Abstract
This review discusses the clinical and experimental evidence for the efficacy of homœopathic
treatment of disease. The conclusion is that despite a great deal of experimental
and clinical work there is only a little scientific evidence to suggest that homœopathy
is effective. This is because of bad design, excution, reporting or failure to repeat
experimental work and not necessarily because of the inefficacy of the system which
has yet to be properly tested on a large enough scale. It is suggested that there
is sufficient evidence to warrant the execution of well-designed, carefully-controlled
experiments, particularly in naturally diseased organisms, to investigate the efficacy
of homœopathy further. Some of the experimental work already done suggests that homœopathy
may be of value in the treatment and prevention of diseases in crops as well as animals
and humans.