Carbon dioxide versus air insufflation enteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
submitted 16. August 2017
accepted after revision 08. Januar 2018
25. Mai 2018 (online)
Objectives To compare the insufflation of CO2 and ambient air in enteroscopy.
Search sources The investigators researched the electronic databases MedLine, Cochrane Library, Central, LILACS, BVS, Scopus and Cinahl. The grey search was conducted in the base of theses of the University of São Paulo, books of digestive endoscopy and references of selected articles and in previous systematic revisions.
Study eligibility criteria The evaluation of eligibility was performed independently, in a non-blind manner, by two reviewers, firstly by title and abstract, followed by complete text. Disagreements between the reviewers were resolved by consensus.
Data collection and analysis method Through the spreadsheet of data extraction, where one author extracted the data and a second author checked the extraction. Disagreements were resolved by debate between the two reviewers. The quality analysis of the studies was performed using the Jadad score. The software RevMan 5 version 5.3 was used for the meta-analysis.
Results Four randomized clinical trials were identified, totaling 473 patients submitted to enteroscopy and comparing insufflation of CO2 and ambient air. There was no statistical difference in the intubation depth between the two groups. When CO2 insufflation was reduced, there was a significant difference in pain levels 1 hour after the procedure (95 % IC, –2.49 [–4.72, –0.26], P: 0.03, I2: 20%) and 3 hours after the procedure (95% IC, –3.05 [–5.92, –0.18], P: 0.04, I2: 0 %). There was a usage of lower propofol dosage in the CO2 insufflation group, with significant difference (95 % IC, –67.68 [–115.53, –19.84], P: 0.006, I2: 0 %). There was no significant difference between the groups in relation to the use of pethidine and to the oxygen saturation.
Limitations Restricted number of randomized clinical trials and nonuniformity of data were limitations to the analysis of the outcomes.
Conclusion The use of CO2 as insufflation gas in enteroscopy reduces the pain levels 1 hour and 3 hours after the procedure, in addition to the reduction of the sedation (propofol) dosage used.
- 1 Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y. et al. Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 216-220
- 2 Tsujikawa T, Saitoh Y, Andoh A. et al. Novel single-balloon enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of the small intestine: preliminary experiences. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 11-15
- 3 Wang WL, Wu ZH, Sun Q. et al. Meta-analysis: the use of carbon dioxide insufflation vs. room air insufflation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012; 35: 1145-1154
- 4 Sumanac K, Zealley I, Fox BM. et al. Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO2 insufflation: a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial evaluating a new commercially available CO2 delivery system. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 190-194
- 5 Nishizawa T, Suzuki H, Fujimoto A. et al. Effects of carbon dioxide insufflation in balloon-assisted enteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterol J 2016; 4: 11-17
- 6 Shiani A, Lipka S, Lai A. et al. Carbon dioxide versus room air insufflation during balloon-assisted enteroscopy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5: E67-E75
- 7 Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 2015; 350: g7647
- 8 Domagk D, Bretthauer M, Lenz P. et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation improves intubation depth in double-balloon enteroscopy: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 1064-1067
- 9 Lenz P, Meister T, Manno M. et al. CO2 insufflation during single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 53-58
- 10 Hook EB, Regal RR. Accuracy of alternative approaches to capture-recapture estimates of disease frequency: internal validity analysis of data from five sources. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 152: 771-779
- 11 Hook EB, Regal RR. Recommendations for presentation and evaluation of capture-recapture estimates in epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52: 917-926
- 12 Higgins J, Green SE. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011 Available at www.cochrane-handbook.org
- 13 Hirai F, Beppu T, Nishimura T. et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation compared with air insufflation in double-balloon enteroscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 743-749
- 14 Li X, Zhao YJ, Dai J. et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation improves the intubation depth and total enteroscopy rate in single-balloon enteroscopy: a randomised, controlled, double-blind trial. Gut 2014; 63: 1560-1565
- 15 Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D. et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1-12
- 16 Dellon ES, Hawk JS, Grimm IS. et al. The use of carbon dioxide for insufflation during GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 843-849
- 17 May A, Nachbar L, Wardak A. et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy: preliminary experience in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding or chronic abdominal pain. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 985-991
- 18 Kopacova M, Tacheci I, Rejchrt S. et al. Double balloon enteroscopy and acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 2331-2340
- 19 Church J, Delaney C. Randomized, controlled trial of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 322-326
- 20 Bretthauer M, Thiis-Evensen E, Huppertz-Hauss G. et al. NORCCAP: a randomized trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation in colonoscopy. Gut 2002; 50: 604-607
- 21 Geyer M, Guller U, Beglinger C. Carbon dioxide insufflation in routine colonoscopy is safe and more comfortable: results of a randomized controlled double-blinded trial. Diagn Ther Endosc 2011; 2011: 378906
- 22 Nonaka S, Saito Y, Takisawa H. et al. Safety of carbon dioxide insufflation for upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopic treatment of patients under deep sedation. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 1638-1645