Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-820943
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Evaluation of Arm-Leg Coordination in Flat Breaststroke
Publication History
Accepted after revision: October 4, 2003
Publication Date:
24 May 2004 (online)

Abstract
This study proposes a new method to evaluate arm-leg coordination in flat breaststroke. Five arm and leg stroke phases were defined with a velocity-video system. Five time gaps quantified the time between arm and leg actions during three paces of a race (200 m, 100 m and 50 m) in 16 top level swimmers. Based on these time gaps, effective glide, effective propulsion, effective leg insweep and effective recovery were used to identify the different stroke phases of the body.
A faster pace corresponded to increased stroke rate, decreased stroke length, increased propulsive phases, shorter glide phases, and a shorter T1 time gap, which measured the effective body glide. The top level swimmers showed short time gaps (T2, T3, T4, measuring the timing of arm-leg recoveries), which reflected the continuity in arm and leg actions. The measurement of these time gaps thus provides a pertinent evaluation of swimmers' skill in adapting their arm-leg coordination to biomechanical constraints.
Key words
Biomechanics - swimming - motor control - exercise - performance
References
- 1 Bober T, Czabanski B.
Changes in breaststroke techniques under different speed conditions. Clarys JP, Lewillie L Swimming Science II. Baltimore; University Park Press 1975: 188-193Reference Ris Wihthout Link - 2 Cappaert J M.
Rotational balance about the center of mass in the breaststroke. Troup JP, Hollander AP, Strass D, Trappe SW, Cappaert JM, Trappe TA Swimming Science VII. London; E & FN SPO 1996: 29-33Reference Ris Wihthout Link - 3 Chollet D, Boulesteix L.
Evolution of the butterfly coordination in relation to velocity and skill level of swimmers, . Blackwell JR, Sanders RH XIX International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. San Francisco; ISBS 2001: 22-26Reference Ris Wihthout Link - 4 Chollet D, Chalies S, Chatard J C. A new index of coordination for the crawl: description and usefulness. Int J Sports Med. 2000; 21 54-59
- 5 Chollet D, Pelayo P, Tourny C, Sidney M. Comparative analysis of 100 m and 200 m events in the four strokes in top level swimmers. J Hum Mov Studies. 1996; 31 25-37
- 6 Chollet D, Tourny-Chollet C, Gleizes F.
Evolution of coordination in flat breaststroke in relation to velocity. Keskinen KL, Komi PV, Hollander AP Swimming Science VIII. Jyvaskyla, Finnland; University of Jyvaskyla 1999: 29-32Reference Ris Wihthout Link - 7 Costill D L, Lee G, D'Acquisto L J. Video-computer assisted analysis of swimming technique. J Swim Research. 1987; 3 5-9
- 8 Costill D L, Maglischo E W, Richardson A B. Swimming. Oxford; Blackwell Scientific Publications 1992
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 9 Craig A B, Boomer W L, Skehan P L.
Patterns of velocity in competitive breaststroke swimming. Ungerechts BE, Wilke K, Reischle K Swimming Science V. Champaign, Illinois; Human Kinetics Publishers 1988: 73-77Reference Ris Wihthout Link - 10 Craig A B, Skehan P L, Pawelczyk J A, Boomer W L. Velocity, stroke rate, and distance per stroke during elite swimming competition. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1985; 17 625-634
- 11 D'Acquisto L J, Costill D L, Gehlsen G M, Young W T, Lee G. Breaststroke economy, skill, and performance: study of breaststroke mechanics using a computer based “velocity-video” system. J Swim Research. 1988; 4 9-13
- 12 Fujishima M, Miyashita M.
Velocity degradation caused by its fluctuation in swimming and guidelines for improvement of average velocity. Keskinen KL, Komi PV, Hollander AP Swimming Science VIII. Jyvaskyla, Finland; University of Jyvaskula 1999: 41-45Reference Ris Wihthout Link - 13 Holmer I.
Analysis of acceleration as a measure of swimming proficiency. Terauds J, Bedingfield EW Swimming Science III. Baltimore; University Park Press 1979: 118-124Reference Ris Wihthout Link - 14 Kolmogorov S V, Rumyantseva O A, Gordon B J, Cappaert J M. Hydrodynamic characteristics of competitive swimmers of different genders and performance levels. J Appl Biomech. 1997; 13 88-97
- 15 Maglischo E W. Swimming Even Faster. Mountain View; Mayfield Publishing 1993
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 16 Manley P K, Atha J.
Intra-stroke velocity fluctuations in paced breaststroke swimming. MacLaren D, Reilly T, Less A Swimming Science VI. London, England; E & FN SPO 1992: 151-159Reference Ris Wihthout Link - 17 Nemessuri M, Vaday M.
Breaststroke motor pattern. Lewillie L, Clarys JP Swimming Science I. Brussels, Belgique; Université libre de Bruxelles 1971: 161-166Reference Ris Wihthout Link - 18 Pai Y C, Hay J G, Wilson B D. Stroking techniques of elite swimmers. J Sports Sci. 1984; 2 225-239
- 19 Persyn U JJ, Colman V, Van Tilborgh L.
Movement analysis of the flat and undulating breaststroke pattern. MacLaren D, Reilly T, Less A Swimming Science VI. London, England; E & FN SPO 1992: 75-80Reference Ris Wihthout Link - 20 Persyn U JJ, Hoeven R GC, Daly D J.
An evaluation procedure for competitive swimmers. Terauds J, Bedingfield EW Swimming Science III. Baltimore; University Park Press 1979: 182-195Reference Ris Wihthout Link - 21 Persyn U JJ, Van Tilborgh L, Daly D J, Colman V, Vijfvinkel D J, Verhetsel D.
Computerized evaluation and advice in swimming. Ungerechts BE, Wilke K, Reischle K Swimming Science V. Champaign, Illinois; Human Kinetics Publishers 1988: 341-349Reference Ris Wihthout Link - 22 Sanders R H. Can skilled performers readily change technique? An example, conventional to wave action breaststroke. Hum Mov Sci. 1995; 14 665-679
- 23 Sanders R H.
Breaststroke technique variations among New Zealand Pan Pacific squad swimmers. Troup JP, Hollander AP, Strass D, Trappe SW, Cappaert JM, Trappe TA Swimming Science VII. London, England; E & FN SPO 1996: 64-69Reference Ris Wihthout Link - 24 Soares P M, Sousa F, Vilas-Boas J P.
Differences in breaststroke synchronisation induced by different race velocities. Keskinen KL, Komi PV, Hollander AP Swimming Science VIII. Jyvaskyla, Finland; University of Jyvaskula 1999: 53-57Reference Ris Wihthout Link - 25 Tourny C, Chollet D, Micallef J P, Macabies J.
Comparative analysis of studies of speed variations within a breaststroke cycle. MacLaren D, Reilly T, Less A Swimming Science VI. London, England; E & FN SPO 1992: 161-166Reference Ris Wihthout Link - 26 Ungerechts B E.
The relation of peak body acceleration to phases of movements in swimming. Ungerechts BE, Wilke K, Reischle K Swimming Science V. Champaign, Illinois; Human Kinetics Publishers 1988: 61-66Reference Ris Wihthout Link - 27 Van Tilborgh L M, Stijnen V V, Persyn U J.
Using velocity fluctuations for estimating resistance and propulsion forces in breaststroke swimming. Johnsson B Biomechanics X-B. Champaign, Illinois; Human Kinetics Publishers 1987: 779-784Reference Ris Wihthout Link - 28 Vilas-Boas J P.
Speed fluctuations and energy cost of different breaststroke techniques. Troup JP, Hollander AP, Strass D, Trappe SW, Cappaert JM, Trappe TA Swimming Science VII. London, England; E & FN SPO 1996: 167-171Reference Ris Wihthout Link - 29 Vilas-Boas J P, Santos P.
Comparison of swimming economy in three breaststroke techniques. Miyashita M, Mutoh Y, Richardson AB Medicine and Science in Aquatic Sports. Vol. 39. Basel; Karger 1994: 48-54Reference Ris Wihthout Link - 30 Wilkie D, Juba K. The Handbook of Swimming. London, England; Pelham Books 1986
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
M. Didier Chollet
L Seifert
University of Rouen, Faculty of Sports Sciences, CETAPS Laboratory
Bld Siegfried
76821 Mont Saint Aignan Cedex
France
Phone: + 33232107793
Fax: + 33 2 32 10 77 93
Email: didier.chollet@univ-rouen.fr
Email: l.seifert@libertysurf.fr