Download PDF
Zhang, Fuxiang et al.: 2022 The Art of Refractive Cataract Surgery DOI: 10.1055/b-0042-188825

9 Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

More Information

Book

Editors: Zhang, Fuxiang; Sugar, Alan; Arbisser, Lisa Brothers

Authors: Dick, H. Burkhard; Donaldson, Kendall E.; Gerste, Ronald D.; Masket, Samuel; Matossian, Cynthia; Osher, Robert H.; Sugar, Alan; Venkateswaran, Nandini; Zhang, Fuxiang

Title: The Art of Refractive Cataract Surgery

Subtitle: For Residents, Fellows, and Beginners

Print ISBN: 9781684202577; Online ISBN: 9781684202621; Book DOI: 10.1055/b000000145

1. Edition © 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., New York

Subjects: Ophthalmology, Optometry

Thieme Clinical Collections (English Language)



 
Fuxiang Zhang, Alan Sugar, and Lisa Brothers Arbisser

Abstract

It is not exaggerating to say that the arrival of multifocal intraocular lenses (MFIOLs) was one of the major milestones for refractive cataract surgery. It has helped many patients get rid of their readers, but it has also brought lots of challenges for both patients and surgeons. This chapter will discuss overall patient satisfaction, the main visual and optical tradeoffs of MFIOLs, the strategies used if a patient is not happy with the first eye MFIOL, the impact of aberration profile, central ring size, angle alpha and angle kappa, the neuroadaptation process and reliability, and candidate selections.

Key words

multifocal IOL - refractive cataract surgery - spherical aberration - angle alpha - angle kappa - dysphotopsia - halo and glare
 
  • 1 Wilkins MR, Allan BD, Rubin GS, et al. Randomized trial of multifocal intraocular lenses versus monovision after bilateral cataract surgery.. Ophthalmology 2013; 120 (12) 2449-2455.e1 PubMed (PMID: 24070808)
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Zhang F, Sugar A, Jacobsen G, Collins M. Visual function and patient satisfaction: comparison between bilateral diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses and monovision pseudophakia.. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37 (3) 446-453 PubMed (PMID: 21333868)
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Labiris G, Giarmoukakis A, Patsiamanidi M, Papadopoulos Z, Kozobolis VP. Mini-monovision versus multifocal intraocular lens implantation.. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015; 41 (1) 53-57 PubMed (PMID: 24962144)
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Packer M, Chu YR, Waltz KL et al. Evaluation of the aspheric tecnis multifocal intraocular lens: one-year results from the first cohort of the food and drug administration clinical trial.. Am J Ophthalmol 2010; 149 (4) 577-584.e1 PubMed (PMID: 20138609)
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data (SSED). U.S. Food and Drug Administration. PMA P040020/S087. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf4/P040020S087B.pdf
  • 6 Greenstein S, Pineda II R. The quest for spectacle independence: a comparison of multifocal intraocular lens implants and pseudophakic monovision for patients with presbyopia.. Semin Ophthalmol 2017; 32 (1) 111-115 PubMed (PMID: 27792408)
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Findl O. Intraocular lens materials and design. In: Colvard DM, ed. Achieving excellence in cataract surgery: a step-by-step approach. Self-Published; 2009:95–108
  • 8 Holladay JT. Multifocal IOLs: patient selection and optical performance. Healio: Ocular Surgery News. Published online January 31, 2017. Published in print February 10, 2017. Accessed January 5, 2021. https://www.healio.com/news/ ophthalmology/20170125/multifocal-iols-patient-selection-and-optical-performance
  • 10 Kim EJ, Sajjad A, Montes de Oca I et al. Refractive outcomes after multifocal intraocular lens exchange.. J Cataract Refract Surg 2017; 43 (6) 761-766 PubMed (PMID: 28732609)
    Google Scholar
  • 11 de Vries NE, Webers CA, Touwslager WR et al. Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses.. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37 (5) 859-865 PubMed (PMID: 21397457)
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Bhavsar AR. Do multifocal optics compromise retinal treatment? In: Chang DF, ed. Mastering refractive IOLs. Slack Incorporated; 2008:866–869
  • 13 de Gracia P. Optical properties of monovision corrections using multifocal designs for near vision.. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016; 42 (10) 1501-1510 PubMed (PMID: 27839606)
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Zheleznyak L, Kim MJ, MacRae S, Yoon G. Impact of corneal aberrations on through-focus image quality of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses using an adaptive optics bench system.. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38 (10) 1724-1733 PubMed (PMID: 22902188)
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Karakelle M. The science behind the AcrySof IQ. Cataract Refract Surg Today. 2018:4–5
  • 16 Wang L, Dai E, Koch DD, Nathoo A. Optical aberrations of the human anterior cornea.. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29 (8) 1514-1521 PubMed (PMID: 12954298)
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Holladay JT, Piers PA, Koranyi G, van der Mooren M, Norrby NE. A new intraocular lens design to reduce spherical aberration of pseudophakic eyes.. J Refract Surg 2002; 18 (6) 683-691 PubMed (PMID: 12458861)
    Google Scholar
  • 18 McCormick GJ, Porter J, Cox IG, MacRae S. Higher-order aberrations in eyes with irregular corneas after laser refractive surgery.. Ophthalmology 2005; 112 (10) 1699-1709 PubMed (PMID: 16095700)
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Holladay JT. Small aperture IOLs will be helpful in patients with significant corneal higher-order aberrations. Ocular Surgical News. 2018:32–33
  • 20 Piccinini AL, Golan O, Hafezi F, Randleman JB. Higher-order aberration measurements: comparison between Scheimpflug and dual Scheimpflug-Placido technology in normal eyes.. J Cataract Refract Surg 2019; 45 (4) 490-494 PubMed (PMID: 30713018)
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Xu Z, Hua Y, Qiu W, Li G, Wu Q. Precision and agreement of higher order aberrations measured with ray tracing and Hartmann-Shack aberrometers.. BMC Ophthalmol 2018; 18 (1) 18 PubMed (PMID: 29374460)
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Hao J, Li L, Tian F, Zhang H. Comparison of two types of visual quality analyzer for the measurement of high order aberrations.. Int J Ophthalmol 2016; 9 (2) 292-297 PubMed (PMID: 26949654)
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Fisher BL. Presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a focus on ReSTOR intraocular lenses.. US Ophthalmic Rev 2011; 4 (1) 44-48 (PMID: NOT_FOUND)
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Hovanesian JA. The family of AcrySof IQ IOLs helps us customize the approach to vision correction. Cataract Refractive Surgery Today. Accessed April 29, 2021. https://crstoday.com/articles/my-journey-to-activefocus-optical-design-2019-jan/the-family-of-acrysof-iq-iols-helps-us-customize-the-approach-to-vision-correction-2/
  • 25 Millán MS, Vega F. Extended depth of focus intraocular lens: Chromatic performance.. Biomed Opt Express 2017; 8 (9) 4294-4309 PubMed (PMID: 28966865)
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Moshirfar M, Hoggan RN, Muthappan V. Angle Kappa and its importance in refractive surgery.. Oman J Ophthalmol 2013; 6 (3) 151-158 PubMed (PMID: 24379548)
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Garzón N, García-Montero M, López-Artero E et al. Influence of angle κ on visual and refractive outcomes after implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens.. J Cataract Refract Surg 2020; 46 (5) 721-727 PubMed (PMID: 32358267)
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Park CY, Oh SY, Chuck RS. Measurement of angle kappa and centration in refractive surgery.. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2012; 23 (4) 269-275 PubMed (PMID: 22569467)
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Holladay JT. Premium IOL centration and patient suitability. Healio: Ocular Surgery News. Published online July 8, 2016. Published in print July 10, 2016. Accessed January 6, 2021. https://www.healio.com/news/ophthalmology/20160708/premium-iol-centration-and-patient-suitability
  • 31 Meng J, Du Y, Wei L et al. Distribution of angle alpha and angle kappa in a population with cataract in Shanghai.. J Cataract Refract Surg Published ahead of print online November 19,; 2020; PubMed 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000490(PMID: 33181624)
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Sachdev GS, Sachdev M. Optimizing outcomes with multifocal intraocular lenses.. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017; 65 (12) 1294-1300 PubMed (PMID: 29208809)
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Karhanová M, Marešová K, Pluhácek F, Mlcák P, Vlácil O, Sín M. [The importance of angle kappa for centration of multifocal intraocular lenses].. Cesk Slov Oftalmol 2013; 69 (2) 64-68 PubMed (PMID: 23964870)
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Prakash G, Prakash DR, Agarwal A, Kumar DA, Agarwal A, Jacob S. Predictive factor and kappa angle analysis for visual satisfactions in patients with multifocal IOL implantation.. Eye (Lond) 2011; 25 (9) 1187-1193 PubMed (PMID: 21681216)
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Qi Y, Lin J, Leng L et al. Role of angle κ in visual quality in patients with a trifocal diffractive intraocular lens.. J Cataract Refract Surg 2018; 44 (8) 949-954 PubMed (PMID: 30033112)
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Mahr MA, Simpson MJ, Erie JC. Angle alpha orientation and magnitude distribution in a cataract surgery population.. J Cataract Refract Surg 2020; 46 (3) 372-377 PubMed (PMID: 32050213)
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Berdahl JP, Hardten DR, Kramer BA, Potvin R. Effect of astigmatism on visual acuity after multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lens implantation.. J Cataract Refract Surg 2018; 44 (10) 1192-1197 PubMed (PMID: 30243393)
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Braga-Mele R, Chang D, Dewey S, et al. Multifocal intraocular lenses: relative indications and contraindications for implantation.. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014; 40 (2) 313-322 PubMed (PMID: 24461503)
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Hayashi K, Manabe S, Yoshida M, Hayashi H. Effect of astigmatism on visual acuity in eyes with a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36 (8) 1323-1329 PubMed (PMID: 20656155)
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Schallhorn S, Hettinger KA, Pelouskova M et al. Effect of residual astigmatism on uncorrected visual acuity and patient satisfaction in pseudophakic patients.. J Cataract Refract Surg Published ahead of print online December 18,; 2020; 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000560(PMID: NOT_FOUND)
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Kershner RM. Neuroadaptation. In: Chang DF, ed. Mastering refractive IOLs: the art and science. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK, Inc.; 2008:302–304
  • 42 Alió JL, Pikkel J. Neuroadaptation. In: Alió JL, Pikkel J, eds. Multifocal intraocular lenses: the art and practice. Cham: Springer; 2014:47–52
  • 43 Rosa AM, Miranda AC, Patrício MM et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess neuroadaptation to multifocal intraocular lenses.. J Cataract Refract Surg 20; 17; 43 (10) 1287-1296 PubMed (PMID: 29120714)
    Google Scholar