Computed Tomographic Analysis of Ventral Atlantoaxial Optimal Safe Implantation Corridors in 27 Dogs

Abstract

Objectives Ventral atlantoaxial stabilization techniques are challenging surgical procedures in dogs. Available surgical guidelines are based upon subjective anatomical landmarks, and limited radiographic and computed tomographic data. The aims of this study were (1) to provide detailed anatomical descriptions of atlantoaxial optimal safe implantation corridors to generate objective recommendations for optimal implant placements and (2) to compare anatomical data obtained in non-affected Toy breed dogs, affected Toy breed dogs suffering from atlantoaxial instability and non-affected Beagle dogs.

Methods Anatomical data were collected from a prospectively recruited population of 27 dogs using a previously validated method of optimal safe implantation corridor analysis using computed tomographic images.

Results Optimal implant positions and three-dimensional numerical data were generated successfully in all cases. Anatomical landmarks could be used to generate objective definitions of optimal insertion points which were applicable across all three groups. Overall the geometrical distribution of all implant sites was similar in all three groups with a few exceptions.

Clinical Significance This study provides extensive anatomical data available to facilitate surgical planning of implant placement for atlantoaxial stabilization. Our data suggest that non-affected Toy breed dogs and non-affected Beagle dogs constitute reasonable research models to study atlantoaxial stabilization constructs.

Keywords

canine - atlantoaxial - atlantoaxial instability - computed tomography - neurosurgery

• References

• 1 Aikawa T, Shibata M, Fujita H. Modified ventral stabilization using positively threaded profile pins and polymethylmethacrylate for atlantoaxial instability in 49 dogs. Vet Surg 2013; 42 (06) 683-692.
• 2 Geary JC, Oliver JE, Hoerlein BF. Atlanto axial subluxation in the canine. J Small Anim Pract 1967; 8 (10) 577-582.
• 3 Kishigami M. Application of an atlanto-axial retractor for atlanto-axial subluxation in the cat and dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1984; 20: 413-419.
• 4 Schulz KS, Waldron DR, Fahie M. Application of ventral pins and polymethylmethacrylate for the management of atlantoaxial instability: results in nine dogs. Vet Surg 1997; 26 (04) 317-325.
• 5 Sorjonen DC, Shires PK. Atlantoaxial Instability: a ventral surgical technique for decompression, fixation, and fusion. Vet Surg 1981; 10: 22-29.
• 6 Beaver DP, Ellison GW, Lewis DD, Goring RL, Kubilis PS, Barchard C. Risk factors affecting the outcome of surgery for atlantoaxial subluxation in dogs: 46 cases (1978-1998). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000; 216 (07) 1104-1109.
• 7 Slanina MC. Atlantoaxial instability. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2016; 46 (02) 265-275.
• 8 Platt SR, Chambers JN, Cross A. A modified ventral fixation for surgical management of atlantoaxial subluxation in 19 dogs. Vet Surg 2004; 33 (04) 349-354.
• 9 Vizcaíno Revés N, Stahl C, Stoffel M, Bali M, Forterre F. CT scan based determination of optimal bone corridor for atlantoaxial ventral screw fixation in miniature breed dogs. Vet Surg 2013; 42 (07) 819-824.
• 10 Hettlich BF, Allen MJ, Pascetta D, Fosgate GT, Litsky AS. Biomechanical comparison between bicortical pin and mono- cortical screw/polymethylmethacrylate constructs in the cadaveric canine cervical vertebral column. Vet Surg 2013; 42 (06) 693-700.
• 11 Hicks DG, Pitts MJ, Bagley RS. et al. In vitro biomechanical evaluations of screw-bar-polymethylmethacrylate and pin-polymethylmethacrylate internal fixation implants used to stabilize the vertebral motion unit of the fourth and fifth cervical vertebrae in vertebral column specimens from dogs. Am J Vet Res 2009; 70 (06) 719-726.
• 12 Chung SS, Lee CS, Chung HW, Kang CS. CT analysis of the axis for transarticular screw fixation of rheumatoid atlantoaxial instability. Skeletal Radiol 2006; 35 (09) 679-683.
• 13 Fu M, Lin L, Kong X. et al. Construction and accuracy assessment of patient-specific biocompatible drill template for cervical anterior transpedicular screw (ATPS) insertion: an in vitro study. PLoS One 2013; 8 (01) e53580.
• 14 Igarashi T, Kikuchi S, Sato K, Kayama S, Otani K. Anatomic study of the axis for surgical planning of transarticular screw fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (408) 162-166.
• 15 Kamimura M, Ebara S, Itoh H, Tateiwa Y, Kinoshita T, Takaoka K. Cervical pedicle screw insertion: assessment of safety and accuracy with computer-assisted image guidance. J Spinal Disord 2000; 13 (03) 218-224.
• 16 Kazan S, Yildirim F, Sindel M, Tuncer R. Anatomical evaluation of the groove for the vertebral artery in the axis vertebrae for atlanto-axial transarticular screw fixation technique. Clin Anat 2000; 13 (04) 237-243.
• 17 Ludwig SC, Kramer DL, Balderston RA, Vaccaro AR, Foley KF, Albert TJ. Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques. Spine 2000; 25 (13) 1655-1667.
• 18 Leblond G, Gaitero L, Moens NM. et al. Canine atlantoaxial optimal safe implantation corridors - description and validation of a novel 3D presurgical planning method using OsiriX™. BMC Vet Res 2016; 12 (01) 188.
• 19 Parry AT, Upjohn MM, Schlegl K, Kneissl S, Lamb CR. Computed tomography variations in morphology of the canine atlas in dogs with and without atlantoaxial subluxation. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2010; 51 (06) 596-600.
• 20 Chern JJ, Chamoun RB, Whitehead WE, Curry DJ, Luerssen TG, Jea A. Computed tomography morphometric analysis for axial and subaxial translaminar screw placement in the pediatric cervical spine. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2009; 3 (02) 121-128.
• 21 Takahashi J, Shono Y, Nakamura I. et al. Computer-assisted screw insertion for cervical disorders in rheumatoid arthritis. Eur Spine J 2007; 16 (04) 485-494.