CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2018; 06(06): E714-E721
DOI: 10.1055/a-0599-6190
Original article
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018

Safety and efficacy of self-expanding metal stents for biliary drainage in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer

Darren D. Ballard
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.
,
Syed Rahman
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.
,
Brian Ginnebaugh
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.
,
Abdul Khan
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.
,
Kulwinder S. Dua
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 08 November 2017

accepted after revision 20 February 2018

Publication Date:
25 May 2018 (online)

Abstract

Background and study aims Durable biliary drainage is essential during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with pancreatic cancer who present with biliary obstruction. Plastic stents (PS) tend to occlude readily, resulting in delay/interruption of treatment. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) for biliary drainage in patients receiving NAT for pancreatic cancer.

Patients and methods From 2009 to 2014, all consecutive patients with resectable pancreatic cancer at one tertiary center had SEMS placed for biliary drainage before NAT was started. Data on biliary drainage efficacy, stent malfunction rates and procedural adverse events were collected.

Results One hundred forty-two consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer (mean age 66 ± 9 SD years; 81 male, 61 female; 67 resectable, 75 borderline resectable) were enrolled. Eight-seven patients (61 %) had prior PS exchanged to SEMS and 55 (39 %) had SEMS placed upfront. Median duration from SEMS placement to the end of NAT/surgery was 111 days (range 44 – 282). During NAT, SEMS malfunction requiring reintervention occurred in 16 patients (11.2 %): tissue ingrowth 11, stent occlusion from food 6, stent migration 3, incomplete expansion 1, “tissue cheese-cutter” effect 1, and cystic duct obstruction 1. On subgroup analysis, no correlation between SEMS malfunction and stage of disease, prior PS, or duration of NAT was found (r2 = 0.05, P = 0.34). Presence of SEMS in situ did not affect pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Conclusion SEMS provide safe, effective and durable biliary drainage during NAT for pancreas cancer. Previously placed PS can be exchanged for SEMS. SEMS do not require removal prior to surgery.

Meeting presentations: Digestive Disease Week 2015 and 2017

 
  • References

  • 1 Christians KK, Heimler JW, George B. et al. Survival of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy. Surgery 2016; 159: 893-900
  • 2 Rashid OM, Pimiento JM, Gamenthaler AW. et al. Outcomes of a clinical pathway for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23: 1371-1379
  • 3 Mellon EA, Hoffe SE, Springett GM. et al. Long-term outcomes of induction chemotherapy and neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiotherapy for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Acta Oncol 2015; 54: 979-985
  • 4 Tang K, Lu W, Qin W. et al. Neoadjuvant therapy for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. Pancreatology 2016; 16: 28-37
  • 5 Fathi A, Christians KK, George B. et al. Neoadjuvant therapy for localized pancreatic cancer: guiding principles. J Gastrointest Oncol 2015; 6: 418-429
  • 6 Porta M, Fabregat X, Malats N. et al. Exocrine pancreatic cancer: symptoms at presentation and their relation to tumour site and stage. Clin Transl Oncol 2005; 7: 189-197
  • 7 van der Gaag NA, Rauws EA, van Eijck CH. et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 129-137
  • 8 Boulay BR, Gardner TB, Gordon SR. Occlusion rate and complications of plastic biliary stent placement in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer with malignant biliary obstruction. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 44: 452-455
  • 9 Aadam AA, Evans DB, Khan A. et al. Efficacy and safety of self-expandable metal stents for biliary decompression in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 67-75
  • 10 Wolff RA, Varadhachary GR, Evans DB. Adjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: analysis of reported trials and recommendations for future progress. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15: 2773-2786
  • 11 Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66: 7-30
  • 12 Morris-Stiff G, Tamijmarane A, Tan YM. et al. Pre-operative stenting is associated with a higher prevalence of post-operative complications following pancreatoduodenectomy. Int J Surg 2011; 9: 145-149
  • 13 Corsini MM, Miller RC, Haddock MG. et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for pancreatic carcinoma: the Mayo Clinic experience (1975–2005). J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3511-3516
  • 14 Yeo CJ, Abrams RA, Grochow LB. et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation improves survival. A prospective, single-institution experience. Ann Surg 1997; 225: 621-633 ; discussion 633-626
  • 15 Bergquist JR, Puig CA, Shubert CR. et al. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 elevation in anatomically resectable, early-stage pancreatic cancer is independently associated with decreased overall survival and an indication for neoadjuvant therapy: a national cancer database study. J Am Coll Surg 2016; 223: 52-65
  • 16 Ielpo B, Duran H, Diaz E. et al. Preoperative treatment with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is a safe and effective chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42: 1394-1400
  • 17 Casadei R, Di Marco M, Ricci C. et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone in resectable pancreatic cancer: a single-center prospective, randomized, controlled trial which failed to achieve accrual targets. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19: 1802-1812
  • 18 Golcher H, Brunner TB, Witzigmann H. et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with gemcitabine/cisplatin and surgery versus immediate surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer: results of the first prospective randomized phase II trial. Strahlenther Onkol 2015; 191: 7-16
  • 19 Varadhachary GR, Wolff RA, Crane CH. et al. Preoperative gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3487-3495
  • 20 Spitz FR, Abbruzzese JL, Lee JE. et al. Preoperative and postoperative chemoradiation strategies in patients treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 928-937
  • 21 Walter D, van Boeckel PG, Groenen MJ. et al. Cost Efficacy of metal stents for palliation of extrahepatic bile duct obstruction in a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2015; 149: 130-138
  • 22 Mullen JT, Lee JH, Gomez HF. et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy after placement of endobiliary metal stents. J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9: 1094-1104 ; discussion 1104-1095
  • 23 Wasan SM, Ross WA, Staerkel GA. et al. Use of expandable metallic biliary stents in resectable pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 2056-2061
  • 24 Adams MA, Anderson MA, Myles JD. et al. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) provide superior outcomes compared to plastic stents for pancreatic cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. J Gastrointest Oncol 2012; 3: 309-313