CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2018; 06(08): E1059-E1064
DOI: 10.1055/a-0600-2157
Original article
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018

Two-year retrospective analysis of patients undergoing direct to procedure flexible sigmoidoscopy investigation with rectal bleeding as a primary complaint

Henry H. Nguyen
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary AB, Canada
,
Robert Bechara
2   Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Unit (GIDRU), Department of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston ON, Canada
,
William G. Paterson
2   Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Unit (GIDRU), Department of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston ON, Canada
,
Lawrence C. Hookey
2   Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Unit (GIDRU), Department of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston ON, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 17 March 2017

accepted after revision 08 September 2017

Publication Date:
10 August 2018 (online)

Abstract

Background and aims Rectal bleeding affects ~15 % of the general population and is a common reason for referral to gastroenterologists by primary care physicians. Direct to procedure flexible sigmoidoscopy is an appealing modality to investigate rectal bleeding due its diagnostic yield, safety profile, and accessibility. Patients referred on a routine basis for direct to procedure clinic by primary care physicians with the sole complaint of rectal bleeding have not previously been studied. Our study aims to explore the spectrum of diagnoses and evaluate for potential clinical predictors of underlying pathology in this specific patient population.

Methods In total, 528 charts of patients referred to the Kingston General Hospital and Hotel Dieu Hospital endoscopy units (Kingston, Canada) with the sole complaint of rectal bleeding were reviewed. All of these patients were referred on a routine basis to direct to procedure clinic from primary care physicians. The performance of various clinical variables in predicting significant pathology was assessed by univariate analysis.

Results The diagnostic spectrum of the cohort studied included hemorrhoids (75.5 %), anal fissures (4 %), ulcerative colitis (3.2 %), Crohn’s disease (1.1 %), indeterminate proctitis/colitis (1.7 %), and colorectal malignancy (2.7 %). Of the various clinical variables assessed, only male sex predicted significant pathology (25.2 % of males vs 17.6 % of females, P < 0.05).

Conclusion Our study highlights the need for a thorough investigation of rectal bleeding given the lack of clinical predictors. Future prospective studies with more patients are needed to fully assess the utility of various clinical variables in predicting pathology in this patient population. This would allow for more effective triaging of a routine rectal bleeding, a very common reason for patient referral to gastroenterologists by primary care physicians. Flexible sigmoidoscopy was not associated with complications or missed diagnosis in our study. As such, the technique appears to be a suitable initial investigative modality for patients with rectal bleeding.

 
  • References

  • 1 Talley NJ, Jones M. Self-reported rectal bleeding in a United States community: prevalence, risk factors, and health care seeking. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 2179-2183
  • 2 Thompson JA, Pond CI, Ellis BG. et al. Rectal bleeding in general and hospital practice; “the tip of the iceberg.”. Colorectal Dis 2000; 2: 288-293
  • 3 Ahmad NZ, Ahmed A. Rigid or flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal clinics? Appraisal through a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012; 22: 479-487
  • 4 McCallum RW, Meyer CT, Marignani P. et al. Flexible sigmoidoscopy: diagnostic yield in 1015 patients. Am J Gastroenterol 1984; 79: 433-437
  • 5 MacKenzie S, Norrie J, Vella M. et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing consultant-led or open access investigation for large bowel symptoms. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 941-947
  • 6 Church JM. Analysis of the colonoscopic findings in patients with rectal bleeding according to the pattern of their presenting symptoms. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 391-395
  • 7 Shinya H, Cwern M, Wolf G. Colonoscopic diagnosis and management of rectal bleeding. Surg Clin North Am 1982; 62: 897-903
  • 8 Lee JSJ, Rieger NA, Stephens JH. et al. Six-year prospective analysis of the rectal bleeding clinic at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia. ANZ J Surg 2007; 77: 553-556
  • 9 Ellis BG, Thompson MR. Factors identifying higher risk rectal bleeding in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55: 949-955
  • 10 Choi HK, Law WL, Chu KW. The value of flexible sigmoidoscopy for patients with bright red rectal bleeding. Hong Kong Med J Xianggang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2003; 9: 171-174
  • 11 Molodecky NA, Soon IS, Rabi DM. et al. Increasing incidence and prevalence of the inflammatory bowel diseases with time, based on systematic review. Gastroenterology 2012; 142: 46-54 .e42; quiz e30
  • 12 Ng SC, Tang W, Ching JY. et al. Asia–Pacific Crohn’s and Colitis Epidemiologic Study (ACCESS) Study Group. Incidence and phenotype of inflammatory bowel disease based on results from the Asia-pacific Crohn’s and colitis epidemiology study. Gastroenterology 2013; 145: 158-165 .e2
  • 13 Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY. et al. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. NEJM 2000; 343: 169-174
  • 14 Schoenfeld P, Cash B, Flood A. et al. CONCeRN Study Investigators. Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia. NEJM 2005; 352: 2061-2068
  • 15 Loftus EV, Silverstein MD, Sandborn WJ. et al. Ulcerative colitis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1940 – 1993: incidence, prevalence, and survival. Gut 2000; 46: 336-343
  • 16 Robertson R, Campbell C, Weller DP. et al. Predicting colorectal cancer risk in patients with rectal bleeding. Br J Gen Pract 2006; 56: 763-767
  • 17 Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Hollander T. et al. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 1197-1203
  • 18 Parks TG. Post-mortem studies on the colon with special reference to diverticular disease. Proc R Soc Med 1968; 61: 932-934
  • 19 Peery AF, Barrett PR, Park D. et al. A high-fiber diet does not protect against asymptomatic diverticulosis. Gastroenterology 2012; 142: 266-272.e1
  • 20 Strate LL, Gralnek IM. ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111: 459-474
  • 21 Gralnek IM, Neeman Z, Strate LL. Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. NEJM 2017; 376: 1054-1063
  • 22 Moss AJ, Tuffaha H, Malik A. Lower GI bleeding: a review of current management, controversies and advances. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016; 31: 175-188
  • 23 Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF. Risk for colorectal cancer in persons with a family history of adenomatous polyps: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2012; 156: 703-709
  • 24 Olde Bekkink M, McCowan C, Falk GA. et al. Diagnostic accuracy systematic review of rectal bleeding in combination with other symptoms, signs and tests in relation to colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2010; 102: 48-58
  • 25 Lanas Á, Carrera-Lasfuentes P, Arguedas Y. et al. Risk of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiplatelet agents, or anticoagulants. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 906-912.e2
  • 26 Lanas-Gimeno A, Lanas A. Risk of gastrointestinal bleeding during anticoagulant treatment. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2017; 16: 673-685
  • 27 Sherwood MW, Nessel CC, Hellkamp AS. et al. Gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin: ROCKET AF Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66: 2271-2281