Download PDF
Homeopathy 2005; 94(04): 229-232
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2005.07.001
Original paper
Copyright ©The Faculty of Homeopathy 2005

Stimulation of bovine sperm mitochondrial activity by homeopathic dilutions of monensin

DM Aziz
1   Department of Surgery and Obstetrics, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq
,
H Enbergs
2   Institute of Anatomy, Physiology and Hygiene of Domestic Animals, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 17 February 2005
revised 18 May 2005

accepted 11 July 2005

Publication Date:
17 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Mitochondrial activity is an important viability parameter of spermatozoa and is linked to sperm motility. Monensin is commonly used as an inhibitor for sperm mitochondrial activity in the laboratory. This study was conducted to evaluate the influence of some homeopathic dilutions of monensin on sperm mitochondrial activity. Fresh ejaculates from 6 mature bulls were used in the study. Samples of the semen were tested using a flow cytometer for mitochondrial activity and sperm viability using Rhodamine 123 and SYBR-14, respectively. The 9× dilution of monensin resulted in very highly significant ( P<0.001) stimulation of mitochondrial activity. Monensin 5×, 7×, 8× and 13× caused highly significant ( P<0.01) stimulation of the sperm mitochondrial activity. Other homeopathic dilutions of monensin (6×, 10×, 11×, 12× and 14×) also had a significant ( P<0.05) stimulatory effect. The use of monensin did not have any negative effect on sperm viability. We conclude that some homeopathic dilutions of monensin increase mitochondrial activity of bovine spermatozoa without negative effect on sperm viability, the 9× dilution was the most effective. Further in vivo studies are required to estimate the effect of homeopathic dilutions of monensin on semen quality.

Keywords

sperm - mitochondrial activity - monensin - homeopathy
 

  • References

  • 1 Troiano L, Granata A.R, Cossarizza A. et al. Mitochondrial membrane potential and DNA stainability in human sperm cells, a flow cytometry analysis with implications for male infertility. Exp Cell Res 1998; 241: 384-393.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Stibbe J.R. Homeopathy in dermatology. Clin Dermatol 1999; 17: 65-68.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kleijnen J, Knipschild P, ter Riet G. Clinical trials of homeopathy. Br Med J 1991; 302: 316-323.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ernst E, Kaptchuk T.J. Homeopathy revisited. Arch Internal Med 1996; 156: 2162-2164.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Oberbaum M, Cambar J. Hormesis: dose-dependent reverse effects of low and very low doses. Endler P.C, Schulte J. Ultra High Dilution, Physiology and Physics. 1994. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 5-18.
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Reinhart E. Hormesis und die Bewertung kleinster Dosen von Wirkstoffen. Biol Med 1998; 27: 51-54.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Dharmendr K.M.B.C, Ian L, Sam S. The simultaneous determination of the ionophore antibiotics in animal tissues eggs by tandem electrospray LC–MS–MS. Food Chem 2001; 75: 345-354.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bergstrom R.C, Maki L.R. Effect of monensin in young crossbred lambs with naturally occurring coccidiosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1978; 165: 288.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Fitzgerald P.R. Efficacy of monensin against bovine coccidiosis in young Holstein–Friesian calves. J Protozool 1973; 20: 121.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Richardson L.F, Raun A.P, Potter E.L, Cooley C.O, Rathmatiher R.P. Effects of monensin on ruminal fermentation in vitro and in vivo . J Anim Sci 1974; 39: 250.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Donoho A.L. Biochemical studies on the fate of monensin in animals and in the environment. J Anim Sci 1984; 58: 1528-1529.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Mollenhauer H.H, Morré D.J, Rowes R.D. Alteration of intracellular traffic by monensin: mechanism, specificity and relationship to toxicity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1990; 1031: 225-246.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Langston V.C, Galey F, Lovell R, Buck W.B. Toxicity and therapeutics of monensin: a review. Vet Med 1985; 80: 75-84.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wilson J.S. Toxic myopathy in a dog associated with the presence of Monensin in dry food. Can Vet J 1980; 21: 30-31.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Papaioannou K.Z, Murphy R.P, Monks R.S. et al. Assessment of viability and mitochondrial function of equine spermatozoa using double staining and flow cytometery. Theriogenology 1997; 48: 299-312.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Graham J.K, Kunze E, Hammerstedt R.H. Analysis of sperm cell viability, acrosomal integrity, and mitochondrial function using flow cytometry. Biol Reprod 1990; 43: 55-64.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Garner D.L, Thomas C.A, Joerg H.W, DeJarnette J.M, Marshall C.E. Fluorometric assessments of mitochondrial function and viability in cryopreserved bovine spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 1997; 57: 1401-1406.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Auger J, Ronot X, Dadoune J.P. Human sperm mitochondrial function related to motility: a flow and image cytometric assessment. J Androl 1989; 10: 439-448.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Graham J.K, Kunze E, Hammerstedt R.H. Analysis of sperm cell viability, acrosomal integrity, and mitochondrial function using flow cytometry. Biol Reprod 1990; 43: 55-64.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Dantas F, Rampes H. Do homeopathic medicines provoke adverse effects? A systematic review. Homeopathy 2000; 89: 35-38.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G. et al. Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebocontrolled trials. Lancet 1997; 350: 834-843.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hahnemann S. Organon of Medicine. 6th edn. Los Angeles, CA: J.P. Tarcher; 1982. pp. 269–272
    Google Scholar