Homeopathy 2003; 92(02): 77-83
DOI: 10.1016/s1475-4916-03-00005-5
Original Paper
Copyright © The Faculty of Homeopathy 2003

Homeopathic remedies as metaphors in family therapy. A narrative-based approach to homeopathy

M Konitzer
1  Department of General Practice, Medical School of Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, Germany
,
A Renée
2  Technical Language Center, University of Hannover, Welfengarten 1, Hannover, Germany
,
T Doering
1  Department of General Practice, Medical School of Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, Germany
› Author Affiliations

Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

Received05 August 2002
revised29 October 2002

accepted11 November 2002

Publication Date:
27 December 2017 (online)

Abstract

Objective: To examine a metaphorical, narrative model to explain the outcome of an homeopathic encounter involving the patient, practitioner and the homeopathic medicine.

Material and Methods: The transcript of a videotaped doctor–patient interaction from a European doctor–patient communication study (EUROCOM) was analysed using qualitative methods.

Results: Analysis demonstrates a narrative relationship between the protagonists in the therapeutic interaction, with the homeopathic medicine performing a metaphorical role.

Discussion: The results justify further investigation of the narrative and metaphorical properties of the therapeutic encounter in homeopathy.

 
  • References

  • 1 Simon FB, Clement U, Stierlin H. Die Sprache der Familientherapie. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1999.
  • 2 White H. Metahistory. The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973.
  • 3 McWhinney IR. A Textbook of Family Medicine, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
  • 4 Lakoff G, Johnson M. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
  • 5 Greenhalgh T, Hurwitz H (eds). Narrative Based Medicine. London: BMJ Books, 1999.
  • 6 Hawkins AH. Reconstructing Illness. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 1999.
  • 7 Benedict D. Confessions of a Kamikaze Cowboy. North Hollywood, CA: Newcastle Publishing Co. Inc., 1987.
  • 8 Sims PA, Whynot CA. Hearing metaphor: An approach to working with family centered metaphor. Family Process 1997; 36: 341–356.
  • 9 Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G, et al. Overviews and meta-analyses of controlled clinical trials of homoeopathy. In: Ernst E, Hahn EG (eds). Homoeopathy. A Critical Appraisal. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1998, pp 101–106.
  • 10 Kleinman A. Patient and Healers in the Context of Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981.
  • 11 Blumer H. Symbolic Interactionism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.
  • 12 Hahnemann S. Organon of Medicine. Blaine, WA: Cooper Publishing (1842, transl Naud’e, A), 1996.
  • 13 Eco U. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1976.
  • 14 von Uexküll Th. Das Placebo-Phänomen. In: Th. von Uexküll, (ed). Psychosomatische Medizin. München: Urban und Schwarzenberg. 1996.
  • 15 Mitchell A, Cormack M. The Therapeutic Relationship in Complementary Health Care. New York: Churchill-Livingstone, 1998.
  • 16 Schmeer E.H. Hahnemann und Paracelsus. Allg Homöopath Zg 1993; 238: 155–159.
  • 17 Pagel W. Paracelsus. An Introduction to Philosophical Medicine in the Era of Renaissance, 2nd revised edn Basel: Karger, 1982.
  • 18 Coulter Harris L. Divided Legacy. The Origins of Modern Western Medicine: J.B. van Helmont to Claude Bernard. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books, 1988.
  • 19 Schonauer K. Semiotic Foundations of Drug Therapy. Berlin: Mouton, 1994.
  • 20 Kneipp S. My Watercure, Transl. From the 62nd German Edition. Pomeroy WA: Health Research, 1956.
  • 21 Steiner R. Introducing Anthroposophical Medicine. Transl. Creeger CE. Hudson, NY: Anthroposophic Press, 1999.
  • 22 Hahnemann S. In: RE Dadgeon (ed). Lesser Writings. New York: Radde, 1892.
  • 23 Jewson ND. Medical knowledge and the patronage system in eighteenth-century England. Sociology 1974; 8: 369–385.
  • 24 Trueuherz F. The Origins of Kent's Homoeopathy. J Am Inst Hom 1984; 77: 130–150.
  • 25 Walach H. Homoeopathy as semiotic. Semiotica 1991; 83: 81–95.
  • 26 Swayne J. Homoeopathic Method. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1998.
  • 27 Mangialavori M. Finding the remedy. Br Hom J 1998; 87: 210–215.
  • 28 Whitmont EC Psyche and Substance: Essays on Homoeopathy in the Light of Jungian Psychology. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books, 1991.
  • 29 Strauss AL. Social Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
  • 30 van den Brink–Muinen A, Verhaak P. Doctor–patient communication in European countries. Patient Educ Counseling 1998; 34: S36–37.
  • 31 Coffey A, Atkinson P. Making sense of Qualitative Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996.
  • 32 Tyler ML. Homoeopathic Drug Pictures, 2nd edn. 10th impression. Saffron Walden, Essex: The C. W. Daniel Company Ltd., 1995.
  • 33 Scholten J. Homoeopathy and the Elements. Utrecht: Stichting Alonnissos, 1996.
  • 34 Asen KE, Tomson P. Family Solutions in Family Practice. Lancaster: Quay Publishing, 1992.
  • 35 Minuchin S, Rosman B, Baker L. Psychosomatische Krankheiten in der Familie. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1978.
  • 36 Morrel P. Gender in Homoeopathy. Paper presented at the Conference on The History of Unconventional Medicine. University of Linköping, Sweden, 10–12 September 1998 (www.medicinegarden.com./Homoeopathy/Gender)
  • 37 Hunter KM. Doctors’ Stories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991.
  • 38 Frank AW. The Wounded Storyteller. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995, pp 115–136.
  • 39 Propp V. Morphology of the Folktale, 2nd edn Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1958/1998.
  • 40 Konitzer M, Bahrs O. Semiotic and interactive quality and the homoeopathic concept of simile. Patient Educ Counseling 1998; 34: S69.
  • 41 Vincent C, Furnham A. Complementary Medicine. A Research Perspective. Chichester: Wiley, 1997.
  • 42 Morris DB. Illness and Culture in the Postmodern Age. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.