Development, standardization, and evaluation of NOTES cholecystectomy using a transsigmoid approach in the porcine model: an acute feasibility study

Background: Transluminal cholecystectomy is feasible. However, the procedure is time consuming, difficult, and poorly standardized so far. In the present study we therefore aimed to further evaluate and optimize a transsigmoid approach for cholecystectomy with minimal transabdominal assistance in the porcine model.

Methods: After a pilot series of 6 pigs, NOTES (natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery) cholecystectomy was performed in a standardized manner in another 12 pigs. A transsigmoid approach was applied via a specially designed trocar (ISSA) with a double-channel gastroscope advanced into the peritoneal cavity. After identification of the infundibulum, the cystic duct and artery were closed by application of hemostasis clips. After dissection of these structures, the gallbladder was separated from the liver by electrocautery following injection of isotonic saline solution. A grasper introduced through a modified Veress needle (initially used for establishing the hydroperitoneum) and an additional transcutaneous stay suture were used to ease preparation of the gallbladder.

Results: Transluminal cholecystectomy was successfully performed in all animals. No serious acute complications occurred; minor bleeding in 4 out of 12 cases (1 cystic artery and 3 liver parenchyma) was successfully handled by electrocautery. Clip application to close the cystic duct and artery resulted in complete sealing. Standardization of the procedure was associated with a significant decrease in total operating time (113.3 ± 31.8 minutes for the first 6 pigs and 73.6 ± 17.2 minutes for the last 6 pigs).

Conclusions: In pigs with a healthy gallbladder, our standardized technique of transsigmoid cholecystectomy could be performed relatively fast with acceptable complication rates at this level of evolution, as shown in these acute experiments.

References

• 1 Wagh M S, Thompson C C. Surgery insight: natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery - an analysis of work to date.  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;  4 386-392
• 2 Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Swain P, Park P O. Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 307-312
• 3 Feretis C, Kalantzopoulos D, Koulouris P. et al . Endoscopic transgastric procedures in anesthetized pigs: technical challenges, complications, and survival.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 394-400
• 4 Jagannath S B, Kantsevoy S V, Vaughn C A. et al . Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 449-453
• 5 Kantsevoy S V, Hu B, Jagannath S B. et al . Transgastric endoscopic splenectomy: is it possible?.  Surg Endosc. 2006;  20 522-525
• 6 Merrifield B F, Wagh M S, Thompson C C. Peroral transgastric organ resection: a feasibility study in pigs.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 693-697
• 7 Wagh M S, Merrifield B F, Thompson C C. Survival studies after endoscopic transgastric oophorectomy and tubectomy in a porcine model.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 473-478
• 8 Shih S P, Kantsevoy S V, Kalloo A N. et al . Hybrid minimally invasive surgery - a bridge between laparoscopic and translumenal surgery.  Surg Endosc. 2007;  21 1450-1453
• 9 Stark M, Benhidjeb T. Transcolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 208-209
• 10 Rolanda C, Lima E, Pego J M. et al . Third-generation cholecystectomy by natural orifices: transgastric and transvesical combined approach (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 111-117
• 11 Kantsevoy S V, Jagannath S B, Niiyama H. et al . Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 287-292
• 12 Pai R D, Fong D G, Bundga M E. et al . Transcolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 428-434
• 13 Cala Z, Niksic K, Nesek-Adam V, Klapan D, Soldo I. Cosmetic laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006;  16 577-581
• 14 Sumiyama K, Gostout C J, Rajan E. et al . Transgastric cholecystectomy: transgastric accessibility to the gallbladder improved with the SEMF method and a novel multibending therapeutic endoscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 1028-1034
• 15 Swanstrom L L, Kozarek R, Pasricha P J. et al . Development of a new access device for transgastric surgery.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;  9 1129-1136
• 16 Park P O, Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P. Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 601-606
• 17 Lima E, Rolanda C, Pego J M. et al . Transvesical endoscopic peritoneoscopy: a novel 5 mm port for intra-abdominal scarless surgery.  J Urol. 2006;  176 802-805
• 18 Wilhelm D, Meining A, von Delius S. et al . An innovative, safe and sterile sigmoid access (ISSA) for NOTES.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 401-406
• 19 Bhoyrul S, Vierra M A, Nezhat C R, Krummel T M, Way L W. Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery.  J Am Coll Surg. 2001;  192 677-683
• 20 Wagh M S, Merrifield B F, Thompson C C. Endoscopic transgastric abdominal exploration and organ resection: initial experience in a porcine model.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;  3 892-896
• 21 von Delius S, Huber W, Feussner H. et al . Effect of pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamics and inspiratory pressures during transgastric peritoneoscopy: an experimental, controlled study.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 854-861