Perspektien digitaler Diabetesprävention: wo wollen wir hin?

ZUSAMMENFASSUNG

Es ist ein steigendes praktisches und wissenschaftliches Interesse an digitalen Gesundheitsanwendungen wie telemedizinischen Ansätzen zur Steigerung des Diabetesselbstmanagements (DSM) bei Diabetes mellitus Typ 2 zu beobachten. Neben der klinischen Wirksamkeit und Kosteneffektivität von Telemedizin sollten jedoch auch Faktoren, die die Akzeptanz von Telemedizinanwendungen beeinflussen, beachtet werden. Wissenschaftliche Studien legen dabei nahe, dass digitale Ansätze zur Verbesserung des Diabetesselbstmanagement auf behavioristischen Theorien basieren sollten. Eine langfristige Implementierung kann durch die Analyse akzeptanzfördernder Faktoren, wie individuellen Charakteristika des Endnutzers und dessen Einstellungen zu Eigenschaften der technischen Lösungen, unterstützt werden. Methodische Herausforderungen bei der Evaluation von telemedizinischen Anwendungen und deren heterogene Evaluationspraxis haben bisher zu einer limitierten Datenbasis geführt. Innovative Studiendesigns und konzertierte Evaluationsansätze können die steigende Verfügbarkeit digitaler Gesundheitsanwendungen durch evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen begleiten.

• Literatur

• 1 Miller EA. Solving the disjuncture between research and practice.. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2007; 82: 133-141 doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.09.011
• 2 Otto L. et al. Towards a unified understanding of eHealth and related terms – proposal of a consolidated terminological basis. In: Health Informatics Europe 2018 Madeira: HEALTHINF;
• 3 Bellazzi R, Arcelloni M, Ferrari P. et al Management of patients with diabetes through information technology.. Diabetes Technol Ther 2004; 6: 567-578 doi:10.1089/dia.2004.6.567
• 4 Izquierdo RE, Wang D, Huang D. et al Case management with a diabetes team using home telemedicine: acceptance of treatment recommendations by primary care providers in IDEATel.. Telemed J E Health 2015; 21: 980-986 doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0236
• 5 Trief PM, Sandberg J, Izguierdo R. et al Diabetes management assisted by telemedicine: patient perspectives.. Telemed J E Health 2008; 14: 647-655 doi: 10.1089/tmj.2007.0107
• 6 Tchero H, Kangambega P, Briatte C. et al. Clinical effectiveness of telemedicine in diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of 42 randomized controlled trials. Telemed J E Health 2018 Aug 20 doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0128
• 7 Huang F, Blaschke S, Lucas H. Beyond pilotitis: taking digital health interventions to the national level in China and Uganda.. Global Health 2017; 13: 49 doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0275-z
• 8 Kuipers P, Humphreys JS, Wakeman J. et al Collaborative review of pilot projects to inform policy: a methodological remedy for pilotitis?. Aust New Zealand Health Policy 2008; 5: 17 doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-5-17
• 9 Schwarz PEH, Timpel P, Harst L. et al Blood sugar regulation for cardiovascular health promotion and disease prevention.. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 72: 1829-1844 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.081
• 10 Messina J, Campbell S, Morris R. et al A narrative systematic review of factors affecting diabetes prevention in primary care settings.. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0177699 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177699
• 11 Manz K, Schlack R, Poethko-Müller C. et al Körperlich-sportliche Aktivität und Nutzung elektronischer Medien im Kindes- und Jugendalter – Ergebnisse der KiGGS-Studie – Erste Folgefefragung (KiGGS Welle 1).. Bundesgesundheitsbl 2014; 57: 840 doi: 10.1007/s00103-014-1986-4
• 12 Vorwerg Y, Petroff D, Kiess W, Blüher S. Physical activity in 3–6 year old children measured by SenseWear Pro_®: direct accelerometry in the course of the week and relation to weight status, media consumption, and socioeconomic factors.. PLoS One 2013; 8: e60619 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060619
• 13 Gebauer HU. Das Präventionsdilemma: Potenziale schulischer Kompetenzförderung im Spiegel sozialer Polarisierung. Heidelberg: Springer VS; 2005
• 14 Mühlig Y, Wabitsch M, Moos A. et al Gesichtsabnahme bei Kindern und Jugendlichen – Systematische übersicht und Auswertung von konservativen nichtpharmakologischen Adipositas-Behandlungsprogrammen.. Dtsch ärztebl Int 2014; 111: 818-824 doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0818
• 15 Haas L, Maryniuk M, Beck J. et al National standards for diabetes self-management education and support.. Diabetes Care 2014; 37 (Suppl. 01) S144-S153 doi: 10.2337/dc14-S144
• 16 Gerrald KR, Malone RM, Shilliday BB. Clinical benefit of self-monitoring of blood glucose is uncertain for non–insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes.. Clinical Diabetes 2010; 28: 121-123 doi: 10.2337/diaclin.28.3.121
• 17 Lorig K, Ritter PL, Turner RM. et al Benefits of diabetes self-management for health plan members: a 6-month translation study.. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18: e164 doi: 10.2196/jmir.5568
• 18 Brunisholz KD, Briot P, hamiton S. et al Diabetes self-management education improves quality of care and clinical outcomes determined by a diabetes bundle measure.. J Multidiscip Healthc 2014; 7: 533-542 doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S69000
• 19 Saha S, Riemenscheider H, Müller G. et al Comparative analysis of diabetes self-management education programs in the European Union Member States.. PrimaCare Diabetes 2017; 11: 529-537 doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2017.05.011
• 20 Turner RM, Ma Q, Long K. et al Evaluation of a diabetes self-management program: claims analysis on comorbid illnesses, health care utilization, and cost.. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20: e207 doi: 10.2196/jmir.9225
• 21 Mezuk B, Thornton W, Sealy-Jefferson S. et al Successfully managing diabetes in a community setting: evidence from the YMCA of Greater Richmond Diabetes Control Program.. Diabetes Educ 2018; 44: 383-394 doi: 10.1177/0145721718784265
• 22 Cunningham AT, Crittendon DR, White N. et al The effect of diabetes self-management education on HbA_1c and quality of life in African-Americans: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18: 367 doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3186-7
• 23 Hanlon P, Daines L, Campbell C. Telehealth interventions to support self-management of long-term conditions: a systematic metareview of diabetes, heart failure, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer.. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19: e172 doi: 10.2196/jmir.6688
• 24 Arambepola C, Ricci-Cabello I, Manikavasagan P. et al The impact of automated brief messages promoting lifestyle changes delivered via mobile devices to people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of controlled trials.. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18: e86 doi: 10.2196/jmir.5425
• 25 Bonoto BC, de Araujo VE, Godeoi IP al. Efficacy of mobile apps to support the care of patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017; 5: e4 doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6309
• 26 Jacques Rose K, Petrut C, L‘Heveder R, de Sabata S. IDF Europe position on mobile applications in diabetes.. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2017; Sep 7. pii: S0168-8227 (17) 31356-6 doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.08.020
• 27 Rosenstock IM. Why people use health services.. The Milbank Quarterly 2005; 83: 1-32 doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00425.x
• 28 Schwarzer R. Self-efficacy / thought control of action Washington: Hemisphere Pub. Corp. 1992
• 29 Riley WT, Rivera DE, Afienza AA. et al Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task?. Transl Behavl Med 2011; 1: 53-71 doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0021-7
• 30 Spencer-Bonilla G, Ponce OJ, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R. et al A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials of social network interventions in type 2 diabetes.. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e016506 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016506
• 31 Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior.. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991; 50: 179-211 doi 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
• 32 Dombrowski SU, Sniehotta F, Avenell A. et al Identifying active ingredients in complex behavioural interventions for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: a systematic review.. Health Psychology Review 2012; 6: 7-32 doi: 10.1080/17437199.2010.513298
• 33 Herrmann LK, Kim J. The fitness of apps: a theory-based examination of mobile fitness app usage over 5 months.. Mhealth 2017; 3: 2 doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2017.01.03
• 34 Goyal S, Nunn CA, Rotondi M. et al A mobile app for the self-management of type 1 diabetes among adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017; 5: e82 doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7336
• 35 Michaelides A, Major J, Pienkonsz Jr E . et al Usefulness of a novel mobile diabetes prevention program delivery platform with human coaching.. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018; 6: e93 doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9161
• 36 Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, Nacke L. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining „gamification“. In: Proceedings of the 15_th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments.. ACM; Tampere, Finland: 2011: 9-15
• 37 Hinyard LJ, Kreuter MW. Using narrative communication as a tool for health behavior change: a conceptual, theoretical, and empirical overview.. Health Educ Behav 2007; 34: 777-792 doi: 10.1177/1090198106291963
• 38 Green MC. Narratives and Cancer Communication.. J Commun 2006; 56: S163-S183 doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00288.x
• 39 Kamel Boulos MN. et al Digital games for type 1 and type 2 diabetes: underpinning theory with three illustrative examples.. JMIR Serious Games 2015; 3: e3 doi: 10.2196/games.3930
• 40 Kerfoot BP, Gagnon DR, McMahon GT. et al A team-based online game improves blood glucose control in veterans with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.. Diabetes Care 2017; 40: 1218-1225 doi: 10.2337/dc17-0310
• 41 Ledoux T, Griffith M, Thompson D. et al An educational video game for nutrition of young people: theory and design.. Simul Gaming 2016; 47: 490-516 doi: 10.1177/1046878116633331
• 42 Christensen J, Valentiner LS, Petersen RJ, Langberg H. et al The effect of game-based interventions in rehabilitation of diabetics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Telemed J E Health 2016; 22: 789-797 doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0165
• 43 Menachemi N, Burke DE, Ayers DJ. Factors affecting the adoption of relemedicine – a multiple adopter perspective.. J Med Syst 2004; 28: 617-632 doi: 10.1023/B:JOMS.0000044964.49821.df
• 44 Broens THF, Huis in't Veld RM, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM. et al. Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations. J Telemed Telecare 2007; 13: 303-309 doi: 10.1258/135763307781644951
• 45 Dittmar R, Wohlgemuth WA. Potenziale und Barrieren der Telemedizin in der Regelversorgung. G+G Wissenschaft 2009; (04) 16-26
• 46 Boonstra A, van Offenbeek M. Towards consistent modes of e-health implementation.. Information Systems Journal 2010; 20: 537-561 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.00358.x
• 47 Rho MJ, Kim HS, Chung K. et al Factors influencing the acceptance of telemedicine for diabetes management.. Cluster Comput 2015; 18: 321-331 10.1007/s10586-014-0356-1
• 48 Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY [u.a.]: Free Press; 2003. XXI, 551 S. Ill., graph. Darst., Kt.
• 49 Zanaboni P, Wootton R. Adoption of telemedicine: from pilot stage to routine delivery.. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012; 12: 1 doi: doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-1.
• 50 Standing C, Standing S, McDermott ML. et al The paradoxes of telehealth: a review of the literature 2000-2015.. Syst Res Behav Sci 2018; 35: 90-101 doi: 10.1002/sres.2442
• 51 Hastall M, Dockweiler C, Mühlhaus J. Achieving end user acceptance: building blocks for an evidence-based user-centered framework for health technology development and assessment. In: Antona M, Stephanidis C. (eds). Universal access in human–computer interaction: Human and technological environments New York: Springer; 2017: 13-25
• 52 Jordan S. et al An mHealth app for decision-making support in wound dressing selection (WounDS): protocol for a sser-centered feasibility study.. JMIR Res Protoc 2018; 7: e108 doi: 10.2196/resprot.9116
• 53 Diedrich L, Dockweiler C, Kupitz A, Homberg C. Telemonitoring bei herzinsuffizinez: Update zu gesundheiltichen und ökonomischen Implikationen.. Herz 2018; 43: 298-309 doi: 10.1007/s00059-017-4579-9
• 54 Bergmann JHM, McGregor AH. Body-worn sensor design: what do patients and clinicians want?. Ann Biomed Eng 2011; 39: 2299-2312 doi: 10.1007/s10439-011-0339-9
• 55 Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.. MIS Quarterly 1989; 13: 319-340 doi: 10.2307/249008
• 56 Venkatesh V, Morris M, davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view.. MIS Quarterly, 2003; 27: 425-478 doi: 10.2307/30036540
• 57 Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology.. MIS Quarterly 2012; 36: 157-178
• 58 Fishbein M. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1975
• 59 Okazaki S, Castaneda JA, Sanz S, Henseler J. Factors affecting mobile diabetes monitoring adoption among physicians: questionnaire study and path model.. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14: e183 doi: 10.2196/jmir.2159
• 60 DeLone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update.. J Manag Inf Syst 2003; 19: 9-30
• 61 Tuomilehto J, Lindström J, Eriksson JG. et al Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance.. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1343-1350 doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105033441801
• 62 Pajunen P. et al HbA(1c) in diagnosing and predicting type 2 diabetes in impaired glucose tolerance: the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study.. Diabet Med 2011; 28: 36-42 doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03183.x
• 63 Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) Research Group The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 2165-2171 doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.12.2165
• 64 Neugebauer EAM, Rath A, Antoine SL. et al Specific barriers to the conduct of randomised clinical trials on medical devices.. Trials 2017; 18: 427 doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2168-0
• 65 Muller G, Weser G, Schwarz PEH. The European perspective of diabetes prevention: The need for individualization of diabetes prevention.. J Endocrinol Invest 2013; 36: 352-357 doi: 10.1007/BF03347104
• 66 Cui M, Wu X, Mao J. et al. T2DM self-management via smartphone applications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0166718 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166718
• 67 Leppert F, Greiner W. Finanzierung und Evaluation von eHealth-Anwendungen. In: Fischer F, Krämer A (edts.).eHealth in Deutschland – Anforderungen und Potenziale innovativer Versorgungsstrukturen.. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg; 2016
• 68 Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG). Auf den Punkt gebracht: Zahlen und Fakten aus dem IQWiG 2017 www.iqwig.de/download/2017_IQWIG_Auf_den_Punkt_gebracht.pdf (letzer Zugriff: 30.11.2018)
• 69 Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen. Potenzial vorhanden? Der Medizinprodukte-Check www.iqwig.de/de/ueber-uns/10-jahre-iqwig/potenzial-vorhanden.6334.html (letzter Zugriff: 30.11.2018)
• 70 Hou C, Cartre B, Hewitt J. et al Do mobile phone applications improve glycemic control (HbA_1c) in the self-management of diabetes? A systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE of 14 randomized trials.. Diabetes Care 2016; 39: 2089-2095 doi: 10.2337/dc16-0346
• 71 Bashshur RL, Shannon GW, Smith BR. et al. The empirical evidence for the telemedicine intervention in diabetes management. Telemed J E Health 2015; 21: 321-354 doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0029
• 72 Arnold K, Scheibe M, Müller C. et al Grundsätze für die Evaluation telemedizinischer Anwendungen – Ergebnisse eines systematischen Reviews und Konsens-Verfahrens.. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Qualität und Fortbildung im Gesundheitswesen, 2016; 117: 9-19 doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2016.04.011
• 73 Timpel P, Harst L.. Effectiveness of telemedicine interventions for the most prevalent chronic diseases in German primary care – a protocol for an umbrella review [Poster], in 17. Deutscher Kongress für Versorgungsforschung (DKVF). Berlin, 10.–12.10.2018. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2018 Doc18dkvf200 2018; Berlin:
• 74 Kurth BM, Schaffrath Rosario A. Die Verbreitung von übergewicht und Adipositas bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland.. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 2007; 50: 736-743 doi: 10.1007/s00103-007-0253-3
• 75 Quilling E, Dadaczynski K, Müller M. Settingbezogene Prävention von übergewicht im Kindes- und Jugendalter.. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 2016; 59: 1394-1404 doi: 10.1007/s00103-016-2439-z
• 76 Baker MK, Simpson K, Lloyd B. et al. Behavioral strategies in diabetes prevention programs: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011; 91: 1-12 doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.06.030
• 77 Greaves CJ, Sheppard KE, Abraham C. et al Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions.. Bmc Public Health 2011; 11: 119 doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-119
• 78 Timpel P, Yue Cesena FH, Silva Costa C. et al Efficacy of gamification-based smartphone application for weight loss in overweight and obese adolescents: study protocol for a phase II randomized controlled trial.. Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism 2018; 9 (06) 167-176 https://doi.org/10.1177/2042018818770938.
• 79 Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med 2010; 8: 18 doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.09.004