Quality of life predictors in patients with epilepsy and cognitive disabilities
Received: 18. November 2013
Accepted: 29. Juni 2014
04.Mai 2018 (online)
Purpose We aimed to assess the QOL and its predictors in Bulgarian patients with refractory epilepsy (RE) and cognitive problems.
Methods We conducted a study based on questionnaires designed for people with intellectual disability (the stigma scale, the Glasgow Depression Scale, the Glasgow Anxiety Scale, the Glasgow Epilepsy Outcome Scale – GEOS-35) and a purposeful interview on clinical and social factors of 64 patients (50% men) with RE and cognitive problems.
Results The mean total score of the GEOS-35 was 76 ± 2.34 (an indicator of low QOL). On univariate analysis, the GEOS-35 total score was associated with seizure frequency and severity, stigma, depression, and anxiety. On multivariate regression analysis predictors of the GEOS-35 total score were anxiety, seizure severity, and stigma Р < 0.001 (F = 14.66). Regarding the GEOS-35 subscales, on multivariate regression analysis, we found that 1. Seizure severity, seizure type, and anxiety were predictors of “concerns about seizures” Р < 0.001 (F = 8.99); 2. Anxiety was the only predictor of “concerns about treatment” Р < 0.001 (F = 7.98); 3. Anxiety and seizure severity were predictors of “concerns about caring” Р < 0.001 (F = 12.12); and 4. Seizure severity and stigma were predictors of “concerns about social impact” Р < 0.001 (F = 18.31).
Conclusions We have affirmed the low QOL in patients with RE and cognitive problems and its clinical and social determinants. The results from our study prove the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach for quality of life improvement in these patients.
- 1 Espie CA, Watkins J, Duncan R. et al. Development and validation of the Glasgow Epilepsy Outcome Scale (GEOS): a new instrument for measuring concerns about epilepsy in people with mental retardation. Epilepsia 42 2001; 1043-1051
- 2 Van Blarikom W, Tan IY, Aldenkamp AP, Van Gennep AT. Epilepsy, intellectual disability, and living environment: a critical review. Epilepsy Behav 9 2006; 14-18
- 3 Gil R. Neuropsychologie. L’examen neuropsychologique. 2006. Masson; Paris: 12-16
- 4 Cuthill F, Espie C, Cooper S-A. Development and psychometric properties of the Glasgow Depression Scale for people with a Learning Disability. Br J Psychiatry 182 2003; 347-353
- 5 Mindham J, Espie CA. Glasgow Anxiety Scale for people with an Intellectual Disability (GAS-ID): development and psychometric properties of a new measure for use with people with mild intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res 47 2003; 22-30
- 6 Ali A, Strydom A, Hassiotis A, Williams R, King M. A measure of perceived stigma in people with intellectual disability. Br J Psychiatry 193 2008; 410-415
- 7 Baker GA, Smith DF, Dewey ME, Jacoby A, Chadwick DW. The initial development of a health-related quality of life model as an outcome measure in epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 16 1993; 65-81
- 8 Ventegodt S, Omar H, Struve F, Nielsen T, Kandel I, Merrick J. Quality of life and persons with intellectual disability: can we measure QOL in this population?. J Altern Med Res 2 2010; 459-471
- 9 Kerr MP, Turky A, Huber B. The psychosocial impact of epilepsy in adults with an intellectual disability. Epilepsy Behav 5 2009; S26-S30
- 10 Sabaz M, Cairns DR, Lawson JA, Bleasel AF, Bye AM. The health-related quality of life of children with refractory epilepsy: a comparison of those with and without intellectual disability. Epilepsia 42 2001; 621-628
- 11 Endermann M. Predictors of health-related and global quality of life among young adults with difficult-to-treat epilepsy and mild intellectual disability. Epilepsy Behav 26 2013; 188-195
- 12 Endermann M. Quality of life among people with epilepsy and mild intellectual disabilities in residential care. Epilepsy Behav 8 2006; 703-712