Abstract
At the end of the last century, debate on the pros and cons of homoeopathy was lively
in Germany. By 1920 it had died down almost entirely and homoeopathy seemed to have
gone into a decline. In 1925 the prominent surgeon August Bier published a paper which
immediately revived the discussion and helped homoeopathy become a prevalent form
of treatment again in Germany. His paper and the at times emotional exchanges that
followed were directly responsible for a change of climate in the discussion between
homoeopaths and representatives of the conventional school, a number of clinical investigations
into the question of clinical efficacy and the creation of a university chair of homoeopathy
in 1929. Reading this story one can hardly help being impressed and amused by similarities
between then and now.