Homeopathy 2005; 94(01): 44-48
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2004.10.001
Education and Debate
Copyright ©The Faculty of Homeopathy 2004

Models for explaining the homeopathic healing process: a historical and critical account of principles central to homeopathy

G. Guajardo
1   Av. Larroque 1709, Col Nueva, Mexicali BC. Mexico cp 21100
,
J. Wilson
2   536 Brotherton Road, Escondido, CA 92025-6454, USA
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received09. Juli 2003
revised30. Juni 2004

accepted11. Oktober 2004

Publikationsdatum:
13. Dezember 2017 (online)

Abstract

The success of Homeopathy in curing many diseases has been a serious challenge to science. Nineteenth century explanations for the healing process of Homeopathy cannot withstand the scrutiny of modern science and need to be abandoned or modified. The surviving propositions are discussed. A biocybernetic model with multilevels of electromagnetic feedback loops offers a hope of explaining the healing process. This model, its explanation of the healing process and experimental support are elaborated.

 
  • References

  • 1 Rodriguez R, Rosas Landa V. Estudio temático sobre el numero de Avogadro y el medicamento homeopático. La Hom México 1991; 547: 12-15.
  • 2 Rodríguez R, Rosas Landa V. El medicamento homeopático y el numero de Avogadro. La Hom México 1991; 554: 24-26.
  • 3 Benveniste J. Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE. Nature 1988; 333: 816-818.
  • 4 McDevitt H.O, Bodmer W.F. Histocompatibility antigens, immune responsiveness and susceptibility to disease. Am J Med 1972; 52: 1-8.
  • 5 Stastny P, Ball E.J, Dry P.J, Nunez G. The human immune response region (HLA-D) and disease susceptibility. Immunol Rev 1983; 70: 111-154.
  • 6 Monod J. El Azar y la necesidad. Barcelona: Orbis; 1979
  • 7 Reilly S. et al. Is evidence for homeopathy reproducible?. The Lancet 1994; 344: 1601-1606.
  • 8 Muscari Tomaioli G, Allegri F, Miali F, Pomposelli R, Tubia P, Targhetta A, Castellini M, Bellavite P. Observational study in quality of life in patients with headache, receiving homeopathic treatment. Br Hom J 2001; 90: 189-197.
  • 9 Ventoskovsky Bm, Popov A.V. Homeopathy as a practical alternative to traditional obstetric methods. Br Hom J 1990; 79: 201-205.
  • 10 Popov A. Homeopathy in the treatment of patients with fibromyoma of the uterus. Br Hom J 1992; 81: 164-167.
  • 11 Fisher P. Effect of homeopathic treatment on fibrositis. BMJ 1989; 299: 365-366.
  • 12 Queralt Gimeno M.L. Homeopathic treatment of ovarian cyst. Br Hom J 1991; 80: 143-148.
  • 13 Jacobs J. et al. Treatment of acute childhood diarrhea with homeopathic medicines. A randomized clinical trial in Nicaragua. Pediatrics 1994; 93: 719-725.
  • 14 Ochoa F, Ruiz A, Searcy R. Control de tensión arterial elevada con Lachesis muta 200c en el servicio de urgencias del Hospital Nacional Homeopático. Boletín Mexicano Hom 1995; 28 (02) 48-53.
  • 15 Frei H, Thurneysen A. Treatment for hyperactive children. homeopathy and methylphenidate compared in a family setting. Br Hom J 2001; 90: 183-188.
  • 16 Becker R.O. The bioelectric field pattern in the salamander and its stimulation by an electronic analogue. IRE Trans Biomed Electron 1960; 7: 202-207.
  • 17 Aissa J, Litime M.H, Attias E, Benveniste J. Molecular signaling at high dilution or by means of electronic circuitry. FASEB J 1993; 150: A146.
  • 18 Litime M.H, Aissa J, Benveniste J. Antigen signaling at high dilution. FASEB J 1993; 7: A602.
  • 19 Sekekowitsch F, Endler P.C, Pongratz W, Smith C.W. Hormone effects by CD record/replay. FASEB J 1995; 9: A392.
  • 20 Benveniste J, Aissa J, Jurgens P, Pham D. Effect on the isolated heart of water preexposed to a permanent magnetic field. FASEB J 1995; 9: A425.
  • 21 Citro M, Endler P.C, Pongratz W, Vinattieri C, Smith C.W, Schulte J. Hormone effects by electronic transmission. FASEB J 1995; 9: A392.
  • 22 Benveniste J, Jurgens P, Aissa J. Digital recording/transmission of the cholinergic signal. FASEB J 1996; 10: A1479.
  • 23 Benveniste J, Aïssa J, Guillonnet D. Digital biology; specificity of the digitized molecular signal. FASEB J 1998; 12: A412.
  • 24 Benveniste J, Aïssa J, Guillonnet D. A simple and fast method for in vivo demonstration of electromagnetic molecular signaling (EMS) via high dilution or computer recording. FASEB J 1999; 13: A163.
  • 25 Benveniste J, Aïssa J, Guillonnet D. The molecular signal is not functional in the absence of ‘informed’ water. FASEB J 1999; 13: A163.
  • 26 Becker RO. The direct current control system. New York State J Med 1962; 1173.
  • 27 Becker R.O. Search of evidence of axial current flows in peripheral nerves of salamander. Science 1961; 134: 101-102.
  • 28 Becker R.O. Effects of electric currents on bone in vivo . Nature 1964; 204: 652-654.
  • 29 Endler P.C. et al. Ultra high dilution. Physiology and Physics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1994
  • 30 Bayr G. Kybernetic und homoopatische Medizin. Heidelberg: Haug, Verlag; 1866
  • 31 Bernbek S. Homeopatía. Una terapia Básica. México: Propulsora de Homeopatía; 1991. p. 29
  • 32 Resendiz J. Accion de Bufo rana sobre la dopamina cerebral. Temas de Investigación en Homeopatía, Chapter 8, México: Propulsora de Homeopatía; 1991.
  • 33 Sánchez-Resendiz J. Efecto de Lachesis trigonocephalus sobre dopamina cerebral en rata.
  • 34 Sukul N.C, Paul A, Sinhababu S.P. Hypothalamic neuronal responses of rats to homeopathic drugs. Omeomed 92. Bologna: Editrice Compsoitori; 1993. 1pp
  • 35 Sukul N.C, Abuev A.S, Sabanov V, Kourzina N.P. Neuronal activity in the lateral hypothalamus of the cat and the medial frontal cortex of the rat in response to homeopathic drugs. Indian Biol 1991; 23 (02) 17.
  • 36 Becker R.O. Cross Currents. Los Angeles: Jeremy P Tharcher Inc.; 1990