J Hand Microsurg 2014; 06(01): 8-12
DOI: 10.1007/s12593-013-0106-2
Original Article
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

A Comparison of the Reliability of Make Versus Break Testing in Measuring Palmar Abduction Strength of the Thumb

J.X. Lim
1   Department of Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore   Email: sandeepsebastin@gmail.com
,
R.X. Toh
2   Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
,
S.K.H. Chook
2   Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
,
S.J. Sebastin
1   Department of Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore   Email: sandeepsebastin@gmail.com
,
T. Karjalainen
3   Department of Surgery, Central Hospital of Central Finland, Keskussairaalantie 19, 40620 Jyväskylä, Finland
› Author Affiliations

Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

18 April 2013

02 October 2013

Publication Date:
13 September 2016 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Previous studies have established the role of quantitative measurements of palmar abduction strength of the thumb (PAST). This study compares the reliability of the ‘make’ versus the ‘break’ test in measuring PAST in healthy volunteers. In a ‘make’ test, the body part being tested is positioned at the start of its range of motion and the participant is asked to exert his/her maximal force. In a ‘break’ test, increasing force is applied to a body part after it has completed its range of motion, until the joint being tested gives way. PAST was measured in both hands in 100 healthy volunteers using a handheld device. Two examiners measured PAST using both the ‘make’ and ‘break’ test to determine inter-rater reliability. The tests were repeated in 30 volunteers 6 weeks after the initial testing to determine intra-rater reliability. Our results showed that the ‘make’ test has better inter and intra-rater reliability.