Z Orthop Unfall 2019; 157(04): 392-399
DOI: 10.1055/a-0751-3156
Review/Übersicht
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

Reading, Understanding, InterpretingReading, Understanding, InterpretingArticle in several languages: English | deutsch
Sebastian Scheidt
1  Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
,
Patrick Vavken
2  Orthopädie, alphaclinic Zürich, Schweiz
,
Cornelius Jacobs
1  Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
,
Sebastian Koob
1  Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
,
Davide Cucchi
1  Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
,
Eva Kaup
1  Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
,
Dieter Christian Wirtz
1  Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
,
Matthias D. Wimmer
1  Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 November 2018 (eFirst)

Abstract

The rising number of medical publications makes it difficult to keep up-to-date on scientific knowledge. In recent years, reviews in the form of narrative or systematic publications and meta-analyses have increased. These can only be interpreted and evaluated if the reader understands the techniques used. This review article describes the differences between narrative and systematic reviews, together with the characteristics of meta-analysis, and discusses their interpretation. The concept of systematic reviews and meta-analysis includes a systematic literature search and summary, together with an appraisal of the quality of the publications. Systematic reviews are often considered to be original studies due to their structure and ability to reduce bias.