Download PDF
Homeopathy 2002; 91(01): 18-21
DOI: 10.1054/homp.2001.0015
Original Paper
Copyright © The Faculty of Homeopathy 2002

Homeopathy and health related Quality of Life: A survey in six European countries

M Anelli
1   CONSEUR: European Consumers Association, chaussée de Bruxelles, 132, B-1190, Brussels, Belgium
,
L Scheepers
2   European Committee for Homeopathy, chaussée de Bruxelles, 132, B-1190, Brussels, Belgium
,
G Sermeus
1   CONSEUR: European Consumers Association, chaussée de Bruxelles, 132, B-1190, Brussels, Belgium
,
M Van Wassenhoven
2   European Committee for Homeopathy, chaussée de Bruxelles, 132, B-1190, Brussels, Belgium
› Author Affiliations
Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

Received12 October 2000
revised24 April 2001

accepted30 July 2001

Publication Date:
28 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

A pilot survey of 1025 patients receiving homeopathic treatment in six European countries is reported. An initial questionnaire included demographic information and questions from health-related Quality of Life (QoL) scales. A follow-up questionnaire collected data on changes in QoL. The demographic characteristics of respondents were similar to previous studies. 82.8% of respondents had previously tried conventional treatments. Satisfaction with consultations was high. The changes of QoL status are positive but weak. 2.7% of patients experienced side-effects which they attribute to homeopathic treatment. 7.8% of patients reported significant aggravation at the beginning of the homeopathic treatment, 25.4% slight aggravation of symptoms. A new survey should be performed with a better motivation of doctors and patients. Further description of treatment would be helpful.

Keywords

homeopathy - Europe - quality of life evaluation - prospective survey
 

  • References

  • 1 Guadagnoli E, Mc Nail BJ. Outcomes research: hope for the future or latest rage?. Inquiry 1994; 31: 14-24.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rapier CM. An Introduction to Outcomes Research. Surrey: Brookwood Medical Publications; 1996.
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Mc Horney C, Ware JE, Roger W, Raczek A, Lu J FR. The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the medical outcomes study. Med Care 1992; 30: 253-265.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Heger M, Riley DS, Haidvogl M. International integrative primary care outcomes study (IIPCOS-2): an international research project of homeopathy in primary care. Br Hom J 2000; 89: S10-S13.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Willan A, Griffith LE. Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47: 81-87.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clin Trials 1989; 10: 407-415.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar