Anatomy of the Scapula Applied to the Posterior Surgical Approach: Safety Parameters during Access to the Lateral Angle[*]Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: português | English
08. August 2017
21. Dezember 2017
29. Oktober 2019 (online)
Objective The objective of this paper was to identify safety parameters in the posterior surgical approach of the scapula through a cross-sectional cadaver study.
Methods Thirteen cadaver shoulders with no history of surgery or prior musculoskeletal dysfunction, with mean age, weight, and height of 70.1 years, 61.5 kg, and 1.64 m, respectively, were dissected. The anatomic landmark of the studied pathway (infraglenoid tubercle) and its distance to the axillary and suprascapular nerves were measured.
Results The mean distance between the infraglenoid tubercle (IT) and the axillary nerve (AN) was 23.8 mm, and the mean distance from the IT to the suprascapular nerve (SN) was 33.2 mm.
Conclusion The posterior approach may be considered safe through the interval between the infraspinatus and teres minor. However, caution should be taken during muscle spacing because of the short distance between the fracture site and the location of the SN and AN. These precautions help to avoid major postoperative complications.
* Study developed at the Group of Shoulder and Elbow, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Published Originally by Elsevier Editora Ltda.
- 1 Ada JR, Miller ME. Scapular fractures. Analysis of 113 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; (269) 174-180
- 2 McGahan JP, Rab GT, Dublin A. Fractures of the scapula. J Trauma 1980; 20 (10) 880-883
- 3 Thompson DA, Flynn TC, Miller PW, Fischer RP. The significance of scapular fractures. J Trauma 1985; 25 (10) 974-977
- 4 Geel CW. Scapula and clavicle. In: Colton CL, Fernandez DellO' ca A, Holz U, Kellam JF, Ochsner PE. , eds. AO principles of fracture management. New York: Thieme: Stuttgart; 2000: 261-2
- 5 Jones CB, Cornelius JP, Sietsema DL, Ringler JR, Endres TJ. Modified Judet approach and minifragment fixation of scapular body and glenoid neck fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2009; 23 (08) 558-564
- 6 Cole PA, Dubin JR, Freeman G. Operative techniques in the management of scapular fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2013; 44 (03) 331-343 , viii
- 7 Salassa TE, Hill BW, Cole PA. Quantitative comparison of exposure for the posterior Judet approach to the scapula with and without deltoid takedown. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23 (11) 1747-1752
- 8 Jerosch J, Greig M, Peuker ET, Filler TJ. The posterior subdeltoid approach: a modified access to the posterior glenohumeral joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10 (03) 265-268
- 9 Wirth MA, Butters KP, Rockwood Jr CA. The posterior deltoid-splitting approach to the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (296) 92-98
- 10 van Noort A, van Loon CJ, Rijnberg WJ. Limited posterior approach for internal fixation of a glenoid fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124 (02) 140-144
- 11 Barbieri CH, Mazzer N, Mendonça FH, Damasceno LHF. Fraturas da escápula. Rev Bras Ortop 2001; 36 (07) 245-254
- 12 Pizanis A, Tosounidis G, Braun C, Pohlemann T, Wirbel RJ. The posterior two-portal approach for reconstruction of scapula fractures: results of 39 patients. Injury 2013; 44 (11) 1630-1635
- 13 Longo UG, Forriol F, Loppini M. , et al. The safe zone for avoiding suprascapular nerve injury in bone block procedures for shoulder instability. A cadaveric study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (05) 1506-1510
- 14 Ball CM, Steger T, Galatz LM, Yamaguchi K. The posterior branch of the axillary nerve: an anatomic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85 (08) 1497-1501
- 15 Shaffer BS, Conway J, Jobe FW, Kvitne RS, Tibone JE. Infraspinatus muscle-splitting incision in posterior shoulder surgery. An anatomic and electromyographic study. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22 (01) 113-120