Treatment of hyperactive children: Increased efficiency through modifications of homeopathic diagnostic procedure
Received22 March 2006
revised12 April 2006
accepted08 May 2006
26 December 2017 (online)
Background: The rigorous test to which homeopathy was subject in our recent double-blind clinical trail of homeopathic treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) necessitated optimized treatment meeting the highest standards.
Methods: Optimization was performed in three steps: (1) In successfully treated children, prescriptions leading to an insufficient response were analysed by a general questionnaire to identify unreliable symptoms. (2) Polarity analysis, a further development of Bönninghausen's concept of contraindications, was introduced in response to the frequently one-sided symptoms. This enabled us to use few but specific symptoms to identify the medicine whose genius symptoms exhibit the closest match to the patient's characteristic symptoms. (3) We investigated the influence of the primary perception symptoms on the result of the repertorization. Perception symptoms are not normally recorded during a patient interview even though they are among the most reliable facts related by the patients. At the same time we were able to improve the continuity of improvement of ADHD symptoms using liquid Q-potencies.
Results: Introducing the questionnaire, polarity analysis, and including perception symptoms, lead to an improvement in the success rate of the first prescription from 21% to 54%, of the fifth prescription from 68% to 84%.
- 1 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DSM-IV. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
- 2 Lahey B.B., Applegate B., McBurnett K., Biederman J., Greenhill L., Hynd G.W. DSM-IV field trials for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Am J Psychiatry 1994; 151: 1673-1685.
- 3 Conners C.K. Conners Rating Scales (revised), Technical Manual. Toronto: MHS; 1997.
- 4 Hahnemann S. Organon der Heilkunst, Ausgabe 6 B. Heidelberg: Haug; 1989.
- 5 Frei H. Die homöopathische Behandlung von Kindern mit ADS/ADHS. Stuttgart: Haug; 2005.
- 6 Frei H. Die Rangordnungen der Symptome von Hahnemann, Bönninghausen, Hering und Kent, evaluiert anhand von 175 Kasuistiken. ZKH 1999; 4: 143-155.
- 7 Frei H., Everts R., von Ammon K., Kaufmann F., Walther D., Hsu-Schmitz S.F. Homeopathic treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Eur J Ped 2005; 164: 758-767.
- 8 Bönninghausen C v. Therapeutisches Taschenbuch 2000, Hrsg. K.-H. Gypser. Sonntag: Stuttgart, 2000.
- 9 Bönnighausen Arbeitsgemeinschaft. Repertorisationsprogramm zum Bönninghausen Taschenbuch 2000. Sinzig Löhndorf: Bönninghausen Arbeitsgemeinschaft; 2000. (order from: www.boenninghausen.de.)
- 10 Steiner U. Amokoor Repertorisationsprogramm 2006. Immensee: Steiner; 2006. (order from: www.urssteiner.ch or www.sahp.ch.)
- 11 Frei H., Thurneysen A. Treatment for hyperactive children: homeopathy and methylphenidate compared in a family setting. Brit Hom J 2001; 90: 183-188.
- 12 Stolper C.F., Rutten A.L.B., Lutgen R.F.G., Barthels R.J.W.M. Improving homeopathic prescription by applying epidemiological techniques: the role of likelihood ratio. Homeopathy 2002; 91: 203-238.
- 13 Rutten A.L.B., Stolper C.F., Lutgen R.F.G., Barthels R.W.J.M. Is assessment of likelihood ratio of homeopathic symptoms possible? A pilot study. Homeopathy 2003; 92: 213-216.
- 14 Rutten A.L.B., Stolper C.F., Lutgen R.F.G., Barthels R.W.J.M. Cure as gold standard for likelihood ratio assessment: theoretical considerations. Homeopathy 2004; 93: 78-83.
- 15 Rutten A.L.B., Stolper C.F., Lutgen R.F.G., Barthels R.J.W.M. A Bayesian perspective on the reliability of homeopathic repertories. Homeopathy 2006; 95: 88-93.
- 16 Dunham C. Lectures on Materia Medica. Reprint. Delhi: Jain Publishers; 1885.
- 17 Dunham C. Homeopathy, The Science of Therapeutics. Delhi: Pratap Medical Publishers, without year.
- 18 Holzapfel K. Zur Kritik der pathognomonischen Symptome. Z Klass Hom 2002; 46: 183-193.