Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016; 29(05): 386-393
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-16-03-0041
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Comparison of two ultrasound-guided injection techniques targeting the sacroiliac joint region in equine cadavers

John David Stack
1   University College Dublin Veterinary Hospital, Large Animal Surgery, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
,
Chiara Bergamino
2   University College Dublin Veterinary Hospital, Diagnostic Imaging, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
,
Ruth Sanders
3   Chiltern Equine Clinic – Blueberry Farm Hospital, Warfield, Berks, UK
,
Ursula Fogarty
4   Irish Equine Centre, Co. Kildare, Ireland
,
Antonella Puggioni
2   University College Dublin Veterinary Hospital, Diagnostic Imaging, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
,
Clodagh Kearney
1   University College Dublin Veterinary Hospital, Large Animal Surgery, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
,
Florent David
5   Bjerke Dyrehospital en Rikstoto Klinikk, Oslo, Norway
› Author Affiliations

Funding: This study was funded, in part by the J.P. O’Connor Memorial Prize awarded to Ruth Sanders in 2014.
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 03 March 2016

Accepted: 21 June 2016

Publication Date:
19 December 2017 (online)

Preview

Summary

Objectives: To compare the accuracy and distribution of injectate for cranial (CR) and caudomedial (CM) ultrasound-guided injections of equine sacroiliac joints.

Methods: Both sacroiliac joints from 10 lumbo sacropelvic specimens were injected using cranial parasagittal (CR; curved 18 gauge, 25 cm spinal needles) and caudomedial (CM; straight 18 gauge, 15 cm spinal needles) ultrasound-guided approaches. Injectate consisted of 4 ml iodinated contrast and 2 ml methylene blue. Computed tomo-graphical (CT) scans were performed before and after injections. Time for needle guidance and repositioning attempts were recorded. The CT sequences were analysed for accuracy and distribution of contrast.

Results: Intra-articular contrast was detected in sacroiliac joints following 15/40 injections. The CR and CM approaches deposited injectate ≤ 2 cm from sacroiliac joint margins following 17/20 and 20/20 injections, respectively. Median distance of closest contrast to the sacroiliac joint was 0.4 cm (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.5 cm) for CR approaches and 0.6 cm (IQR: 0.95 cm) for CM approaches. Cranial injections resulted in injectate contacting lumbosacral intertrans-verse joints 15/20 times. Caudomedial injections were perivascular 16/20 times.

Limitations: Safety and efficacy could not be established.

Clinical relevance: Cranial and CM ultra-sound-guided injections targeting sacroiliac joints were very accurate for periarticular injection, but accuracy was poor for intra- articular injection. Injectate was frequently found in contact with interosseous sacroiliac ligaments, as well as neurovascular and synovial structures in close vicinity of sacroiliac joints.