Homeopathy 2007; 96(02): 95-101
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2007.03.001
Original Paper
Copyright © The Faculty of Homeopathy 2007

In vivo study of the anti-inflammatory effect of Rhus toxicodendron

A.L. dos Santos
1   Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde de São Paulo, R. Bartolomeu de Gusmão, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
,
F.F. Perazzo
2   Laboratório de Pesquisa em Fármacos, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Amapá, Rod. JK, km 02, CEP 68902-303, Macapá-AP, Brazil
,
L.G.V. Cardoso
2   Laboratório de Pesquisa em Fármacos, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Amapá, Rod. JK, km 02, CEP 68902-303, Macapá-AP, Brazil
,
J.C.T. Carvalho
2   Laboratório de Pesquisa em Fármacos, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Amapá, Rod. JK, km 02, CEP 68902-303, Macapá-AP, Brazil
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received12. November 2006
revised02. Februar 2007

Publikationsdatum:
13. Dezember 2017 (online)

Background Homeopathic Rhus toxicodendron (Rhus tox) is used in various inflammatory conditions. We screened its effect compared to succussed ethanol controls and appropriate active controls.

Method We initially experimented with Rhus tox 6, 12, 30 and 200 cH, using carrageenan-induced paw oedema in rats. The 6 cH dilution appeared most effective and was used in subsequent assays. We used pre-treatment and single treatment regimes in Wistar rats, and mice.

Results We found significant reductions compared to control in carrageenan-induced paw oedema, vascular permeability, writhing induced by intraperitoneal acetic acid and stress induced gastric lesions.

Conclusions Rhus tox in homeopathic dilution appears to interfere with inflammatory processes involving histamine, prostaglandins and other inflammatory mediators.

 
  • References

  • 1 Bharatan V., Humphries C., Barnett J.R. Plant Names in Homeopathy. London: Natural History Museum; 2002.
  • 2 Lathoud JA. Estudo de matéria médica homeopática, Ed. Organom, 2001, pp 931–932.
  • 3 E.M.C. Rhus toxicodendron. Encyclopédie Médico-Chirurgicale (Paris) 1994; 38: 780.
  • 4 Christensen HE. The Toxic Substances List, US Department of Health Education and Welfare, USA, 1974.
  • 5 Choi D.J., Yoon T.J., Kim T.H. Systemic Photochemotherapy on the Systemic Contact Dermatitis by Rhus. Korean Journal of Dermatology 2002; 40 (04) 393-398.
  • 6 Ferreira S.H., Vane J.R. Mode of action of anti-inflammatory agents which are prostaglandin syntetase inhibitors. Vane J.R., Ferreira S.H. Anti-inflammatory Drugs. 1979. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 348-398
  • 7 Tubaro A., Dri P., Delbello G., Zilli C., Della Loggia R. The croton oil ear test revisited. Agents and Actions 1985; 17: 347-349.
  • 8 Lykbe A.M.J., Cummings R. Inflammation in healing. 1. Time-course and medition of exudation in wound healing in the rat. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 1969; 50: 309-318.
  • 9 Koster R., Anderson M., Beer E.J. Acetic acid for analgesic screening. Federation Proceedings 1959; 18: 412.
  • 10 Takagi K., Kasuya Y., Watanabe K. Studies on the drugs for peptic ulcer. A reliable method for producing stress ulcer in rats. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 1964; 12: 465-472.
  • 11 Takagi K., Okabe S. The effects of drugs on the production and recovery processes of the stress ulcer. Japanese Journal of Pharmacology 1968; 18: 9-18.
  • 12 Basile A.C., Sertié J.A.A., Panizza S., Oshiro T.T., Azzolini C.A. Pharmacological assay of Casearia sylvestris. I: preventive anti-ulcer activity and toxicity of the leaf crude extract. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 1990; 30: 185-197.
  • 13 Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, second edn. Campbell: Freeman, 1995. pp 175–205; 404–486.
  • 14 Santos F., Rao V. Inflammatory oedema induced by 1,8-cineole in the hindpaw of rats: a model for screening antiallergic and anti-inflammatory compounds. Phytomedicine 1998; 5: 115-119.
  • 15 Blackwell C., Carnuccio R., Di Rosa M. Macrocortin. A polypeptide causing the anti-phospholipase effect of glucorticoids. Nature 1980; 287: 147-149.
  • 16 Lo T.N., Almeida A.P., Beaven M.A. Dextran and carrageenan evoke different inflammatory response in rat with respect to composition of infiltrates and effect of indomethacin. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutic 1982; 221: 261-267.
  • 17 Jäggi U, Würgler U, Grandjean F, Weiser M. Doppia inibizione della 5-lipoossigenasi/cicloossigenasi con un farmaco omeopatico ricostituito. Possibile interpretazione dell′efficacia e buona tollerabilitá gastrointestinale. La Medicina Biológica 2005; Gennaio- Marzo: 17–25.
  • 18 Katz L.B., Theobald H.D., Bookstaff R.C. Characterization of the enhanced paw oedema response to carrageenan and dextran in 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin-treated rats. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutic 1984; 230: 670-677.
  • 19 Swingle K.F., Reiter M.J., Schwartzmiller D.H. Comparison of croton oil and cantharidin induced inflammation of the mouse ear and their modification by topically applied drugs. Archives International of Pharmacodynamic 1981; 254: 168-176.
  • 20 Tragni E., Tubaro A., Melis S., Galli C.L. Evidence for an anti-inflammatory action of a natural extract utilizing two classic irritation tests. Food Chemical and Toxicology 1985; 23: 317-319.
  • 21 Galey G.I., Ziboh V.A., Marcelo C.I., Voorhees J.J. Modulation of phospholipid metabolism in murine keratinocytes by tumor promoter, 12-O-tetradecanoyl-13-acetate. Journal of Investigation in Dermatology 1985; 85: 319-323.
  • 22 Inoue H., Saito K., Koshihara Y., Muroto S. Inhibitory effect of glycyrrhetinic acid derivatives on lipoxygenase and prostaglandin syntetase. Chemical and Pharmacology Bulletin 1986; 34: 897-901.
  • 23 Young JM, De Young LM. Cutaneous models of inflammation for the evaluation of topical and systemic pharmacological agents. In: Pharmacological Methods in the Control of Inflammation. New York: Alan R Liss; 1989. pp 215–231.
  • 24 Clarke JH. Rhus toxicodendron. Um dicionario de Matéria Médica practica. Editora B. Jain Publishers Pvt. Ltd., vol. III, 1997.
  • 25 Vane J.R. The mode of action of aspirin and similar compounds. Journal of Allergy Clinical and Immunology 1971; 58: 691-712.
  • 26 Carson JL, Stron BL. The gastrointestinal toxicity of the non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. In: Side-effects of Antiinflammatory Drugs. Dordrecht, Boston, Baltimore: Kluwer Academic Publishers, vol. 3, 1993, p. 1–8.
  • 27 Asako H., Kubes P., Wallace J., Gaginella T., Wolf R.E., Granger D.N. Indomethacin-induced leukocyte adhesion in mesenteric venules: role of lipoxygenase products. American Journal of Physiology 1992; 262: G903-G908.
  • 28 Rang H.P. Farmacologia. Tradutores: Patricia Lydie Voeux, Antônio José Magalhães da Silva Moreira. Elsevier: Rio de Janeiro; 2004.
  • 29 Duarte I.D.G., Nakamura M., Ferreira S.H. Participation of the sympathetic system in acetic acid induced writhing in mice. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 1988; 21: 341-343.
  • 30 Duarte I.D.G., Nakamura-Craig M., Ferreira-Alves D.L. Possible participation of endogenous opioid peptides on the mechanism involved in analgesia induced by vouacapan. Life Sciences 1992; 50: 891-897.
  • 31 Carvalho JCT. Caesalpinia ferrea (Pau-ferro): Avaliação da atividade antiinflamatória e analgésica. Tese (Dissertação de Mestrado). Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas da Universidade de São Paulo – USP, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 1993.