Summary
This review article discusses the following, as yet unanswered, questions and research
priorities to optimise patient management and stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
with the new direct oral anticoagulants (NOACs): 1. In patients prescribed a NOAC,
can the anticoagulant effects or plasma concentrations of the NOACs be measured rapidly
and reliably and, if so, can “cut-off points” between which anticoagulation is therapeutic
(i.e. the “therapeutic range”) be defined? 2. In patients who are taking a NOAC and
bleeding (e.g. intracerebral haemorrhage), can the anticoagulant effects of the direct
NOACs be reversed rapidly and, if so, can NOAC-associated bleeding and complications
be minimised and patient outcome improved? 3. In patients taking a NOAC who experience
an acute ischaemic stroke, to what degree of anticoagulation or plasma concentration
of NOAC, if any, can thrombolysis be administered safely and effectively? 4. In patients
with a recent cardioembolic ischaemic stroke, what is the optimal time to start (or
re-start) anticoagulation with a NOAC (or warfarin)? 5. In anticoagulated patients
who experience an intracranial haemorrhage, can anticoagulation with a NOAC be re-started
safely and effectively, and if so when? 6. Are the NOACs effective and safe in multimorbid
geriatric people (who commonly have atrial fibrillation and are at high risk of stroke
but also bleeding)? 7. Can dose-adjusted NOAC therapy augment the established safety
and efficacy of fixed-dose unmonitored NOAC therapy? 8. Is there a dose or dosing
regimen for each NOAC that is as effective and safe as adjusted-dose warfarin for
patients with atrial fibrillation who have mechanical prosthetic heart valves? 9.
What is the long-term safety of the NOACs?
Keywords
Clinical trials - direct antithrombin agents - coagulation inhibitors - stroke prevention