Homeopathy 2015; 104(04): 328-332
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2015.05.003
Original Paper
Copyright © The Faculty of Homeopathy 2015

Controlled clinical studies of homeopathy

Robert T Mathie
Further Information

Publication History

Received27 February 2015
revised12 May 2015

accepted20 May 2015

Publication Date:
28 December 2017 (online)

Introduction: Observations about controlled clinical trials expressed by Max Haidvogl in the book Ultra High Dilution (1994) have been appraised from a perspective two decades later. The present commentary briefly examines changes in homeopathy research evidence since 1994 as regards: the published number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), the use of individualised homeopathic intervention, the ‘proven efficacy of homeopathy’, and the quality of the evidence.

Methods: The commentary reflects the details of RCTs that are available in a recently published literature review and by scrutiny of systematic reviews of RCTs in homeopathy.

Results: The homeopathy RCT literature grew by 309 records in the 18 years that immediately followed Haidvogl’s article, with more than a doubling of the proportion that investigated individualised homeopathy. Discounting one prior publication, the entire systematic review literature on homeopathy RCTs post-dates 1994. A total of 36 condition-specific systematic reviews have been identified in the peer-reviewed literature: 16 of them reported positive, or tentatively positive, conclusions about homeopathy’s clinical effectiveness; the other 20 were negative or non-conclusive. Reviews typically have been restricted in the strength of their conclusions by the low quality of the original RCT evidence. Three comprehensive systematic reviews concluded, cautiously, that homeopathy may differ from placebo; a fourth such review reached negative conclusions. A recent high-quality meta-analysis concluded that medicines prescribed in individualised homeopathic treatment may have small, specific, effects.

Conclusions: Despite important growth in research activity since 1994, concerns about study quality limit the interpretation of available RCT data. The question whether homeopathic intervention differs from placebo awaits decisive answer.

  • References

  • 1 Haidvogl M. Clinical studies of homeopathy. The problem of a useful design. In: Endler P.C., Schulte J. (eds). Ultra High Dilution: Physiology and Physics. 1994. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; pp 121-128.
  • 2 Kleijnen J., Knipschild P., ter Riet G. Clinical trials of homoeopathy. Br Med J 1991; 302: 316-323.
  • 3 Mathie R.T., Hacke D., Clausen J., Nicolai T., Riley D.S., Fisher P. Randomised controlled trials of homeopathy in humans: characterising the research journal literature for systematic review. Homeopathy 2013; 102: 3-24.
  • 4 Faculty of Homeopathy. Systematic reviews of RCTs in homeopathy. http://www.facultyofhomeopathy.org/research/systematic-reviews-of-rcts-in-homeopathy/ (Accessed, 24 July 2014).
  • 5 Mathie R.T. Clinical research evidence in homeopathy. In: McCarthy P.W., Langweiler M. (eds). Methodologies for Effectively Assessing Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM): Research Tools and Techniques. 2015. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; pp 116-131.
  • 6 Mathie R.T., Legg L.A., Clausen J., Davidson J.R.T., Lloyd S.M., Ford I. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, placebo-controlled, trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: study protocol. Version 1.0, 25 January 2013. (Accessed, 24 July 2014) http://www.britishhomeopathic.org/our-systematic-review-programme/.
  • 7 Mathie R.T., Lloyd S.M., Legg L.A. et al. Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2014; 3: 142.
  • 8 McCarney R., Warner J., Fisher P., van Haselen R. Homeopathy for dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; CD003803.
  • 9 Smith C.A. Homoeopathy for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; CD003399.
  • 10 McCarney R.W., Linde K., Lasserson T.J. Homeopathy for chronic asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; CD000353.
  • 11 Coulter M.K., Dean M.E. Homeopathy for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder or hyperkinetic disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; CD005648.
  • 12 Kassab S., Cummings M., Berkovitz S., van Haselen R., Fisher P. Homeopathic medicines for adverse effects of cancer treatments. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; CD004845.
  • 13 Mathie R.T., Frye J., Fisher P. Homeopathic Oscillococcinum® for preventing and treating influenza and influenza-like illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; CD001957.
  • 14 Peckham E.J., Nelson E.A., Greenhalgh J., Cooper K., Roberts E.R., Agrawal A. Homeopathy for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; CD009710.
  • 15 Boissel J.P., Cucherat M., Haugh M., Gauthier E. Critical literature review on the effectiveness of homoeopathy: overview of data from homoeopathic medicine trials. Homoeopathic Medicine Research Group, Report of the Commission of the European Communities, Directorate-General XII – Science, Research and Development, Directorate E – RTD Actions: Life Sciences and Technologies – Medical Research. Brussels 1996.
  • 16 Linde K., Clausius N., Ramirez G. et al. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Lancet 1997; 350: 834-843.
  • 17 Cucherat M., Haugh M.C., Gooch M., Boissel J.P. Evidence of clinical efficacy of homeopathy – A meta-analysis of clinical trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 56: 27-33.
  • 18 Linde K., Scholz M., Ramirez G., Clausius N., Melchart D., Jonas W.B. Impact of study quality on outcome in placebo controlled trials of homeopathy. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52: 631-636.
  • 19 Shang A., Huwiler-Muntener K., Nartey L. et al. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. Lancet 2005; 366: 726-732.
  • 20 Linde K., Melchart D. Randomized controlled trials of individualized homeopathy: a state-of-the-art review. J Altern Complement Med 1998; 4: 371-388.
  • 21 National Health and Medical Research Council. Effectiveness of homeopathy for health conditions: evaluation of the evidence. Overview Report. 10 March 2015. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/cam02 (Accessed, 30 April 2015).
  • 22 Mathie R.T. There is some evidence that individualised homeopathic intervention is more effective than placebo, report could have concluded. Br Med J 2015; 350: h1478.
  • 23 Roberts E.R., Baumgartner S., Mathie R.T., Relton C., Thompson E., Tournier A. HRI Barcelona 2013: inaugural conference brings homeopathy research into the spotlight. Homeopathy 2014; 103: 58-61.
  • 24 Jacobs J., Jonas W.B., Jimenez-Perez M., Crothers D. Homeopathy for childhood diarrhea: combined results and metaanalysis from three randomized, controlled clinical trials. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003; 22: 229-234.
  • 25 Schneider B., Klein P., Weiser M. Treatment of vertigo with a homeopathic complex remedy compared with usual treatments: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. Arzneimittelforschung 2005; 55: 23-29.
  • 26 Taylor M.A., Reilly D., Llewellyn-Jones R.H., McSharry C., Aitchison T.C. Randomised controlled trials of homoeopathy versus placebo in perennial allergic rhinitis with overview of four trial series. Br Med J 2000; 321: 471-476.
  • 27 Bellavite P., Ortolani R., Pontarollo F., Piasere V., Benato G., Conforti A. Immunology and homeopathy. 4. Clinical studies – Part 1. eCAM 2006; 3: 293-301.
  • 28 Bellavite P., Ortolani R., Pontarollo F., Piasere V., Benato G., Conforti A. Immunology and homeopathy. 4. Clinical studies – Part 2. eCAM 2006; 3: 397-409.
  • 29 Bornhöft G., Wolf U., von Ammon K. et al. Effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of homeopathy in general practice – summarized health technology assessment. Forsch Komplementmed 2006; 13 (02) 19-29.
  • 30 Davidson J.R., Crawford C., Ives J.A., Jonas W.B. Homeopathic treatments in psychiatry: a systematic review of randomized placebo-controlled studies. J Clin Psychiatry 2011; 72: 795-805.
  • 31 Iannitti T., Morales-Medina J.C., Bellavite P., Rottigni V., Palmieri B. Effectiveness and safety of Arnica montana in post-surgical setting, pain and inflammation. Am J Ther 2014; Sep 17 [Epub ahead of print].
  • 32 Jonas W.B., Linde K., Ramirez G. Homeopathy and rheumatic disease. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2000; 26: 117-123.
  • 33 Barnes J., Resch K.-L., Ernst E. Homeopathy for postoperative ileus? A meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 1997; 25: 628-633.
  • 34 Ernst E. Homeopathic Galphimia glauca for hay fever: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials and a critique of a published meta-analysis. FACT 2011; 16: 200-203.
  • 35 Boehm K., Raak C., Cramer H., Lauche R., Ostermann T. Homeopathy in the treatment of fibromyalgia – a comprehensive literature-review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Med 2014; 22: 731-742.
  • 36 Perry R., Terry R., Ernst E. A systematic review of homoeopathy for the treatment of fibromyalgia. Clin Rheumatol 2010; 29: 457-464.
  • 37 Wiesenauer M., Lüdtke R. A meta-analysis of the homeopathic treatment of pollinosis with Galphimia glauca . Forsch Komplementmed 1996; 3: 230-236.
  • 38 Lüdtke R., Hacke D. On the effectiveness of the homeopathic remedy Arnica montana . Wien Med Wochenschr 2005; 155: 482-490.
  • 39 Long L., Ernst E. Homeopathic remedies for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Br Homeopath J 2001; 90: 37-43.
  • 40 Owen J.M., Green B.N. Homeopathic treatment of headaches: a systematic review of the literature. J Chiropract Med 2004; 3: 45-52.
  • 41 Pilkington K., Kirkwood G., Rampes H., Fisher P., Richardson J. Homeopathy for depression: a systematic review of the research evidence. Homeopathy 2005; 94: 153-163.
  • 42 Pilkington K., Kirkwood G., Rampes H., Fisher P., Richardson J. Homeopathy for anxiety and anxiety disorders: a systematic review of the research. Homeopathy 2006; 95: 151-162.
  • 43 Saha S., Koley M., Medhurst R. A meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials of individualized homeopathy in rheumatoid arthritis. World J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci 2013; 2: 2097-2117.
  • 44 Altunç U., Pittler M.H., Ernst E. Homeopathy for childhood and adolescence ailments: systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Mayo Clin Proc 2007; 82: 69-75.
  • 45 Milazzo S., Russell N., Ernst E. Efficacy of homeopathic therapy in cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42: 282-289.
  • 46 Simonart T., Kabagabo C., De Maertelaer V. Homoeopathic remedies in dermatology: a systematic review of controlled clinical trials. Br J Dermatol 2011; 165: 897-905.
  • 47 Ernst E., Pittler M.H. Efficacy of homeopathic arnica. A systematic review of placebo-controlled clinical trials. Arch Surg 1998; 133: 1187-1190.
  • 48 Cooper K.L., Relton C. Homeopathy for insomnia: a systematic review of research evidence. Sleep Med Rev 2010; 14: 329-337.
  • 49 Ernst E. Homeopathic prophylaxis of headaches and migraine? A systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage 1999; 18: 353-357.
  • 50 Ernst E. Homeopathy for insomnia and sleep-related disorders: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. FACT 2011; 16: 195-199.
  • 51 Ernst E. Homeopathy for eczema: a systematic review of controlled clinical trials. Br J Dermatol 2012; 166: 1170-1172.
  • 52 Ernst E., Barnes J. Are homoeopathic remedies effective for delayed-onset muscle soreness? – A systematic review of placebo-controlled trials. Perfusion 1998; 11: 4-8.