Evaluation of performance of direct disk diffusion test from positively flagged blood culture broth: A large scale study from South India

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rapid turnaround time of blood culture reports should be the main motive for a clinical microbiologist for optimal patient care. Categorical agreement (CA) between direct disk diffusion (dDD) and reference disk diffusion (rDD) may vary between laboratories.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine the CA and understand various types of errors associated with antibiotic organism combination, so that caution can be derived while interpreting and reporting dDD results in the earliest meaningful time frame.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present study, dDD results were compared to the rDD results from the positive blood culture bottles. CA and various types of errors were evaluated.

RESULTS: A total of 965 pathogens and 7106 organism antibiotic combinations were evaluated in this study. Overall, there was a CA of 96% which was extremely satisfactory. The categorical disagreement was found only in 4% of organism antibiotic combinations; majority of which were major error (ME, 2.1%) followed by very ME (1%) and minor error (0.9%). The errors were marginally high for Enterobacteriaceae testing against β lactam- β lactamase inhibitor combinations, for Pseudomonas species; against aminoglycosides and ciprofloxacin and Staphylococcus species against cefoxitin, one should be vigilant while reporting dDD result of these antibiotic organism combinations.

CONCLUSION: dDD is of paramount importance for early institution of targeted therapy and is considered as one of the key stewardship intervention. Our study gives an insight that every laboratory must perform dDD for positively flagged blood culture specimens; the result of which should be confirmed later by performing rDD. One should be vigilant while reporting dDD result of BL BLI for Enterobacteriaceae; aminoglycosides and CF for Pseudomonas species; cefoxitin for Staphylococcus species and HLG for Enterococcus species. Supplementary tests such as MRSA latex should be included when necessary.

Key words

Blood culture - direct susceptibility test - disk diffusion

Publication History

Received: 14 October 2018

Accepted: 14 February 2019

Article published online:
06 April 2020

• References

• 1 Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 2017;43:304-77.
• 2 Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, Light B, Parrillo JE, Sharma S, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006;34:1589-96.
• 3 Søgaard M, Nørgaard M, Schønheyder HC. First notification of positive blood cultures and the high accuracy of the gram stain report. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:1113-7.
• 4 UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations Investigation of Blood Cultures (for Organisms other than Mycobacterium species) [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://www.apsi.it/public/ufiles/smi/b37_8_en_141104.pdf. [Last accessed on 2018 Apr 25].
• 5 Kirn TJ, Weinstein MP. Update on blood cultures: How to obtain, process, report, and interpret. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013;19:513-20.
• 6 Stokkou S, Geginat G, Schlüter D, Tammer I. Direct disk diffusion test using European clinical antimicrobial susceptibility testing breakpoints provides reliable results compared with the standard method. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp) 2015;5:103-11.
• 7 Chandrasekaran S, Abbott A, Campeau S, Zimmer BL, Weinstein M, Thrupp L, et al. Direct-from-blood-culture disk diffusion to determine antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative bacteria: Preliminary report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Methods Development and Standardization Working Group. J Clin Microbiol 2018;56. pii: e01678-17.
• 8 Doern GV, Scott DR, Rashad AL, Kim KS. Evaluation of a direct blood culture disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility test. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1981;20:696-8.
• 9 Goel G, Das D, Mukherjee S, Bose S, Das K, Bhattacharya S. A method for early detection of antibiotic resistance in positive blood cultures: Experience from an oncology centre in eastern India. Indian J Med Microbiol 2015;33:53.
• 10 Waites KB, Brookings ES, Moser SA, Zimmer BL. Direct susceptibility testing with positive BacT/Alert blood cultures by using MicroScan overnight and rapid panels. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:2052-6.
• 11 Yu FL, Lin MH, Lee JC, Lian LY, Lin CW, Chen CT, et al. Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Isolates from Blood Cultures by Direct Inoculation Method and PHOENIX. J Biomed Lab Sci 2011;23:23-7.
• 12 DRAFT: Direct Susceptibility Testing of Gram Negative Rods from Blood Cultures [Internet]. Available from: www.jscm.org/kokusai/document/2016clsi_2.pdf. [Last accessed on 2018 Apr 27].
• 13 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 27th ed. CLSI Document M100. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017.
• 14 Guidance for Industry and FDA Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (AST) Systems [Internet]. 2009. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/ GuidanceDocuments/ucm071462.pdf. [Last accessed on 2018 Apr 21].
• 15 Pien BC, Sundaram P, Raoof N, Costa SF, Mirrett S, Woods CW, et al. The clinical and prognostic importance of positive blood cultures in adults. Am J Med 2010;123:819-28.
• 16 Wooton M. BSAC Methods for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Ver. 12; May, 2013.
• 17 Desai A, Unson E, Weinstein M. Can direct disk diffusion susceptibility testing from positive blood cultures provide earlier results to clinicians? Open Forum Infect Dis 2016;3 Suppl 1:180.
• 18 Coyle MB, McGonagle LA, Plorde JJ, Clausen CR, Schoenknecht FD. Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates from blood cultures by direct inoculation and early reading of disk diffusion tests. J Clin Microbiol 1984;20:473-7.
• 19 Bennett K, Sharp SE. Rapid differentiation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus from blood cultures by use of a direct cefoxitin disk diffusion test. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:3836-8.