Homeopathy 2012; 101(01): 5-12
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2011.08.003
Original Paper
Copyright © The Faculty of Homeopathy 2011

Randomized controlled pilot study to compare Homeopathy and Conventional therapy in Acute Otitis Media

M.N. Sinha
2   Regional Research Institute of Homeopathy, Jaipur (Rajasthan), India
,
V.A. Siddiqui
1   Central Council for Research in Homeopathy Headquarters, New Delhi, India
,
C. Nayak
1   Central Council for Research in Homeopathy Headquarters, New Delhi, India
,
Vikram Singh
1   Central Council for Research in Homeopathy Headquarters, New Delhi, India
,
Rupali Dixit
1   Central Council for Research in Homeopathy Headquarters, New Delhi, India
,
Deepti Dewan
2   Regional Research Institute of Homeopathy, Jaipur (Rajasthan), India
,
Alok Mishra
1   Central Council for Research in Homeopathy Headquarters, New Delhi, India
› Author Affiliations

Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

Received01 February 2011
revised07 July 2011

accepted15 August 2011

Publication Date:
21 December 2017 (online)

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of Homeopathy and Conventional therapy in Acute Otitis Media (AOM).

Method: A randomized placebo-controlled parallel group pilot study of homeopathic vs conventional treatment for AOM was conducted in Jaipur, India. Patients were randomized by a computer generated random number list to receive either individualized homeopathic medicines in fifty millesimal (LM) potencies, or conventional treatment including analgesics, antipyretics and anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients who did not improve were prescribed antibiotics at the 3rd day. Outcomes were assessed by the Acute Otitis Media-Severity of Symptoms (AOM-SOS) Scale and Tympanic Membrane Examination over 21 days.

Results: 81 patients were included, 80 completed follow-up: 41 for conventional and 40 for homeopathic treatment. In the Conventional group, all 40 (100%) patients were cured, in the Homeopathy group, 38 (95%) patients were cured while 02 (5%) patients were lost to the last two follow-up. By the 3rd day of treatment, 4 patients were cured in Homeopathy group but in Conventional group only one patient was cured. In the Conventional group antibiotics were prescribed in 39 (97.5%), no antibiotics were required in the Homeopathy group. 85% of patients were prescribed six homeopathic medicines.

Conclusion: Individualized homeopathy is an effective conventional treatment in AOM, there were no significant differences between groups in the main outcome. Symptomatic improvement was quicker in the Homeopathy group, and there was a large difference in antibiotic requirements, favouring homeopathy. Further work on a larger scale should be conducted.

 
  • References

  • 1 National Institute of Deafness & other Communication Disorders. Ear infections in children; what causes ear infection: para - 01st, http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/hearing/ear%20infections.
  • 2 Corbeel Lucien. What is new in otitis media?. Eur J Pediatr 2007; 166: 511-519.
  • 3 O’Neill Paddy. Clinical evidence – acute otitis media. BMJ 1999; 319: 833 (Published 25 September 1999); [assessed on 01.09.10].
  • 4 Davidson Hunter, John A.A. Principles and practice of medicine. 19th edn. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingston; 2002. p. 566.
  • 5 Noverr M.C., Noggle R.M., Toews G.B., Huffnagle G.B. Role of antibiotics and fungal microbiota in driving pulmonary allergic responses. Infect Immun 2004; 72: 4996-5003.
  • 6 Biswas A.C., Joarder A.H., Siddique B.H. Prevalence of CSOM among rural school going children. Mymensingh Med J 2005 Jul; 14 (02) 152-155.
  • 7 Harrison H., Fixsen A., Vickers A. A randomized comparison of homoeopathic and standard care for the treatment of glue ear in children. Complement Ther Med 1999 Sep; 7 (03) 132-135.
  • 8 Witco David. CARA Professional. London: Miccant Ltd; 1997. Revised Programme by John Stevenson 1999.
  • 9 American academy of pediatrics and American academy of family physicians. Diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Pediatrics May 2004; 113: No. 05.
  • 10 Shaikh N., Hoberman A., Paradise J.L. et al. Development and preliminary evaluation of a parent-report outcome instrument for clinical trials in acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2009; 28: 5-12.
  • 11 Hahnemann S. Organon of medicine. Reprint 5th & 6th edn. New Delhi: B. Jain Publishers (P) Ltd.; 1994.
  • 12 Kent J.T. Lectures on homoeopathic philosophy. Reprint 4th edn. New Delhi: B. Jain Publishers (P) Ltd.; 1997.
  • 13 Boericke W. New manual of homoeopathic Materia Medica and repertory with relationship of remedies. New Delhi: B. Jain Publishers Pvt. Ltd.; 1998. First Corrected, Revised and updated Edition.
  • 14 Jacobs J., Springer D.A. Homoeopathic treatment of acute otitis media in children: a preliminary randomized placebo-controlled trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001; 20: 177-183.
  • 15 Barnett E.D. Challenges of evaluating homoeopathic treatment of acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000; 19: 271-275.
  • 16 Friese K.H., Kruse S., Ludtke R., Moeller H. The homoeopathic treatment of otitis media in children - comparisons with conventional therapy. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 1997 Jul; 35 (07) 296-301.
  • 17 Frei H., Thurneysen A. Homeopathy in acute otitis media in children: treatment effect or spontaneous resolution?. Br Hom J 2001; 90: 180-182.
  • 18 Pichichero M.E., Casey J.R. Systematic review of factors contributing to penicillin treatment failure in Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 137: 851-857.
  • 19 Natalia B., Roger A.M.J., Arno W. Hoes, Anne G.M., Maroeska M.R. Recurrence up to 3.5 years after antibiotic treatment of acute otitis media in very young Dutch children: survey of trial participants. BMJ 2009; 338: b2525 http://www.bmj.com/content/338/bmj.b2525.full?view=long&pmid=19567910.