PDF herunterladen
Ultraschall Med 2019; 40(02): 237-246
DOI: 10.1055/a-0796-6584
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Comparison of Two-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography with Nine Serum Fibrosis Indices to Assess Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: A Prospective Cohort Study

Vergleich der 2-dimensionalen Scherwellen-Elastografie mit 9 Serumfibrose-Indizes zur Beurteilung der Leber-Fibrose bei Patienten mit chronischer Hepatitis B: Eine prospektive Kohortenstudie
Jianxue Liu
1   Infectious Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
2   Ultrasonography, The Affiliated Baoji Central Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Baoji, China
,
Yafeng Li
2   Ultrasonography, The Affiliated Baoji Central Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Baoji, China
,
Xueliang Yang
1   Infectious Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
,
Yonghao Ji
2   Ultrasonography, The Affiliated Baoji Central Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Baoji, China
,
Yaoren Zhang
2   Ultrasonography, The Affiliated Baoji Central Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Baoji, China
,
Qinyun Wan
2   Ultrasonography, The Affiliated Baoji Central Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Baoji, China
,
Guoliang Dun
2   Ultrasonography, The Affiliated Baoji Central Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Baoji, China
,
Shumei Lin
1   Infectious Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

02. Oktober 2018

02. November 2018

Publikationsdatum:
10. Januar 2019 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Purpose To prospectively assess liver fibrosis with two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and to compare the performance of this modality with that of serum indices using Scheuer scoring from liver biopsies as the reference standard.

Materials and Methods 123 patients with CHB underwent 2D-SWE measurements and serological tests between April 2016 and February 2018. The 2D-SWE and serum indices in the diagnosis of liver fibrosis were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.

Results The areas under ROC (AUCs) for 2D-SWE, aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index, fibrosis index based on the four factors, Forns score, King’s score, FibroIndex, red cell distribution width-to-platelet ratio, Hepascore, type IV collagen, and hyaluronic acid were 0.851, 0.738, 0.701, 0.739, 0.734, 0.711, 0.692, 0.601, 0.640, and 0.522, respectively, in the diagnosis of substantial fibrosis, 0.975, 0.819, 0.792, 0.829, 0.818, 0.807, 0.732, 0.572, 0.676, and 0.544, respectively, in the diagnosis of severe fibrosis, and 0.972, 0.883, 0.862, 0.908, 0.889, 0.918, 0.808, 0.601, 0.807, and 0.775, respectively, in the diagnosis of cirrhosis. The AUCs of 2D-SWE in the diagnosis of substantial fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis were significantly higher than those of the serum indices (p < 0.05).

Conclusion 2D-SWE is a reliable noninvasive method for the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with CHB with better diagnostic performance than that of nine serum fibrosis indices.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel Prospektive Beurteilung der Leber-Fibrose mit 2-dimensionaler Scherwellen-Elastografie (2D-SWE) bei Patienten mit chronischer Hepatitis B (CHB) und Vergleich der Treffsicherheit dieser Methode mit den Serumindizes unter Verwendung des Scheuer-Scores aus Leberbiopsien als Referenzstandard.

Material und Methoden 123 Patienten mit CHB wurden zwischen April 2016 und Februar 2018 den 2D-SWE-Messungen und serologischen Tests unterzogen. Die 2D-SWE und Serumindizes für die Diagnose von Leber-Fibrose wurden anhand von Receiver-Operating-Characteristic (ROC) -Analysen bewertet.

Ergebnisse Die „areas under ROC“ (AUCs) betrugen für die Diagnose einer a) erheblichen Fibrose und einer b) schweren Fibrose bzw. für die Diagnose einer c) Zirrhose für 2D-SWE: a) 0,851, b) 0,975c) 0,972; für die Aspartat-Transaminase/Thrombozyten-Ratio: a) 0,738, b) 0,819, c) 0,883; für den Fibrose-Index a) 0,701, b) 0,792, c) 0,862, basierend auf den 4 Faktoren, Forns-Score: a) 0,739, b) 0,829, c) 0,908; King-Score: a) 0,734, b) 0,818, c) 0,889; FibroIndex: a) 0,711, b) 0,807, c) 0,918; Erythrozyten-Verteilungsbreite/Thrombozyten-Ratio: a) 0,692, b) 0,732, c) 0,808; für den Hepa-Score a) 0,601, b) 0,572, c) 0,601; für Typ-IV-Kollagen a) 0,640, b) 0,676, c) 0,807 und für Hyaluronsäure a) 0,522, b) 0,544, c) 0,775. Die AUCs der 2D-SWE bei der Diagnose von erheblicher Fibrose (a), schwerer Fibrose (b) und Zirrhose (c) waren signifikant höher als die der Serumindizes (p < 0,05).

Schlussfolgerung 2D-SWE ist eine zuverlässige nichtinvasive Methode zur Beurteilung der Leber-Fibrose bei Patienten mit CHB und weist eine bessere diagnostische Leistung als die 9 Serum-Fibrose-Indizes auf.

Key words

elasticity imaging techniques - liver cirrhosis - serum markers - image-guided biopsy - hepatitis B
 

  • References

  • 1 Schweitzer A, Horn J, Mikolajczyk RT. et al. Estimations of worldwide prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a systematic review of data published between 1965 and 2013. Lancet (London, England) 2015; 386: 1546-1555
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Liu J, Zhang S, Wang Q. et al. Seroepidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection in 2 million men aged 21–49 years in rural China: a population-based, cross-sectional study. The Lancet Infectious diseases 2016; 16: 80-86
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wang FS, Fan JG, Zhang Z. et al. The global burden of liver disease: the major impact of China. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2014; 60: 2099-2108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K. et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet (London, England) 2012; 380: 2095-2128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 You CR, Lee SW, Jang JW. et al. Update on hepatitis B virus infection. World journal of gastroenterology 2014; 20: 13293-13305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cadranel JF, Rufat P, Degos F. Practices of liver biopsy in France: results of a prospective nationwide survey. For the Group of Epidemiology of the French Association for the Study of the Liver (AFEF). Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2000; 32: 477-481
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Filingeri V, Sforza D, Tisone G. Complications and risk factors of a large series of percutaneous liver biopsies in patients with liver transplantation or liver disease. European review for medical and pharmacological sciences 2015; 19: 1621-1629
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Regev A, Berho M, Jeffers LJ. et al. Sampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection. The American journal of gastroenterology 2002; 97: 2614-2618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rousselet MC, Michalak S, Dupre F. et al. Sources of variability in histological scoring of chronic viral hepatitis. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2005; 41: 257-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Singh S, Venkatesh SK, Wang Z. et al. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association 2015; 13: 440-451.e446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Fraquelli M, Rigamonti C, Casazza G. et al. Reproducibility of transient elastography in the evaluation of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut 2007; 56: 968-973
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Friedrich-Rust M, Buggisch P, de Knegt RJ. et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B. Journal of viral hepatitis 2013; 20: 240-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ferraioli G, Tinelli C, Dal Bello B. et al. Accuracy of real-time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: a pilot study. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2012; 56: 2125-2133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML. et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 1: basic principles and terminology. Ultrasound in medicine & biology 2015; 41: 1126-1147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Zeng J, Liu GJ, Huang ZP. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of two-dimensional shear wave elastography for the non-invasive staging of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B: a cohort study with internal validation. European radiology 2014; 24: 2572-2581
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Dietrich CF, Bamber J, Berzigotti A. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Liver Ultrasound Elastography, Update 2017 (Long Version). Ultraschall in der Medizin 2017; 38: e16-e47
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Cassinotto C, Lapuyade B, Mouries A. et al. Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis with impulse elastography: comparison of Supersonic Shear Imaging with ARFI and FibroScan(R). Journal of hepatology 2014; 61: 550-557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rostami S, Parsian H. Hyaluronic Acid: from biochemical characteristics to its clinical translation in assessment of liver fibrosis. Hepatitis monthly 2013; 13: e13787
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Tsutsumi M, Urashima S, Matsuda Y. et al. Changes in type IV collagen content in livers of patients with alcoholic liver disease. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 1993; 17: 820-827
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ. et al. A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2003; 38: 518-526
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Vallet-Pichard A, Mallet V, Nalpas B. et al. FIB-4: an inexpensive and accurate marker of fibrosis in HCV infection. Comparison with liver biopsy and fibrotest. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2007; 46: 32-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Forns X, Ampurdanes S, Llovet JM. et al. Identification of chronic hepatitis C patients without hepatic fibrosis by a simple predictive model. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2002; 36: 986-992
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Cross TJ, Rizzi P, Berry PA. et al. King's Score: an accurate marker of cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C. European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology 2009; 21: 730-738
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Koda M, Matunaga Y, Kawakami M. et al. FibroIndex, a practical index for predicting significant fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2007; 45: 297-306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Chen B, Ye B, Zhang J. et al. RDW to platelet ratio: a novel noninvasive index for predicting hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis B. PloS one 2013; 8: e68780
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Adams LA, Bulsara M, Rossi E. et al. Hepascore: an accurate validated predictor of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C infection. Clinical chemistry 2005; 51: 1867-1873
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ucar F, Sezer S, Ginis Z. et al. APRI, the FIB-4 score, and Forn's index have noninvasive diagnostic value for liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B. European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology 2013; 25: 1076-1081
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Teshale E, Lu M, Rupp LB. et al. APRI and FIB-4 are good predictors of the stage of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B: the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study (CHeCS). Journal of viral hepatitis 2014; 21: 917-920
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Salkic NN, Jovanovic P, Hauser G. et al. FibroTest/Fibrosure for significant liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis B: a meta-analysis. The American journal of gastroenterology 2014; 109: 796-809
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Silva Junior RG, Schmillevitch J, Nascimento Mde F. et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography and serum fibrosis markers in chronic hepatitis C. Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology 2014; 49: 986-992
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Zhuang Y, Ding H, Zhang Y. et al. Two-dimensional Shear-Wave Elastography Performance in the Noninvasive Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: Comparison with Serum Fibrosis Indexes. Radiology 2017; 283: 873-882
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Poynard T, Munteanu M, Luckina E. et al. Liver fibrosis evaluation using real-time shear wave elastography: applicability and diagnostic performance using methods without a gold standard. Journal of hepatology 2013; 58: 928-935
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Zheng J, Guo H, Zeng J. et al. Two-dimensional shear-wave elastography and conventional US: the optimal evaluation of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Radiology 2015; 275: 290-300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Ding H, Ma JJ, Wang WP. et al. Assessment of liver fibrosis: the relationship between point shear wave elastography and quantitative histological analysis. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2015; 30: 553-558
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Muller M, Gennisson JL, Deffieux T. et al. Quantitative viscoelasticity mapping of human liver using supersonic shear imaging: preliminary in vivo feasibility study. Ultrasound in medicine & biology 2009; 35: 219-229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Wang K, Lu X, Zhou H. et al. Deep learning Radiomics of shear wave elastography significantly improved diagnostic performance for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B: a prospective multicentre study. Gut 2018; DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316204.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Ferraioli G, Tinelli C, Zicchetti M. et al. Reproducibility of real-time shear wave elastography in the evaluation of liver elasticity. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 3102-3106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar