Homeopathy 2010; 99(04): 263-270
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2010.08.001
Research Review
Copyright © The Faculty of Homeopathy 2010

Infection models in basic research on homeopathy

Jürgen Clausen
1   Karl und Veronica Carstens-Stiftung, Am Deimelsberg 36, 45276 Essen, Germany
,
Roeland van Wijk
2   Faculty of Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584CH Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Henning Albrecht
1   Karl und Veronica Carstens-Stiftung, Am Deimelsberg 36, 45276 Essen, Germany
› Author Affiliations

Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

Received01 December 2009
revised27 July 2010

accepted23 August 2010

Publication Date:
17 December 2017 (online)

Introduction: The objective of this study was to search for effective agents for the treatment of infections in animals or infected cell lines.

Methods: The Homeopathic Basic Research experiments (HomBRex) database (http://www.carstens-stiftung.de/hombrex) on model biological systems in homeopathic research was searched. Eligible experiments were reviewed and analysed.

Results: The database contains 48 eligible experiments published from 1832 to 2009. Causative pathogens were bacteria, fungi, viruses, proto- and metazoa. In the experiments, various parameters were observed and a large set of medicines was investigated. In eight of the 48 experiments, at least one of the investigated medicines was selected according to the similia principle. Nosodes and homeopathic complexes were investigated in 8 and 14 experiments respectively. Mice were the most often used host organisms (13 experiments). In 31 experiments at least one homeopathic medicine was found effective for treatment.

Conclusion: The results of basic research experiments may invigorate new clinical trials that investigate complementary treatments for infectious diseases. However, all experiments reviewed here await replication and no clear-cut conclusion can be drawn regarding the transferability of in vitro results to in vivo outcomes.

 
  • References

  • 1 Albrecht H., Van Wijk R., Dittloff S. A new database on basic research in homeopathy. Homeopathy 2002; 91 (03) 162-165.
  • 2 Van Wijk R., Albrecht H. Proving and therapeutic experiments in the HomBRex basic homeopathy research database. Homeopathy 2007; 96 (04) 252-257.
  • 3 Van Wijk R., Albrecht H. Classification of systems and methods used in biological basic research on homeopathy. Homeopathy 2007; 96 (04) 247-251.
  • 4 Van Wijk R., Clausen J., Albrecht H. The rat in basic therapeutic research in homeopathy. Homeopathy 2009; 98 (04) 280-286.
  • 5 Taburet A.M., Singlas E. Drug interactions with antiviral drugs. Clin Pharm 1996; 30 (05) 385-401.
  • 6 Ribeiro I.R., Olliaro P. Safety of artemisinin and its derivatives. A review of published and unpublished clinical trials. Med Trop (Mars) 1998; 58 (3 Suppl): 50-53.
  • 7 Dancer S.J. How antibiotics can make us sick: the less obvious adverse effects of antimicrobial chemotherapy. Lancet Infect Dis 2004; 4 (10) 611-619.
  • 8 Pasqualotto A.C., Denning D.W. New and emerging treatments for fungal infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008; 61 (Suppl. 01) i19-i30.
  • 9 Granowitz E.V., Brown R.B. Antibiotic adverse reactions and drug interactions. Crit Care Clin 2008; 24 (02) 421–442, xi.
  • 10 Betti L., Trebbi G., Nani D. et al. Models with plants, microorganisms and viruses for basic research in homeopathy. In: Bonamin L.V. Signals and Images. 1st edn. 2008. New York: Springer; 97-111 Chap 7.
  • 11 Jenaer M., Gengoux P., Karelle-Bui Thi H. Controle de prevention de la leucemie spontanee chez la souris AKR, par ADN-RNA dynamises. Rev Belg Hom 1978; 10 (01) 293-299.
  • 12 Jonas W.B. Do homeopathic nosodes protect against infection? An experimental test. Altern Ther Health Med 1999; 5 (05) 36-40.
  • 13 Lira-Salazar G., Marines-Montiel E., Torres-Monzon J., Hernandez-Hernandez F., Salas-Benito J.S. Effects of homeopathic medications Eupatorium perfoliatum and Arsenicum album on parasitemia of Plasmodium berghei-infected mice. Homeopathy 2006; 95 (04) 223-228.
  • 14 Sukul N.C., Gosh S., Sinhababu S.P. Reduction in the number of infective Trichinella spiralis larvae in mice by use of homeopathic drugs. Forsch Komplement Med 2005; 12 (04) 202-205.
  • 15 Pontin K. Determinacao da atividade biologica de bioterapico extrato de propolis “in vitro” na infeccao experimental determinada por Leishmania (vianna) braziliensis. Thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2003.
  • 16 Sandoval C.H., Morfin L.L., Lopez B.B. Preliminary research for testing Baptisia tinctoria 30c effectiveness against salmonellosis in first and second quality broiler chickens. Br Homeopath J 1998; 87 (03) 131-134.
  • 17 Velkers F.C., te Loo A.J.H., Madin F., van Eck J.H.H. Isopathic and pluralist homeopathic treatment of commercial broilers with experimentally induced colibacillosis. Res Vet Sci 2005; 78 (01) 77-83.
  • 18 Gupta G., Singh L.M. Virus chemotherapy through homeopathic drugs: a new approach. Br Hom Res Group Commun 1985; 14: 30-35.
  • 19 Singh L.M., Gupta G. Antiviral efficacy of homeopathic drugs against animal viruses. Br Homeopath J 1985; 74 (03) 168-174.
  • 20 Singh L.M., Gupta G. Homoepathic drugs: a potential inhibitor of animal viruses. Hahnemann Gleanings 1985; 52: 361-367.
  • 21 Baranger P., Filer M.K. Contribution a l’etude des facteurs physiques pouvant influer sur l’efficacite therapeutiques des hautes dilutions de Geraniol. Ann Homeopath Fra 1971; 13 (07) 561-569.
  • 22 Sukul N.C., Sarkar P., Sukul A., Sinhababu S.P. Antifilarial effect of Artemisia nilagirica extract and its ultra high dilutions against canine dirofilariasis. Jpn J Trop Med Hyg 1999; 27 (04) 477-481.
  • 23 Jeannes A., Tetau M., Fouche L. Experimentation pharmacologique de la folliculo-stimuline hypophysaire FSH diluée et dynamisée. Ann Homeop Franc 1972; 14 (04) 311-328.
  • 24 Cabaret J. The homeopathic cina does not reduce the egg output of digestive-tract nematodes in lambs. Rev Méd Vét 1996; 147 (06) 445-446.
  • 25 Do Brasil Almeida LA. Avaliacao do tratamento alopatico e homeopatico de mastite bovina em animais inoculados com Staphylococcus aureus. Thesis, Universidade de Sao Paulo, 2004.
  • 26 Schoop G., Stolz A. Behandlungsversuche mit Lachesis Bengen bei Pararauschbrand und Novödem. Dtsch Tierärztl Wochenschr 1940; 48: 108-110.
  • 27 Singh N., Srivastava V.K., Kohli R.P. An experimental appraisal of the anti-viral activity of variolinum – a homeopathic remedy. J Res Ind Med 1971; 6: 242-244.
  • 28 Metelmann H., Glatthaar-Saalmüller B. Die antivirale Wirkung von Euphorbium compositum S. Biol Med 1999; 28 (03) 142-146.
  • 29 Glatthaar-Saalmüller B., Fallier-Becker P. Antiviral action of Euphorbium compositum(R) and its components. Forsch Komplement Med 2001; 8 (04) 207-212.
  • 30 Oberbaum M., Glatthaar-Saalmüller B., Stolt P., Weiser M. Antiviral activity of Engystol: an in vitro analysis. J Altern Complement Med 2005; 11 (05) 855-862.
  • 31 Glatthaar-Saalmüller B. In vitro evaluation of the antiviral effects of the homeopathic preparation Gripp-Heel on selected respiratory viruses. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2007; 85 (11) 1084-1090.
  • 32 Cleff-Menne C., Kirch H.C. Molekularbiologische Untersuchung von Adeno-12-Virusnosoden. ÄfN 2000; 41 (06) 341-346.
  • 33 See D.M., Tiles J.G., Hirschmann J., Bertacchini C. Immunomodulatory effects of a homeopathic agent. Am J Nat Med 1998; 5 (06) 1-6.
  • 34 Wagner H., Jurcic K., Doenicke A., Rosenhuber E., Behrens N. Effect of homeopathic drugs on the phagocytic activity of human granulocytes. In vitro tests in a controlled single-blind study. Arzneimittelforschung 1986; 36 (09) 1421-1425.
  • 35 Enbergs H. Effects of the homeopathic preparation Engystol on interferon-gamma production by human T-lymphocytes. Immunol Invest 2006; 35 (01) 19-27.
  • 36 Torbicka E., Brzozowska-Binda A., Wilczynski J., Uzarowicz A. RS-Virusinfektionen bei Säuglingen: Therapie mit einem Homöopathikum. Biol Med 1998; 27 (02) 71-76.
  • 37 Fimiani V., Cavallaro A., Ainis O., Bottari C. Immunomodulatory effect of the homoeopathic drug Engystol-N on some activities of isolated human leukocytes and in whole blood. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 2000; 22 (01) 103-115.
  • 38 Denys A., Siewierska K. Efficacy of preoperative immunoprophylaxis in patients with neoplastic diseases. II. Estimation of antihaemagglutinin and antineuraminidase antibody titre of influenza viruses A and B. Int Rev Allergol Clin Immunol 1999; 5 (01) 46-50.
  • 39 Siewierska K., Denys A. Efficacy of preoperative immunoprophylaxis in patients with neoplastic diseases. I. Phagocyte activity and bactericidal properties of peripheral blood granulocytes. Int Rev Allergol Clin Immunol 1999; 5 (01) 39-45.
  • 40 Schütte A. Ist Forschung in der Veterinärhomöopathie gerechtfertigt?. Berl Münch Tierärztl Wochenschr 1994; 107 (07) 229-236.
  • 41 King G. Veterinärhomöopathie – Einführung und Materia medica. Hannover: Schlütersche Verlagsanstalt und Druckerei; 1992. 1–232.
  • 42 Löscher W. Homöopathie – Eine wirksame und risikoarme Alternative zur konventionellen Pharmakotherapie? Teil 2: Nachweis der Wirksamkeit beim Tier. Dtsch Tierärztl Wochenschr 1992; 99 (03) 85-124.
  • 43 Schütte A. Homöopathie in der Tiermedizin. Lohmann Information 2002; 2002 (02) 25-31.
  • 44 Jonas W.B., Dillner D.K. Protection of mice from Tularemia infection with ultra-low, serial agitated dilutions prepared from Francisella tularensis-infected tissue. J Sci Exploration 2000; 14 (01) 35-52.
  • 45 Turco Nasi M.T., Domingues Ribeiro R., Lopes R.A. Emploi de biotherapiques dans le traitement de souris infectees par trypanosoma cruzi resultats preliminaires. Ann Homeop Franc 1982; 24 (03) 53-64.
  • 46 Oberbaum M., Weismann Z., Bentwich Z. Treatment of experimentally-induced AIDS in mice by very high dilutions of virus: a preliminary study. In: Bastide M., Campbell A., Halm R.P., Narcisse G. Signals and Images. Abstracts—Book of the 3rd GIRI Symposium. 1989. Paris: Atelier Alpha Blue; 127-129.
  • 47 Rabe A., Weiser M., Klein P. Effectiveness and tolerability of a homoeopathic remedy compared with conventional therapy for mild viral infections. Int J Clin Pract 2004; 58 (09) 827-832.
  • 48 Maiwald L., Weinfurtner T., Mau J., Connert W.D. Therapy of common cold with a homeopathic combination preparation in comparison with acetylsalicylic acid. A controlled, randomized double-blind study. Arzneimittelforschung 1988; 38 (04) 578-582.
  • 49 Schmiedel V., Klein P. A complex homeopathic preparation for the symptomatic treatment of upper respiratory infections associated with the common cold: an observational study. Explore (NY) 2006; 2 (02) 109-114.
  • 50 Heilmann A. Ein injizierbares Kombinationspräparat (Engystol N) als Prophylaktikum des grippalen Infekts. Biol Med 1992; 21 (03) 225-229.
  • 51 Tiraspolski I.V., Kuzmin V.N., Kashirina T.N., Busorgina O.V. Antihomotoxische Therapie primärer Zytomegalie-Virusinfektionen bei Schwangeren. Biol Med 1998; 27 (05) 206-211.
  • 52 Herzberger G., Weiser M. Homöopathische Behandlung von Infekten unterschiedlicher Genese – eine Anwendungsbeobachtung. Biol Med 1997; 26 (02) 73-77.
  • 53 Ammerschlager H., Klein P., Weiser M., Oberbaum M. Treatment of inflammatory diseases of the upper respiratory tract – comparison of a homeopathic complex remedy with xylometazoline. Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd 2005; 12 (01) 24-31.
  • 54 Weiser M., Clasen B.P.E. Randomisierte plazebokontrollierte Doppelblindstudie zur Untersuchung der klinischen Wirksamkeit der homöopathischen Euphorbium compositum-Nasentropfen S bei chronischer Sinusitis. Forsch Komplementärmed Klass Naturheilkd 1994; 1 (06) 251-259.
  • 55 Metelmann H., Zenner S. Empirical data on therapy with a homeopathic nasal spray. Biomed Ther 2009; 15 (03) 82-88.
  • 56 Klein W. Experience in utilizing Euphorbium Compositum nasal spray in the ENT practice. Biol Ther 1991; 9 (02) 1-3.
  • 57 Rabe A. A comparison of homeopathic and conventional therapies. Der Allgemeinarzt 2003; 25 (20) 1522-1529.
  • 58 Louros N., Scheyer H.E. Über eine bisher unbekannte Wirkung der Sekalepräparate. Zentralbl Gynäkol 1927; 12: 763-768.