-Reliabilität: Die Intraklassenkorrelationskoeffizienten (ICC) der Winkelmessungen erreichten zwischen 0,77 und 0,96 CI und die ICC der Zentimetermessung zwischen 0,62 und 0,93 KI. Der Standardfehler der Messungen (SEM) betrug je nach Winkel zwischen 0,64° und 3,46° bzw. Abstand zwischen 0,35 cm und 0,98 cm.

Schlussfolgerung Die Ergebnisse lassen darauf schließen, dass die Fotometrie für die Winkel Skapula-Rotation, Skapula-Kippung und Akromioklavikulargelenk sowie für die Abstände zwischen Trigonum scapulae zur Wirbelsäule und Angulus inferior zur Wirbelsäule als valides und reliables Messinstrument zur Beurteilung des Schultergürtels bei gesunden Probanden verwendet werden kann. Insbesondere die Winkelmessungen zeigten gute Resultate.

Abstract

Background Body posture may be a relevant, contributing as well as prognostic factor in musculoskeletal problems. Therefore, its assessment is considered to be an important part of physiotherapeutic examination. Digital photometry is a clinical measuring method for objective collection of posture parameters.

Objective This study investigated the validity and intratester reliability of photometry in order to assess its qualitative application in clinical practice and research.

Method Shoulder girdle posture was measured in 19 to 46 years old 48 subjects at 2 measurement points in four levels in order to determine the following variables: scapula rotation, protraction and retraction, scapula tilt, cranio-vertebral angle, thoracic kyphosis and shoulder obliquity. Intratester reliability was examined at intervals of three weeks. The criterion validity was determined by correlating the measured photometry values with those of a digital inclinometer, CROM and centimetre tape.

Results Validity: Correlation coefficients of the measured angles were between r = 0.65 and r = 0.95, 95 % confidence interval (CI), centimetre measures were between r = 0.57 and r = 0.96, 95 % CI (p < 0.0001). Intratester Reliability: Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) of the measured angles were between 0.77 and and 0.96 CI an d the ICC of the centimetre measures are between 0.62 and 0.93 CI. Standard error of measurement (SEM) varied between 0.64° and 3.46° and distance measurement between 0.35 cm and 0.98 cm.

Conclusions The results of this study imply that photometry is a valid and reliable assessment tool for shoulder girdle evaluation in healthy subjects for the angles of scapula rotation, scapula tilt and acromioclavicular joint as well as for the distances between trigonum scapulae to vertebral column and inferior angle to vertebral column. Predominantly angle measurements showed good results.

Schlüsselwörter

Schultergürtel - Haltung - Reliabilität - Validität - Fotometrie

Key words

shoulder girdle - posture - reliability - validity - photometry

1 Master-Arbeit der Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaft und Kunst (HAWK), Hildesheim.


 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Aggarwal P, Aggarwal B, Jain D. Clinical approach to neck pain. Indian J Rheumatol 2010; 5: 193-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Cohen SP. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2015; 90: 284-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Vos T. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380: 2163-2196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Walton DM, Carroll LJ, Kasch H. et al. An Overview of Systematic Reviews on Prognostic Factors in Neck Pain. Results from the International Collaboration on Neck Pain (ICON) Project. Open Orthop J 2013; 7: 494-505
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Carroll L. et al. The burden and determinants of neck pain in the general population. Results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine 2008; 33 (Suppl. 04) S39-S51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Casser HR, Hasenbring M, Becker A. et al. Rückenschmerzen und Nackenschmerzen. Interdisziplinäre Diagnostik und Therapie, Versorgungspfade, Patientenedukation, Begutachtung, Langzeitbetreuung. Berlin: Springer; 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Webb R, Brammah T, Lunt M. et al. Prevalence and predictors of intense, chronic, and disabling neck and back pain in UK general population. Spine 2003; 38: 1195-1202
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Greving K, Dorrestijn O, Winters JC. et al. Incidence, prevalence, and consultation rates of shoulder complaints in general practice. Scand J Rheumatol 2012; 41: 150-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bullock MP, Foster NE, Wright CC. Shoulder impingement: the effect of sitting posture on shoulder pain and range of motion. Man Ther 2005; 10: 28-37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lewis JS. Rotator cuff tendinopathy/subacromial impingement syndrome: is it time for a new method of assessment?. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43: 259-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kibler WB, Ludewig PM. Scapular Summit 2009: Introduction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009; 39: 1-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wegner S, Jull G, O’Leary S. et al. The effect of scapular correction strategy on trapezius activity in patients with neck pain. Man Ther 2010; 15: 562-566
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ha SM, Kwon OY, Yi CH. et al. Effects of passive correction of scapular position on pain, proprioception, and range of motion in neck-pain patients with bilateral scapular downward-rotation syndrome. Man Ther 2011; 16: 585-589
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kibler BW, McMullen J. Scapular dyskinesis and its relation to shoulder pain. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2003; 11: 142-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Karduna AR, Kerner P, Lazarus M. Effects of scapular orientation on subacrominal contact forces. Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the International Shoulder Group. Cleveland: 2002
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Seitz AL, McClure PW, Finucane S. et al. Mechanisms of rotator cuff tendinopathy: intrinsic, extrinsic, or both?. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2011; 26: 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ratcliffe E, Pickering S, McLean S. et al. Is there a relationship between subacromial impingement syndrome and scapular orientation? A systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2013; 48: 1396-1396
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 O’Sullivan P. Diagnosis und classification of chronic low back pain disorders: Maladaptive movement and motor control impairments as underlying mechanism. Man Ther 2005; 10: 242-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB. et al. Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide (Practical Guides to Biostatistics and Epidemiology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Nijs J, Roussel N, Struyf F. et al. Clinical assessment of scapular positioning in patients with shoulder pain: state of the art. J Manipul Physiol Ther 2007; 30: 69-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Karduna AR, McClure PW, Michener LA. et al. Dynamic Measurements of Three-Dimensional Scapular Kinematics: A Validation Study. J Biomech Eng 2001; 123: 184-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 McClure PW, Michener LA, Sennett BJ. et al. Direct 3-dimensional measurement of scapular kinematics during dynamic movements in vivo. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10: 269-277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hickey BW, Milosavljevic S, Bell MJ. et al. Accuracy and reliability of observational motion analysis in identifying shoulder symptoms. Man Ther 2007; 12: 263-270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 May S, Littlewood C, Bishop A. Reliability of procedures used in the physical examination of non-specific low back pain: A systematic review. Austr J Physiother 2006; 52: 91-102
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Perry M, Smith A, Straker L. et al. Reliability of sagittal photographic spinal posture assessment in adolescents. Advances Physiother 2008; 10: 66-75
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Van Niekerk SM, Louw Q, Vaughan C. et al. Photographic measurement of upper-body sitting posture of high school students: a reliability and validity study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 9: 113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Peterson DE, Blankenship KR, Robb JB. et al. Investigation of the validity and reliability of four objective techniques for measuring forward shoulder posture. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1997; 25: 34-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 DiVeta J, Walker ML, Skibinski B. Relationship between performance of selected scapular muscles and scapular abduction in standing subjects. Phys Ther 1990; 70: 470-476
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Gibson MH, Goebel GV, Jordan TM. et al. A reliability study of measurement techniques to determine static scapular position. J Orthop Sports Physi Ther 1995; 21: 100-106
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Odom CJ, Taylor AB, Hurd CE. et al. Measurement of Scapular Asymmetry and Assessment of Shoulder Dysfunction Using the Lateral Scapular Slide Test. A Reliability and Validity Study. J Am Phys Ther Assoc 2001; 81: 799-809
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Johnson MP, McClure PW, Karduna R. New method to assess scapular upward rotation in subjects with shoulder pathology. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2001; 31: 81-89
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Dunleavy K, Neil J, Tallon A. et al. Reliability and validity of cervical position measurements in individuals with and without chronic neck pain. J Manipulative Ther 2014; 23: 188-196
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Akel I, Pekmezci M, Hayran M. et al. Evaluation of shoulder balance in the normal adolescent population and its correlation with radiological parameters. Eur Spine J 2008; 17: 348-354
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Lau KT, Cheung KY, Chan KB. et al. Relationships between sagittal postures of thoracic and cervical spine, presence of neck pain, neck pain severity and disability. Man Ther 2010; 15: 457-462
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Wu G, van der Helm FCT, Veeger HEJ. et al. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion. Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech 2005; 38: 981-992
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Zonnenberg AJJ, van Maanen CJ, Elvers JWH. et al. Intra/Interrater Reliability of Measurements on Body Posture Photographs. Cranio 1996; 14: 326-331
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Dialekt-Projekt-Team. Statistik interaktiv! Deskriptive Statistik. Berlin: Springer; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Hanneman S. Design, Analysis, and Interpretation of Method-Comparison Studies. AACN Adv Crit Care 2008; 19: 223-234
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Bland M. An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Dunk NM, Lalonde J, Callaghan JP. Implications for the use of postural analysis as clinical diagnostic tool: Reliability of quantifying upright standing spinal postures from photographic images. J Manipulative Physiolog Ther 2005; 28: 386-392
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Sampat MP, Whitman GJ, Stephens TW. et al. The reliability of measuring physical characteristics of spiculated masses on mammography. Br J Radiol 2006; 79: 134-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Borsa PA, Timmons MK, Sauers EL. Scapular-Positioning Patterns during Humeral Elevation in Unimpaired Shoulders. J Athl Train 2003; 38: 12-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Watson L, Balster SM, Finch C. et al. Measurement of scapula upward rotation: a reliable clinical procedure. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 599-603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Nijs J, Roussel N, Vermeulen K. et al. Scapular positioning in patients with shoulder pain: A study examinimg the reliability and clinical importance of 3 clinical tests. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2005; 86: 1349-1355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Struyf F, Nijs J, De Coninck K. et al. Clinical assessment of scapular positioning in musicians: an intertester reliability study. J Athl Train 2009; 44: 519-526
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Hochschild J. Strukturen und Funktionen begreifen. Funktionelle Anatomie-Therapierelevante Details. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Schünke M, Schulte E, Schumacher U. Lernatlas der Anatomie. Allgemeine Anatomie und Bewegungssystem. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Kibler WB. Management of the Scapula in Glenohumeral Instability. Techniques in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery 2003; 4: 89-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Cuadrado ML, Pareja JA. Myofascial trigger points, neck mobility, and forward head posture in episodic tension type headache. Headache 2007; 47: 662-672
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Raine S, Twomey LT. Head and Shoulder Posture Variations Women and Men. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 1215-1223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Borstad JD. Resting Position Variables at the Shoulder: Evidence to Support a posture-impairment association. Phys Ther 2006; 86: 549-557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Bortz J, Döring N. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation (für Human und Sozialwissenschaftler). Berlin: Springer; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Griegel-Morris P, Larson K, Mueller-Klaus K. et al. Incidence of common postural abnormalities in the cervical, shoulder, and thoracic regions and their association with pain in two age groups of healthy subjects. Phys Ther 1992; 72: 425-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Hoy DG, Protani M, De R. et al. The epidemiology of neck pain. Best practice & research. Clin Rheumatol 2010; 24: 783-792
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Kendall FP, Kendall Mc Creary E, Provance PG. et al. Muskeln, Funktionen und Tests. München: Urban & Fischer; 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 56 Kolber MJ, Hanney WJ. The reliability and concurrent validity of shoulder mobility measurements using a digital inclinometer and Goniometer: A technical Report. Intern J Sports Phys Ther 2012; 7: 306
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Ludwig O, Schmitt E. Neurokybernetik der Körperhaltung. Haltung & Bewegung 2006; 1: 5-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Oyama S, Myers JB, Wassinger C. et al. Asymmetric resting scapular posture in healthy overhead athletes. J Athl Train 2008; 43: 565-570
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Scibek JS, Carcia CR. Validation of a new method for assessing scapular anterior-posterior tilt. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2014; 9: 644
    PubMedGoogle Scholar