J Hand Microsurg 2015; 07(01): 61-66
DOI: 10.1007/s12593-015-0174-6
Original Article
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Accuracy of MRI-based Diagnoses for Distal Upper Extremity Soft Tissue Masses

Kathleen E. McKeon
1   Andrews Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, 805 St. Vincent’s Drive, Ste. 100, Birmingham, AL, 35205, USA
,
Brian T. Wright
2   Vanderbilt School of Medicine, 1161 21st Avenue South, Ste. T1217, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
,
Donald H. Lee
3   Vanderbilt Orthopaedic Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1215 21st Avenue South, Ste. 3200, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA   Email: donald.h.lee@vanderbilt.edu
› Author Affiliations

Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

09 September 2014

05 January 2015

Publication Date:
13 September 2016 (online)

Abstract

To determine the accuracy of the pre-operative MRI-based diagnosis of soft tissue masses in the forearm, wrist, and hand, the records of 144 patients who underwent an MRI followed by excision of a soft tissue mass in the forearm, wrist, or hand were reviewed. The MRI-based diagnosis was compared to the histological diagnosis, which was considered the gold standard. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the MRI-based diagnosis were calculated. A multivariate regression analysis was performed.While the accuracy of the MRI-based diagnosis varied widely, there was an overall sensitivity of 75 %. The most accurate diagnosis was an MRI-based diagnosis of ganglion cyst, which had a sensitivity of 94.7 % and a specificity of 94.4 %. Of particular concern was that the MRI-based diagnosis of a malignancy was only 66.7 % sensitive, with a positive predictive value of 44.4 %. On multivariate regression analysis, there was a trend towards improved accuracy in the wrist when compared to the finger, although this did not reach statistical significance.While pre-operative MRI remains a valuable tool for the evaluation of soft tissue masses in the distal upper extremity, caution is warranted when basing the diagnosis on MRI evidence alone.

Level of Evidence: Level IV/Diagnostic

 
  • References

  • 1 Wolfe SC, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Kozin SH. Green’s operative hand surgery. 6th edn Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; Philadelphia: 2011
  • 2 Blamire AM. The technology of MRI—the next 10 years. Br J Radiol 2008; 81 (968) 601-617
  • 3 Kransdorf MJ, Bridges MD. Current developments and recent advances in musculoskeletal tumor imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2013; 17 (2) 145-155
  • 4 Dewan AK, Chhabra AB, Khanna AJ, Anderson MW, Brunton LM. Magnetic resonance imaging of the hand and wrist: techniques and spectrum of disease: AAOS exhibit section. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (10) e68
  • 5 Ergun T, Lakadamyali H, Derincek A, Tarhan NC, Ozturk A. Magnetic resonance imaging in the visualization of benign tumors and tumor-like lesions of the hand and wrist. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2010; 39 (1) 1-16
  • 6 Nguyen V, Choi J, Davis KW. Imaging of wrist masses. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2004; 33 (4) 147-160
  • 7 Capelastegui A, Astigarraga E, Fernandez-Canton G, Saralegui I, Larena JA, Merino A. Masses and pseudomasses of the hand and wrist: MR findings in 134 cases. Skeletal Radiol 1999; 28 (9) 498-507
  • 8 Binkovitz LA, Berquist TH, McLeod RA. Masses of the hand and wrist: detection and characterization with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154 (2) 323-326
  • 9 Miller TT, Potter HG, McCormack Jr RR. Benign soft tissue masses of the wrist and hand: MRI appearances. Skeletal Radiol 1994; 23 (5) 327-332
  • 10 Nilsson J, Sandberg K, Nielsen S, Dahlin LB. Magnetic resonance imaging of peripheral nerve tumors in the upper extremity. 2009; Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 43 (3) 153-159
  • 11 Al-Qattan MM, Al-Namla A, Al-Thunayan A, Al-Subhi F, El-Shayeb AF. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of glomus tumors of the hand. J Hand Surg (Br) 2005; 30 (5) 535-540
  • 12 Brisson M, Kashima T, Delaney D, Tirabosco R, Clarke A, Cro S, Flanagan AM, O’Donnell P. MRI characteristics of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma: retrospective comparison with histology and MDM2 gene amplification. Skeletal Radiol 2013; 42 (5) 635-647