CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2019; 54(04): 434-439
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbo.2018.04.003
Artigo Original | Original Article
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revnter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Impacto femoroacetabular – Fatores associados à presença de lesões profundas da junção condrolabral[*]

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: português | English
1   Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital São Vicente de Paulo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brasil
,
Vinicius Adelchi Cachoeira
1   Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital São Vicente de Paulo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brasil
,
Gabriel Pozzobon Knop
1   Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital São Vicente de Paulo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brasil
,
Luiz Henrique Penteado Silva
1   Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital São Vicente de Paulo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brasil
,
Tercildo Knop
1   Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital São Vicente de Paulo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brasil
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

24. August 2017

03. April 2018

Publikationsdatum:
20. August 2019 (online)

Resumo

Objetivo Avaliar os fatores associados à presença de lesões condrais profundas (graus III e IV de Konan/Haddad) em pacientes submetidos à artroscopia do quadril para tratamento do impacto femoroacetabular (IFA).

Método Estudo transversal, prospectivo, de uma série de 125 artroscopias consecutivas do quadril feitas entre maio de 2016 e maio de 2017. Depois de aplicados os critérios de exclusão, foram analisados 107 quadris de 92 pacientes submetidos a tratamento cirúrgico do IFA dos tipos misto e CAM. Para fins de análise, os grupos foram divididos entre lesões consideradas leves e profundas, e foi feita associação com escore de sintomas, ângulo de cobertura lateral, ângulo alfa, idade, gênero, e classificação radiológica de artrose. Foram considerados como estatisticamente significativos testes com valor de probabilidade < 0,05.

Resultados Pacientes cujos quadris apresentaram lesões consideradas profundas tiveram escores de quadril não artrítico (NAHSs, na sigla em inglês) significativamente maiores do que aqueles cujos quadris apresentavam lesões consideradas leves ou não apresentavam lesão condrolabral (67,9 ± 19,4 versus 57,0 ± 21,9; p = 0,027). A prevalência de lesões profundas foi maior nos quadris Tonnis 1 do que nos que apresentaram Tonnis 0: 15 (55,6%) versus 10 (12,7%), respectivamente; p < 0,001. Homens apresentaram melhores escores funcionais e maior prevalência de lesões graus III e IV do que as mulheres: 65,6 ± 19,6 versus 49,3 ± 21,6; p < 0,001, e 23 (34,3%) versus 2 (5,0%), p = 0,001, respectivamente.

Conclusão Homens apresentaram maior prevalência de lesões profundas. Quadris Tonnis 1 tiveram um risco 4,4 vezes maior de apresentar essas lesões. Pacientes com lesões condrolabrais profundas apresentaram melhor escore funcional pré-operatório.

* Publicado originalmente por Elsevier Editora Ltda.


 
  • Referências

  • 1 Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (07) 1012-1018
  • 2 Zamber RW, Teitz CC, McGuire DA, Frost JD, Hermanson BK. Articular cartilage lesions of the knee. Arthroscopy 1989; 5 (04) 258-268
  • 3 Schairer WW, Nwachukwu BU, McCormick F, Lyman S, Mayman D. Use of hip arthroscopy and risk of conversion to total hip arthroplasty: a population-based analysis. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (04) 587-593
  • 4 Philippon MJ, Briggs KK, Yen YM, Kuppersmith DA. Outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement with associated chondrolabral dysfunction: minimum two-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (01) 16-23
  • 5 Egerton T, Hinman RS, Takla A, Bennell KL, O'Donnell J. Intraoperative cartilage degeneration predicts outcome 12 months after hip arthroscopy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (02) 593-599
  • 6 Haviv B, O'Donnell J. Arthroscopic treatment for acetabular labral tears of the hip without bony dysmorphism. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (39, Suppl) 79S-84S
  • 7 Sankar WN, Matheney TH, Zaltz I. Femoroacetabular impingement: current concepts and controversies. Orthop Clin North Am 2013; 44 (04) 575-589
  • 8 Peters CL, Erickson J. The etiology and treatment of hip pain in the young adult. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (Suppl. 04) 20-26
  • 9 Beck M, Leunig M, Parvizi J, Boutier V, Wyss D, Ganz R. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part II. Midterm results of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (418) 67-73
  • 10 Beaulé PE, Zaragoza E, Copelan N. Magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium arthrography to assess acetabular cartilage delamination. A report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86 (10) 2294-2298
  • 11 Beaulé PE, Zaragoza EJ. Surgical images: musculoskeletal acetabular cartilage delamination demonstrated by magnetic resonance arthrography: inverted “Oreo” cookie sign. Can J Surg 2003; 46 (06) 463-464
  • 12 Ho CP, Ommen ND, Bhatia S. , et al. Predictive value of 3-T magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing grade III and IV chondral lesions in the hip. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (09) 1808-1813
  • 13 Chandrasekaran S, Darwish N, Gui C, Lodhia P, Suarez-Ahedo C, Domb BG. Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy in Patients with Tönnis Grade-2 Osteoarthritis at a Mean 2-Year Follow-up: Evaluation Using a Matched-Pair Analysis with Tönnis Grade-0 and Grade-1 Cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98 (12) 973-982
  • 14 Anderson LA, Peters CL, Park BB, Stoddard GJ, Erickson JA, Crim JR. Acetabular cartilage delamination in femoroacetabular impingement. Risk factors and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (02) 305-313
  • 15 Outerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1961; 43-B: 752-757
  • 16 MacDonald AE, Bedi A, Horner NS. , et al. Indications and outcomes for microfracture as an adjunct to hip arthroscopy for treatment of chondral defects in patients with femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (01) 190-200.e2
  • 17 Amenabar T, Piriz J, Mella C, Hetaimish BM, O'Donnell J. Reliability of 3 different arthroscopic classifications for chondral damage of the acetabulum. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (08) 1492-1496
  • 18 Konan S, Rayan F, Meermans G, Witt J, Haddad FS. Validation of the classification system for acetabular chondral lesions identified at arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (03) 332-336
  • 19 Bhatia S, Nowak DD, Briggs KK, Patterson DC, Philippon MJ. Outerbridge grade IV cartilage lesions in the hip identified at arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (05) 814-819
  • 20 Del Castillo LN, Leporace G, Cardinot TM, Levy RAL, Oliveira LP. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian version of the Nonarthritic Hip Score. Sao Paulo Med J 2013; 131 (04) 244-251
  • 21 Beaulé PE, Le Duff MJ, Zaragoza E. Quality of life following femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty for femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (04) 773-779
  • 22 Nepple JJ, Carlisle JC, Nunley RM, Clohisy JC. Clinical and radiographic predictors of intra-articular hip disease in arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (02) 296-303
  • 23 Mella C, Villalón IE, Núñez Á, Paccot D, Díaz-Ledezma C. Hip arthroscopy and osteoarthritis: Where are the limits and indications?. SICOT J 2015; 1: 27
  • 24 Claßen T, Körsmeier K, Kamminga M. , et al. Is early treatment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement the key to avoiding associated full thickness isolated chondral defects?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (07) 2332-2337
  • 25 Wall PD, Fernandez M, Griffin DR, Foster NE. Nonoperative treatment for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of the literature. PM R 2013; 5 (05) 418-426
  • 26 Emara K, Samir W, Motasem H, Ghafar KA. Conservative treatment for mild femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2011; 19 (01) 41-45