Risk of cancer in 10 – 19 mm endoscopically detected colorectal lesions

Abstract

Background Recent data indicate that the risk of cancer in colorectal lesions < 10 mm is lower than previously reported, possibly reflecting improved detection of flat, low-volume lesions with a low risk of cancer. Few studies have examined the prevalence of cancer in colorectal lesions 10 – 19 mm in size.

Methods We reviewed a prospectively collected database of all colorectal lesions removed at a single endoscopy center in order to identify lesions of 10 – 19 mm in size and review their histology. Lesions ≥ 20 mm were evaluated as a control group. We reviewed photographs of cancerous lesions to determine the frequency of endoscopic features of cancer.

Results A total of 5093 lesions ≥ 10 mm were removed from 4020 patients (mean age 63.2 years, 34.4 % female). Among 3068 lesions 10 – 19 mm in size, 28 (0.9 %) had adenocarcinoma, including 1.2 % of conventional adenomas and 0.3 % of serrated class lesions. These rates were lower than the 6.9 % and 2.0 % rates of cancer found in conventional adenomatous lesions and serrated lesions ≥ 20 mm, respectively. Cancer was suggested by endoscopic features in 52.0 % of malignancies 10 – 19 mm in size compared with 79.2 % of lesions ≥ 20 mm.

Conclusions The prevalence of cancer in 10 – 19 mm colorectal lesions was much lower than previously reported. The cancer risk was higher in conventional adenomas than in serrated lesions. Cancer was endoscopically evident prior to resection in slightly more than half of colorectal lesions 10 – 19 mm in size.

• References

• 1 Kristjansdottir S, Jonasson JG, Cariglia N. et al. Colonic adenomas found via colonoscopy: yield and risk factors for high-grade dysplasia. Digestion 2010; 82: 252-257
• 2 Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1975; 36: 2251-2270
• 3 Kronborg O, Fenger C. Clinical evidence for the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Eur J Cancer Prev 1999; 8: S73-86
• 4 Peipins LA, Sandler RS. Epidemiology of colorectal adenomas. Epidemiol Rev 1994; 16: 273-297
• 5 Butterly LF, Chase MP, Pohl H. et al. Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 343-348
• 6 Yoo TW, Park DI, Kim YH. et al. Clinical significance of small colorectal adenoma less than 10 mm: the KASID study. Hepatogastroenterology 2007; 54: 418-421
• 7 Ponugoti PL, Cummings OW, Rex DK. Risk of cancer in small and diminutive colorectal polyps. Dig Liver Dis 2017; 49: 34-37
• 8 Gupta N, Bansal A, Rao D. et al. Prevalence of advanced histological features in diminutive and small colon polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 1022-1030
• 9 Denis B, Bottlaender J, Weiss AM. et al. Some diminutive colorectal polyps can be removed and discarded without pathologic examination. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 81-86
• 10 Tsai FC, Strum WB. Prevalence of advanced adenomas in small and diminutive colon polyps using direct measurement of size. Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56: 2384-2388
• 11 Chaput U, Alberto SF, Terris B. et al. Risk factors for advanced adenomas amongst small and diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective monocenter study. Dig Liver Dis 2011; 43: 609-612
• 12 Kudo S, Lambert R, Allen JI. et al. Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68 (Suppl. 04) S3-47
• 13 Bianco MA, Cipolletta L, Rotondano G. et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasia: an Italian multicenter observational study. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 279-285
• 14 Tsuda S, Veress B, Toth E. et al. Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study. Gut 2002; 51: 550-555
• 15 Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C. et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 270-297
• 16 Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J. et al. Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 1100-1105
• 17 Zafar A, Mustafa M, Chapman M. Colorectal polyps: when should we tattoo?. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 3264-3266
• 18 Odom SR, Duffy SD, Barone JE. et al. The rate of adenocarcinoma in endoscopically removed colorectal polyps. Am Surg 2005; 71: 1024-1026
• 19 Burnikel RH, Schutte AG. Adenomatous polyps of the rectum and distal sigmoid; a statistical analysis of 500 patients with polyps. Am J Surg 1954; 88: 378-383
• 20 Wilson GS, Dale EH, Brines OA. An evaluation of polyps detected in 20,847 routine sigmoidoscopic examinations. Am J Surg 1955; 90: 834-840
• 21 Shinya H, Wolff WI. Morphology, anatomic distribution and cancer potential of colonic polyps. Ann Surg 1979; 190: 679-683
• 22 Matek W, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, Demling L. Follow-up of patients with colorectal adenomas. Endoscopy 1985; 17: 175-181
• 23 Hermanek P. Dysplasia-carcinoma sequence, types of adenomas and early colo-rectal carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 1987; 13: 141-143
• 24 Pines A, Bat L, Shemesh E. et al. Clustering of colorectal neoplasia: characteristics of coexisting adenomas in patients with severely dysplastic polyps or invasive (malignant) polyps as compared to patients with benign adenomas or carcinomas. Postgrad Med J 1991; 67: 760-763
• 25 Netzer P, Forster C, Biral R. et al. Risk factor assessment of endoscopically removed malignant colorectal polyps. Gut 1998; 43: 669-674
• 26 Aldridge AJ, Simson JN. Histological assessment of colorectal adenomas by size Are polyps less than 10 mm in size clinically important? . Eur J Surg 2001; 167: 777-781
• 27 Fong TV, Chuah SK, Chiou SS. et al. Correlation of the morphology and size of colonic polyps with their histology. Chang Gung Med J 2003; 26: 339-343
• 28 Rex DK, Ahnen DJ, Baron JA. et al. Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 1315-1329
• 29 Rex DK, Helbig CC. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology 2007; 133: 42-47
• 30 Kahi C, Anderson J, Waxman I. et al. The American College of Gastroenterology high definition chromocolonoscopy study: findings and implications of colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: S559
• 31 Rex DK, Hardacker K, MacPhail M. et al. Determining the adenoma detection rate and adenomas per colonoscopy by photography alone: proof-of-concept study. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 245-250
• 32 Hetzel J, Huang CS, Coukos JA. et al. Variation in the detection of serrated polyps in an average risk colorectal cancer screening cohort. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 2656-2664
• 33 Arain MA, Sawhney M, Sheikh S. et al. CIMP status of interval colon cancers: another piece to the puzzle. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 1189-1195
• 34 Sawhney MS, Farrar WD, Gudiseva S. et al. Microsatellite instability in interval colon cancers. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 1700-1705