Download PDF
PiD - Psychotherapie im Dialog 2019; 20(04): 28-33
DOI: 10.1055/a-0771-7901
Aus der Praxis
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Evidenzbasierte-personalisierte Psychotherapie: psychometrisches Feedback in der Praxis

Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer
,
Kaitlyn Boyle
,
Wolfgang Lutz
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 November 2019 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Technische Entwicklungen der letzten 20 Jahre eröffnen neue Chancen und Möglichkeiten in Bezug auf Datenerhebungen, grafische Verlaufsrückmeldungen und Unterstützungsmöglichkeiten in der psychotherapeutischen Praxis. Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über den aktuellen Stand der Feedbackforschung und zeigt, wie eine evidenzbasierte und personalisierte Psychotherapiepraxis mit psychometrischem Feedback aussehen kann.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Lambert MJ, Ogles BM. The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In: Lambert MJ. ed. Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. 5th ed.. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2004: 139-193
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJ. et al. The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Cognit Ther Res 2012; 36: 427-440 doi:10.1007/S10608–013–9595–3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wampold BE, Imel ZE, Flückiger C. Die Psychotherapie-Debatte: Was Psychotherapie wirksam macht. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2018. doi: 10.1024/85681–000
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Hansen N, Lambert MJ, Forman EM. The psychotherapy dose-response effect and its implications for treatment delivery services. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2002; 9: 329-343 doi:10.1093/clipsy.9.3.329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Walfish S, McAlister B, O’donnell P. et al. An investigation of self-assessment bias in mental health providers. Psychol Rep 2012; 110: 639-644 doi:10.2466/02.07.17.PR0.110.2.639–644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Castonguay LG, Barkham M, Lutz W. et al. Practice oriented research: Approaches and applications. In Lambert MJ. ed. Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. 6th ed.. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2013: 85-133
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Bar-Kalifa E, Atzil-Slonim D, Rafaeli E. et al. Therapist-client agreement in assessments of clients’ functioning. J Consult Clin Psychol 2016; 84: 1127-1134 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kendrick T, El-Gohary M, Stuart B. et al. Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 7: 1-103
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Delgadillo J, de Jong K, Lucock M. et al. Feedback-informed treatment versus usual psychological treatment for depression and anxiety: a multisite, open-label, cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2018; 5: 564-572 doi:10.1016/S2215–0366(18)30162–7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lambert MJ, Whipple JL, Kleinstäuber M. Collecting and delivering progress feedback. A meta-analysis of routine outcome monitoring. Psychotherapy 2018; 55: 520-537 doi:10.1037/pst0000167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lambert M. Presidential address: What we have learned from a decade of research aimed at improving psychotherapy outcome in routine care. Psychother Res 2007; 17: 1-14 doi: 10.1080/10503300601032506
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cuijpers P, Christensen H. Are personalised treatments of adult depression finally within reach?. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2017; 26: 40-42 doi:10.1017/S204579601600007X
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Lutz W, Zimmermann D, Müller VN. et al. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of personalized prediction and adaptation tools on treatment outcome in outpatient psychotherapy: study protocol. BMC psychiatry 2017; 17: 306 doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888–017–1464–2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 De Jong K, van Sluis P, Nugter MA. et al. Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: Therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial. Psychother Res 2012; 22: 464-474 doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.673023
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Simon W, Lambert MJ, Harris MW. et al. Providing patient progress information and clinical support tools to therapists: Effects on patients at risk of treatment failure. Psychother Res 2012; 22: 638-647 doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.698918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lutz W, Rubel J, Schiefele AK. et al. Feedback and therapist effects in the context of treatment outcome and treatment length. Psychother Res 2015; 25: 647-660 doi:10.1080/10503307.2015.1053553
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lutz W, Rubel JA, Schwartz B. et al. Towards integrating personalized feedback research into clinical practice: Development of the Trier Treatment Navigator (TTN). Behav Res Ther 2019; 8 doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103438
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lutz W, Neu R, Rubel JA. Evaluation und Effekterfassung in der Psychotherapie. In Hautzinger M, Hahlweg K, Margraf J. et al., Hrsg. Standards der Psychotherapie Band 5. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2019. doi:10.1026/02912–000
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Boyle K, Deisenhofer AK, Rubel JA. et al. Assessing Treatment Integrity in Personalized CBT; The Inventory of Therapeutic Interventions and Skills. Cogn Behav Ther 2019; 2: 1-18 doi: 10.1080/16506073.2019.1625945
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. Evidence-Based Practice in Psychology. Am Psychol 2006; 61: 271-285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Weck F, Kaufmann YM, Höfling V. Competence feedback improves CBT competence in trainee therapists: A randomized controlled pilot study. Psychother Res 2017; 27: 501-509 doi:10.1080/10503307.2015.1132857
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Zimmermann D, Rubel J, Page AC. et al. Therapist effects on and predictors of non-consensual dropout in psychotherapy. Clin Psychol Psychother 2016; 24: 312-321 doi:10.1002/cpp.2022
    PubMedGoogle Scholar