Homeopathy 2007; 96(04): 273-278
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2007.08.001
Debate
Copyright © The Faculty of Homeopathy 2007

Systematic review of homeopathic pathogenetic trials: an excess of rigour?

Jeremy Sherr
,
Tina Quirk

Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

Received13 April 2007

accepted16 August 2007

Publication Date:
21 December 2017 (online)

 
  • References

  • 1 Dantas F. et al. A systematic review of the quality of homeopathic pathogenetic trials published from 1945 to 1995. Homeopathy 2007; 96: 4-16.
  • 2 Signorini A. Guest Editorial. Finally, some light on the pillar of homeopathy. Homeopathy 2007; 96: 1-2.
  • 3 Sherr J. The Homeopathic Proving of Hydrogen. West Malvern: Dynamis School; 1992.
  • 4 Schroyens F, Cecchi M, Saetonne MF, et al. Homeopathic proving of hydrogen. Proceedings of 54th International, Congress of LMHI, Milan, 1996.
  • 5 Hahnemann S. Organon of Medicine, 6th edn. New Dehli: B Jain Publishers, 1992.
  • 6 Hughes R., Dake J.P. New Delhi: B Jain Publishers; A Cyclopaedia of Drug Pathogenesy. 4 volumes. 1979.
  • 7 Kent J.T. New Remedies, Clinical Cases, Lesser Writings. New Delhi: B Jain Publishers; 1987.
  • 8 Walach H., Sherr J., Schneider R., Shabi R., Bond A., Rieberer G. Homeopathic proving symptoms: result of a local, nonlocal, or placebo process? A blinded, placebo-controlled pilot study. Homeopathy 2004; 93: 179-185.
  • 9 Walach H, Möllinger H, Sherr J, Schneider R. Homoeopathic pathogenetic trials produced more specific than non-specific symptoms: results from two double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled pathogenetic trials, submitted manuscript.