Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1789005
Long-Term Outcome of Surgery for Grade 4 Gynecomastia: A Single-Center Experience
Authors
Funding None.

Abstract
Background Gynecomastia results in a feminine appearance of the male chest, leading to social embarrassment and loss of self-esteem in the afflicted males. Grade 4 gynecomastia is expected to have less than perfect results with liposuction and gland excision alone. This study was done to assess the long-term outcome of this surgery for grade 4 gynecomastia.
Materials and Methods From January 2021 to December 2022, 81 patients with grade 4 gynecomastia were treated by us. All the patients underwent vibration amplification of sound energy at resonance (VASER) and suction-assisted liposuction of the chest and side rolls with excision of the gland with crescentic lift in the cases with ptosis. A retrospective study was done to analyze the long-term surgical outcomes in these patients by review of clinical records.
Results Symmetry was achieved in 37/39 patients with grade 4a gynecomastia but only in 33/42 patients with grade 4b gynecomastia. The inframammary fold disappeared in 35/39 patients with grade 4a gynecomastia but only in 25/42 of grade 4b gynecomastia patients. Ptosis was corrected in 35/42 grade 4b gynecomastia patients. The mean follow-up was 15 months (range: 12–24 months). Only seven patients desired a second stage to correct the remaining deformity.
Conclusion Liposuction with gland removal alone in grade 4a gynecomastia and with liposuction with crescentic nipple–areola complex (NAC) lift in patients of grade 4b gynecomastia give satisfactory results in patients with massively enlarged breasts. While grade 4a gynecomastia has overall better results and lesser complications as compared with grade 4b gynecomastia, the latter also has acceptable outcomes. Realistic prognosis needs to be explained to the patient preoperatively.
Note
This paper was presented by Dr. Aakanksha Goel at APSICON 2023, Indore on December 30, 2023.
Publication History
Article published online:
03 September 2024
© 2024. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Kim DH, Byun IH, Lee WJ, Rah DK, Kim JY, Lee DW. Surgical management of gynecomastia: subcutaneous mastectomy and liposuction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2016; 40 (06) 877-884
- 2 Song YN, Wang YB, Huang R. et al. Surgical treatment of gynecomastia: mastectomy compared to liposuction technique. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 73 (03) 275-278
- 3 Ibrahiem SMS. Severe gynecomastia: new technique using superior pedicle NAC flap through a circumareolar approach. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76: 645-651
- 4 Mett TR, Pfeiler PP, Luketina R, Bingöl AS, Krezdorn N, Vogt PM. Surgical treatment of gynaecomastia: a standard of care in plastic surgery. Eur J Plast Surg 2020; 43: 389-398
- 5 Arvind A, Khan MA, Srinivasan K, Roberts J. Gynaecomastia correction: a review of our experience. Indian J Plast Surg 2014; 47 (01) 56-60
- 6 Holzmer SW, Lewis PG, Landau MJ, Hill ME. Surgical management of gynecomastia: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (10) e3161
- 7 Brown RH, Chang DK, Siy R, Friedman J. Trends in the surgical correction of gynecomastia. Semin Plast Surg 2015; 29 (02) 122-130
- 8 Punia S, Gupta A. A new clinical classification for gynecomastia management and predictive outcome. Indian J Plast Surg 2023; 56 (04) 332-337
- 9 Hurwitz DJ, Davila AA. Contemporary management of gynecomastia. Clin Plast Surg 2022; 49 (02) 293-305
- 10 Zavlin D, Jubbal KT, Friedman JD, Echo A. Complications and outcomes after gynecomastia surgery: analysis of 204 pediatric and 1583 adult cases from a national multi-center database. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2017; 41 (04) 761-767
- 11 Innocenti A, Melita D, Mori F, Ciancio F, Innocenti M. Management of gynecomastia in patients with different body types: considerations on 312 consecutive treated cases. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 78 (05) 492-496
- 12 Dixit VV, Wagh MS. Unfavourable outcomes of liposuction and their management. Indian J Plast Surg 2013; 46 (02) 377-392
- 13 Dhami LD. Liposuction. Indian J Plast Surg 2008; 41 (suppl): S27-S40
- 14 Bailey SH, Guenther D, Constantine F, Rohrich RJ. Gynecomastia management: An evolution and refinement in technique at UT southwestern medical center. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (06) e734
- 15 Abdelwahab A, Eleowa S, Khalifa M. Assessment of skin redraping after liposuction in treatment of gynecomastia grade III Simon's classification. Al Azhar Int Med J 2021; 2 (07) 79-86
- 16 Ramasamy K, Shet SM, Patil P, Tripathee S, Dhevi N, Alagarasan AR. Anthropometric measurements and analysis for objective assessment of gynecomastia surgery results. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum 2023; 5: ojad073
- 17 Innocenti A, Melita D, Dreassi E. Incidence of complications for different approaches in gynecomastia correction: a systematic review of the literature. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2022; 46 (03) 1025-1041
- 18 Chao JW, Raveendran JA, Maly C, Rogers G, Boyajian M, Oh AK. Closed-suction drains after subcutaneous mastectomy for gynecomastia: do they reduce complications?. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2017; 41 (06) 1291-1294
- 19 Boccara D, Serror K, Malca N, Chaouat M, Mimoun M. Closed-suction drains after subcutaneous mastectomy for gynecomastia: do they reduce complications? a different approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018; 42 (03) 908-910
- 20 Keskin M, Sutcu M, Cigsar B, Karacaoglan N. Necessity of suction drains in gynecomastia surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2014; 34 (04) 538-544
- 21 Chao JW, Raveendran JA, Maly C, Rogers G, Boyajian M, Oh AK. Closed-suction drains after subcutaneous mastectomy for gynecomastia: do they reduce complications?. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2017; 41 (06) 1291-1294
- 22 Pinelli M, De Maria F, Ceccarelli P. et al. Surgical management of adolescents with severe gynecomastia: personal experience and outcome analysis. Acta Biomed 2023; 94 (02) e2023055
- 23 Ramasamy K, Jagadish Kiran ACV, Jesudass J, Raj S. NAC plaster lifting technique for the management of skin redundancy in severe gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10 (05) e4339
- 24 Ramasamy K, Tripathee S, Murugesh A, Jesudass J, Sinha R, Alagarasan AR. A Single-center experience with gynecomastia treatment using liposuction, complete gland removal, and nipple areola complex lifting plaster technique: a review of 448 patients. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum 2023; 5: ojac095